Will Trump survive his treatment of Khizr and Ghazala Khan?

We’ll have a pretty good idea come November.

Personally, I think the number is closer to 40%.

By popular vote or Electoral College?

Of course, Trump will “survive” his attacks on the parents of an actual hero. His followers are mad as hell and they are not going to even pay attention to that sort of thing.

I am, too. After all, Trump managed to get through the Vietnam years without getting killed, didn’t he?

That would make him a “war hero,” wouldn’t it? His people should be playing up this angle.

On the other hand, the actual content of those ads is not yet set in concrete. Whoever has already purchased the air time could simply substitute the unending bloopers for whatever slick message they had originally intended.

Of course, in the real world, it does not matter: Trump supporters have long since determined that he is The One and not even finding a dead girl or a live boy in his bed is going to change their opinions. There might be some Clinton hating independents who could be persuaded by such ads, but I suspect that we could move the vote up to tomorrow and get the same results we will get in November.

Trump is a cockroach. He’ll survive a nuclear holocaust.

Both. I think 65%-35% loss isn’t out of the question by popular vote, though that’s pushing it.

The standard crazification factor is 27%.

Ooops. Wrong thread.

All these posts that pop up each time Trump says something outrageous suggesting that “now he’s done it! This is the big one!” made me think of Fred Sanford. (Replace “I’m coming to join you” with “He’s coming to join you” and “I’m dying” with “he’s dying.” You know what I mean.)

Cockroaches object to being associated with Trump.

That depends on how the contract is written, pretty sure there’s often some flexibility. I also imagine that if someone is paying enough, a station can cut back on “Next time on <blank>!” and public service spots.

There are 60 minutes in an hour. TV stations will be willing to make the big sacrifice to sell more time by substantially cutting back low priority items like programs.

The Washington Post gave some more background…

Alas, I don’t know that this latest atrocity will convince any hard core Trump supporters. But it’s one more event that might wake up those still undecided…

The highly accurate (which I’m basing on the last two presidential elections) FiveThirtyEight site ran by Nate Silver shows a significant jump for Clinton in all three of the poll methodologies used there, including a whopping jump of 15% since Saturday of Clinton winning the election if it were held today. Was this just a convention bounce, or did Trump’s comments on Khan have more to do with it? I cannot say, but they certainly haven’t helped him.

I wonder if your post would have been different if you actually read the link? :rolleyes:

Yet, eventually it did happen (and on the set of a TV show he was filming, too. Nobody at first checked on him because they simply assumed that it was just another one of his pratfalls in that vein).

It appears this episode has frightened Trump’s own campaign staff, and they are looking to Republicans in the Senate and house for some kind of unspecified “support.” Here is a Reuter’s story about it.

The campaign is soliciting supportive statements from elected party members about his statements regarding the Khans, and they are trying to spin his words into something not so egregiously offensive. The reinterpreting his words is not new, but as far as I know soliciting support from within the party apparatus is.

It’s a smart move. If there’s one thing Congressional Republicans love, it’s an opportunity to go back to their districts in an election year and say that they stood up to the families of service members who were killed in action.

Unfortunately, it won’t matter nearly as much as it should because the offender is a white conservative male and the people being disparaged are Muslims, whose contributions are less valued. Trump will survive this, and assuming he does, it will in my mind represent one hell of a dangerous tipping point in American political and social discourse. We are nearing the point of no return.