Nooo…that’s self-mocking humor delivered with tongue firmly in cheek. As is the notion of casually tossing in one of my favorite characters in league with fictional characters of great reknown. I do that sometimes.
It’s middling. The point is, though, that trying to evaluate Gandalf’s “level” with D&D stats is pointless. Gandalf is not a D&D mage. Neither is he an Everquest mage, nor a WoW mage, nor any other kind of game mage. There were exactly five wizards in Middle-Earth. They were not human. There is no comparison.
Yabut there was also the Witch-King. And the Black Numenorean necromancers. And the Blue Wizards might have been responsible for founding schools of magic in the eastern lands! And what of Queen Beruthiel and her cats? And Radagast had a squirrel apprentice that he taught spells to, although that was a story that I wrote so maybe it doesn’t count.
FWIW, D&D 3.5’s Epic Level Handbook specifically mentions Gandalf as an ‘epic’ character, ie lvl20+. That means he has access to custom super-powered spells that can be cast with no one the wiser.
I have to agree with earlier posters, though, that Gandalf is so good, he doesn’t even need to sling Fireballs around to get the job done. If I had to stretch the D&D analogy, Gandalf has crazy good skill modifiers and saves. (Except the Balrog’s natural 20 one on the bridge. I refuse to believe that Gandalf could fail a save.)
For those who don’t know, Balrogs are Maiar also, like Gandalf and Sauron, corrupted by Morgoth. They had great power, and Aragorn or Legolas would’ve been toys.
Only 5 Wizards if we narrow it to the Istari, but plenty of other magic users of various sorts. Even Thranduil had some magic though his son did not seem to.
As to Radagast, if we are being silly about this, then he trained Glee’s character Ghân on this very board.
I see you are also an aficionado of Moon-Tse’s “The Art of Wizardry.”
===================
Dr. Strange, Master of the Mystic Arts, would have simply summoned up the Dread Dormammu and banished all RPG wizards to the Cavern of Torments.
Which is to say, there aren’t any criteria for comparing the relative prowess of fictional magic users from universes with disparate “laws of magic.” Maybe there can’t be.
In the real, non-magical world Gandalf stands out as the premier magic-user in the single work of fiction that all but singlehandedly resurrected epic fantasy from a specialty genre read by only a few dozen enthusiasts, to a culturally significant movement in popular literature – and an impact on the cultural awareness and motivation of its millions of readers. It would not be going overboard to say that Gandalf was an element in the ending of the Vietnam War – the shift from the 1950s-early 60s ‘fight communism’/progress ethos to the late 60s-70s antiwar/environmentalism ethos can be attributed in part to the popularity of Tolkien. Tolkien’s legacy is still a little close to accurately measure, but (as was discussed in another thread recently) I believe it’s safe to say that his writing stands head and shoulders above anything in the fantasy genre since in its influence on popular culture.
Some years back I cleaned out my parents’ attic, and found my old Hula Hoop and my copy of “The Little Old Lady from Pasadena” album. I suspect that in 40 years or so, people will feel much the same about a Gygax DM handbook and WoW printouts from Blizzard as I did then.
I’m pretty sure Gothmog fought one of the Noldor and they killed each other. I want to say it was Ecthelion, but I’ll have to check The Silmarillion. I don’t think the Moria Balrog was anyone special.