[QUOTE=]
Democrats refuse to admit that people who disagree with them even exist.
[/QUOTE]
I think you exist and you don’t know what is going on. not sure if this is better than being a troll…maybe slightly.
So name names. Who on this board would cheer if Hillary Clinton committed public infanticide? And if that was merely metaphorical and hyperbolic (along with the “shit ice cream” remark) and it actually applies to no specific person and it’s obviously gaining you no traction, then why not fall back on more plausible, more relevant and more realistic criticisms?
My own interest is academic, I admit; I’m not going to be voting for Hillary Clinton or any Democrat.
It’s called “giving them the benefit of the doubt.”
-
Do you think I actually expect to “gain traction” with a group I’m calling out as hypocritical?
I would just like to state, for the record, haHA to those people in 2008 who were so pissed off because I didn’t like Hillary. The truth is OUT! Waymore says I’m one of her biggest fans, and he can’t be wrong!
When did I say that?
Wait, so what is it that I feel for Clinton? I need to know!
So you express your disinterest in credibility by throwing away any chance at credibility? Hey, good for you, buddy, going to all that effort to get a response while claiming you don’t care about a response.
Come on JS, you’re better than this. If you’re going to attribute saying to me, it’s a simple matter quote me.
Credibility? I never said anything about credibility. You asked me a question, I answered. Pretty nifty how that works.
You’re saying we’re such huge fans we won’t cavil over the hyperbolic baby eating. I would have thought that meant we, as a group, are pretty in love with her. It doesn’t mean that?
Seems like a fair interpretation, but you said:
So, I said:
Still waiting for that quote.
Actually, I asked you to name names, and you did not. If your comment was solely hyperbole, then your effort is wasted, at least in any sense of establishing that you know or understand anything about American politics.
So now I picture you typing furiously while wearing only poorly-applied clown makeup, not all of it on your face.
You keep making the same error, namely that I have any sort of goal besides expressing my opinion. I know when folks are beyond help.
So, if I’m a clown (very creative by the way, do you have an MFA?) why bother responding to my blathering? Want I should make you a balloon animal instead? I could take you for a ride in my car, but it’s kind of cramped.
Why would I need to provide a quote? This is the thread where we make hyperbolic statements, isn’t it?
Surely you have some reason for wanting to grace the poor fools at the SDMB with your opinion.
Over and over with little variation, it seems. Rather futile process for such an effort, but heck, I once did a scene-by-scene analysis of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan to bolster an argument that the “KHAAANN!” yell was a display of genuine fury and frustration. You want to know who’s beyond help, it’s the people who say Kirk was faking.
You know even less about clown cars than you do about politics. Clown cars are roomy and magical, which is why you were so readily conceived in the back of one.
Mocking you personally amuses me. Trying to mock an ill-defined group of people while being too cowardly to name any particular one of them, I leave to you.
Oh, you noticed that, too?
Be frightened, Waymore. You’ve bitten off more than you can chew. Bryan rarely appears more than a couple times in a thread, but now you have his attention. Fortunate for you that you can’t recognized when you’ve been pwned.
Nope, just chewing the fat.
Bravo Bryan Ekers. You’re a true hero.