Openness: Yoda (95%)
Conscientious: Han Solo (13%)
Extraversion: Wampas (18%)
Agreeableness: Boba Fett (38%)
Neuroticism: Tuscan warriors (96%)
So what does this mean? I’m wise, philosophical, thoughtful, discheveled, scruffy, reckless, haphazard, little respect for rules & procedures, reclusive, shy, solitary, mean, menacing & ruthless, unpredictable, temperamental, excitable, and especially moody?
We-ell, I suppose it’s reasonably accurate. Although I doubt anyone I know would rate me as mean, menacing or ruthless.
Out of curiosity, I rated my sister as well–she came out as follows:
Openness: Yoda (95%)
Conscientious: Mon Mothma (74%)
Extraversion: Ewoks (59%)
Agreeableness: Qui-Gon Jinn (69%)
Neurotocism: Chewbacca (60%)
Which makes her wise, philosophical, thoughtful, with great integrity, responsible, organized, shy timid & reclusive on one hand yet sociable on the other hand, loyal, sensitive, sympathetic, strong & fearless yet excitable and easily upset.
I think that describes her pretty accurately.
Now comes the interesting part of this. She’s taking the test right this moment, and I’m curious to see how her results compare with mine.
Okay–here’s the results.
She rated me:
Openness: Yoda (93%)
Conscientious: Admiral Ozzel (35%) --she says I’m very easily distracted, which I am 
Extraversion: Old Ben Kenobi (37%)
Agreeableness: Qui-Gon Jinn (74%)
Neurotocism: Tuscan warrior (88%)
She rated herself:
Openness: Wicket (76%)
Conscientious: Mon Mothma (47%)
Extraversion: Ewok (42%)
Agreeableness: Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker (58%)
Neuroticism: Tuscan Warrior (87%)
So we each rated ourselves lower than the other rated us, but I rated her more highly than she rated me. I tend to feel that my assessment of her is a little more accurate than hers was, so perhaps her assessment of me is a little more accurate than my own.
Who knows–it was an entertaining diversion, anyway!