Why? Why did they make a sequel to President Bush when the first one really wasn’t any good?
For those of us that wern’t paying attention when the first one came out, naturally
Sort of like digitally remastering something (then adding drunk driving arrests, coke and a total lack of interest in world affairs)
Personally, i’m scared
Upham
Maybe this is like a prequel.
President Bush: Younger And Dumber.
Actually, what’s really scary is that the sequel is really more like the first one’s VP, Quayle.
And, it appears that he’s an automaton, too.
In 1555, Nostradamus wrote:
“Come the millenium, month 12,
In the home of greatest power,
The village idiot will come forth
To be acclaimed the leader.”
How’s that?
What really freaks me out is this
[conspiracy theory]
What i figure is, the American Government has realized that no one really cares about the vote (when you think about it, Bush was only elected by 25% of the population)
So, what they’ve done is they’ve decided to create a sort of Soap Operaesque aura around the whole President thing. Bush is elected, is beaten out (bitterly) by Clinton. Clinton does his best to draw attention to him self and is then beaten out by <duhn duhn DAH!> Bush’s son! And this time, it’s personal!
The next step? Hillary beats out George W (while carrying Jake’s baby, though Bill’s never gonna know it because Jake drove off a cliff when his brakes mysteriously failed although, as it turns out, he DID’NT really die and will actually be elected President in 2008)
Like sands through the hour glass, my friends, like sands through the hourglass
[/conspiracy theory]
Anyway, it’s all in fun (here in Canada we elected our Prime Minister in one day. Granted he’s a conceited, pompous ass hole, but at least we didn’t take a bloody month about it)
Upham
That’s as good a question as “Why seven Police Academy movies?” Zero would have been enough. And that goes for Bushes as well, although I would fully support the shrubs, should they decide to run at some future time.
Deude, The Phantom Menace brought disgrace to the prequel name.
coughSNOPEScough
I keep telling myself it’s just a psych student’s experiment to prove the bell curve for intelligence.
Well, it was either a Bush sequel, or four years of C-3PO.
“Artoo-Detoo, where are you?”
“I’m right here… and for the last time, my name is Janet!”
Personally, I’ll take the sequel.
Well, I’d rather have See Threepio than JarJar Binks.
(even though I actually LIKE JarJar!)
:o
All I can say is thank god we didn’t get Clinton’s sequel.
Does anybody else sense a pattern here?
Star Wars (Reagan/Bush)
The Democrats Strike Back (Clinton)
Return of the Shrub (Dubya)
But now I’m trying to figure out how the Death Star fits into all of this… Military spending, perhaps? Does Jabba equal Bill and is Leia Hillary? Is Jar-Jar equivalent to Dan Quayle, R2D2 analogous to Al Gore? I’m confused.
Will someone with too much time on their hands step in and save our saga before it’s too late? (Help me, Ralph Nader, you’re my only hope!)
Damn, Smeghead, you beat me to it.