How glasses affect your image.
I’m not really sure if this should go in IMHO, GQ or MPSIMS, but I’ll try chucking it in here for now.
Anyway, I had my eyes checked a while back. It turns out that I’m longsighted. Not being able to see diddly at close range for a while should have been a hint, I guess. To rectify this, I recently got my first pair of spectacles. Far from impeding me in my daily life, this has led to several advantages. Firstly, I can once again see pretty great, which is brilliant. Because of that, I now feel pretty great. Also, I can now finally feel like a real librarian. Also, somewhat unexpectedly, (and if I may say so myself) I *look pretty great, at least a lot better than before.
More to the point, I’ve also become aware that I frequently find bespectacled members of the opposite sex frankly smoking hot. There’s nothing like a tad of myopia or a hint of hyperopia to get me going. Astigmatism? Bring it on! This is nothing new to me, but I hadn’t really though about it before. A quick look around in contemporary culture reveals that I’m far from the only one who feels this way.
However, darwinistically speaking, how does this make sense? Surely, poor eyesight is a disability and a potential sight of bad genes? When faced with a lovely young lady sporting that irresistible librarian look, shouldn’t my monkey brain be thinking, “She don’t see no good. Probably shouldn’t reproduce with her. Will make lousy blind offspring.” Instead, what’s going on is more akin to: “Yes! Girls in glasses have magnificent asses! Let’s get it on and have a bunch of kiddies who can’t navigate inside buildings without the aid of modern optometric technology! Great idea!”
I mean, come on? As disabilities go, this is surely pretty unique. If someone is missing an arm or a leg, that doesn’t usually add to that person’s sex appeal (unless that’s your kink - if so, you’ll forgive me).
Is it a purely cultural thing? Is the cultural association of being blind as a bat with intellectual activity and intelligence so powerful that it overrides the monkey programming? Or there something else going on? Is it simply the fact that, well, glasses make people’s faces look good, and we’re not genetically designed to know what the heck glasses are anyway, and so it doesn’t figure in the hump-or-flee analysis?
Finally - are there any counter-examples? Are glasses actually a turn-*off *for some of you guys and girls?
*Yes, ladies, it’s official: I’m balding and I wear glasses. However, I try to look more like this guy than this guy , so yes, I think I’m somehow managing to make it work for me.