I honestly haven’t laughed this hard in a while, think of me what you will. There are no pictures when you click through to this link to the talk page for the wikipedia article on the [[Human anus]]. Instead you will find a straightforward and yet somehow unbelievable and unbelievably funny conversation on the appropriateness of various images of anuses in the main article.
I’m reading this at work, you might not be allowed to :eek::D:rolleyes:
See, the tragedy of Samuel Johnson is that we don’t have correspondence like this to look through. If he discussed this sort of thing with anyone, history has no record, to our loss.
What Wikipedia really needs is a picture of a person figuring out what their anus looks like. That would really take the cake, and be very informative as well, since I haven’t figured that out yet despite strenuous effort.
Just one tidbid from the talk page:
“The shaved and more desirable anus should be the first one to be seen in the article. With the current setup, the only possible way to admire the smooth, clean anus is to have it in the same frame as the hairy anus. Please fix this”
And here I thought I needed a life. You know when I’m saying to anyone “get a life”, it’s got to be pretty bad.
It’s like, you just want to interject “Uh, guys? YOU’RE ARGUING OVER ANUS PICTURES”.
Well first I went to Wikipedia because one of my friends asked me what a sphincter says and I was trying to find out. Then I saw a link to the anus article and clicked!