It’s okay, I’m over 33, so apparently he won’t be turning up on my doorstep with a ring & a legally binding contract anytime soon!
Yes, that’s certainly a valid point. The weird one is Nicole Kidman. If I recall, wasn’t she genuinely surprised by the breakup?
Of course my serious answer is no, I wouldn’t but if I were attracted to men I’d probably think about it. Mainly I just wanted to point out that he’s not all bad.
Too married and too gay. But god help me I still love watching him act.
He’s the only man on earth who can’t enjoy Tom Cruise.
(Now I’ll be humming that all day - thanks, 42fish!)
Sex or no sex, there’s something kinda whore-y about marrying someone for money. So, no. And he and Katie were married for, what, 5 years? That’s a long time to be in a sham relationship, and no getting some on the side due to the intense media spotlight. Katie Holmes always looked a little sad, too. It doesn’t seem like it was very good for her.
Of course there is. And high-class whores will always live better than you or I. That’s the whole point of marrying for money: get as much as you can for as long as you can!
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Nooooooooooooooooo.
THIS!
Man, I saw there were 3 options and assumed the third one would be “HELL NO.” Because that’s my vote.
What I want most in a spouse is someone who puts my needs first. I’m a little lonely and bitter right now–the post-Holiday blahs, but still . . .
I’m pretty sure Tom Cruise puts Tom Cruise first, either Suri or Scientology second, the other third, his career fourth and any potential new bride somewhere about fifth. Maybe, if she’s lucky.
I can see why some people would like his money, but, frankly, at this time, what I want most is to be really and truly important to someone, and I don’t think that’s likely with a celebrity.
I think that’s the thing.
He’s a goodlooking, known-for-his-kindness, extremely wealthy, talented guy (if a bit too fanatical about certain things), but the problem is his partner will be far from his priority. Sure his public displays of affection are well known (bounce**bouncebounce*) but they don’t seem genuine, especially as he divorces like clockwork. Maybe if he comes out of closet he might be more sincere.
Not for a free personality test and a big clock.
a big clock?
Never heard the expression “I wouldn’t do it for a big clock” ? Could be a British thing I suppose.
I am British but I’ve never heard it before
Eek, no -
[ol]
[li]He’s a bit older than my parents so I doubt we would have much in common[/li][li]If he follows the divorce-at-33 rule I’ll be stuck with him for about a decade[/li][li]I’m not willing to convert to Scientology at all[/li][li]I like my privacy and I hate being photographed[/li][li]This sounds terrible but his teeth bother me. They are perfect, except that they are way out of alignment with the midline of his face. Somehow that’s worse than if they were all mangled and chipped. [/li][/ol]
Typo for cock? If so, be aware that the rumor mill says that Tom’s is infantile.
I am so stealing this answer!
If he really loves me, maybe I could get him to convert away from Scientology. That would damage the church’s mainstream credibility, making it a noble act. But I don’t think I could stomach marrying him.
Not interested in him one bit, although he was very good in Interview With the Vampire**. He’s too wacky and he’s probably very boring and shallow too. I could be wrong, but I’d imagine that’s what happens to you after years of being in the public eye and having to maintain an image.