We had a big conference call at work today, to give us a 30,000 foot overview of Agile. I can excuse the technical difficulties that delayed getting things going at the start. These things happen, after all.
What I cannot excuse is the damned fool idiot who was too oblivious to notice that he hadn’t muted his microphone/phone line, and who had a constant stream of chatter and, at the end of the call, about 10 minutes of HOLD MUSIC, interrupting and obscuring the presenter.
Dude, we do not want to hear your phone conversations. We do not want to hear your phone ring. We REALLY do not want to hear the lite jazz hold music. WAKE UP!! People are commenting on this. The presenter and the call organizer both made audible requests for everyone to go on mute. The host sent a conference IM about it. How did you not hear your own voice and your own phone and your own hold music? How, if you heard it, could you not have the basic courtesy to do something about it?
Oh, and organizer? I believe Webex has controls that allow you to mute everyone calling in, even if they didn’t get a clue and do it to themselves. Waiting until the last five minutes to even look for those controls shows a basic lack of ability to grasp a concept on YOUR part, too.
And after all that, the presentation really didn’t give me a whole lot of information I hadn’t already gotten on my own. OK, it was only 2 hours, there’s only so much you can cover. But I was hoping for a bit more information on things like user stories and how to use them, since that’s what I’m most directly concerned with right now.
<sigh>
Revisiting SG and the forks, it occurs to me that while stealing them might be enough to get him fired, the problem will be proving it.
All we’ve got right now is a reasonable suspicion that those forks are ones that **flatlined **marked, as it’s entirely possible that someone else marked their forks for some other purpose, and said someone else used the same location and color of nail polish **flatlined **did. Hooker red is a screamingly obvious color, and it sounds like she put the dots in a pretty logical location.
What she needs to do is mark them with a couple of different colours in a predetermined sequence, and then she has to take pictures. This way, we’ve got proof that they’re uniquely marked.
If the uniquely marked ones show up in a thrift store, though, we still only have half the battle won. We now have proof that they were stolen. What we *don’t *have proof of is who did the stealing. Sure, we all know it’s SG, but knowing and proving aren’t the same things. There are others in the warehouse with the opportunity to take them, and all he has to do is go into his po’ me, why are you persecutin’ an old, po’ man, never did a bad turn to a fly, my mamma didn’t raise a thief, it must be someone else routine to throw suspicion on everyone in the warehouse.
I suspect, given that the thefts are petty, that nothing will be done about this, either. It’d cost to much to investigate, probably.