I define efficiency in this context as getting the most humor with the least effort.
To put this in perspective, a prop-comic or magician would be very inefficient because they use lots of stuff. A stand-up comedian such as Stephen Wright, who uses very little verbiage, would be extremely efficient. Someone like George Carlin or Bill Cosby would be in the middle of the scale because they often tell long-ish stories and jokes.
This isn’t who is funniest in absolute terms, or who you would most like to watch. Rather, it’s who gets the most bang for the comic buck.
My nomination is Roy Blount Jr. When he’s on the “Wait Wait, Don’t Tell Me…” panel, he’s like a comic ninja. He often requires only a sparse sentence, or a single word to break up both the audience and his fellow panelists, yet his humor is smart and incisive.
What made me think of him was a remark on Wait Wait, Don’t Tell Me… The news story was that GW Bush had been asked about the best moment of his presidency. He supposedly said it was catching a big fish in his lake in Crawford.
The rest of the panel made mostly predictable jokes. When it settled down Blount simply said, “I’d like to defend the president on this. I think he was right.”
It was like comedy aikido. He seems to be able to do that sort of thing consistently, which is what got me pondering the idea of “efficiency” in comedy and humor.
You must admit that, as he delivered it, it was a brilliant joke, yet one not easily “gotten” out of context ((weary voice) if you have to explain it, it’s not funny.)
I immediately thought of Mitch Hedburg, although I couldn’t remember his name until someone else mentioned him. He could very easily produce an amount of laughter far longer than the time it took for him to deliver the lines. And he didn’t move on stage, he kept his head down and spoke into the microphone. Absolutely minimal stage presence, minimal joke length, but among the funniest comedians I’ve seen.