Not sure of my exact post count until I post this, but let’s say about 409. 409/308 is a ratio of 1.32.
Is it better to have a lower or higher? That’s a matter of opinion, I guess. On the one hand I could congratulate myself for being succint or thorough, but it could also mean that I tend to give up after one post. Or do seagull posting, where I swoop down onto a thread, crap on it, and fly off.
Generally, though, in my case I try not to indulge in “conversation” which earlier in my newbiedom I saw someone get their ass chewed for. I also tend to discover that someone will speak my mind for me better than I could, so there is no need to post again.
I also don’t tend to post to the “point, counterpoint” threads and don’t spend much time at great debates, etc. I’d expect a much higher ratio from people who tackle those questions.
A system that records the number of time you roll your eyes? I’d probably be ashamed at my count.
I wonder whether the ‘standard range’ hold for people who primarily post in only one forum? Methinks the Pit and GD specialists would have a higher ratio.
Mine is 1.35. I interpret this to mean that I can succinctly express myself with one post in most cases, while occasionaly offering more of my wisdom when it is needed.
I’m sure it has nothing to do with all those “what color is your toothbrush” type threads that only require one post…
Mr. Cynical, on the other hand…I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. You just must have a huge wellspring of wisdom to share. OK, maybe wisdom isn’t the right word…