For all his claims about Italian tradition, the restaurant’s menu had tiger prawn (large shrimp) pizzas also and I don’t think prawn on pizza is an ancient Italian standard either.
Methinks there’s some snobbery going on here: non traditional is OK as long as the ingredient is $30 a pound
I do like pineapple on pizza. I don’t usually like sweets on my entree. I don’t like sweet & sour Chinese, or orange marmalade on duck, or honey on ham. But there’s something about pineapple on pizza that really works for me. (And i suppose i like cranberry sauce with almost anything. And it’s sweet.)
But i bet prawns are more traditional than pineapple, because i think you can harvest prawns in Italy, but it’s too cold to grow pineapples there. And i think that “traditionally”, Italians used pizza as a blank slate and put almost anything on it.
That is true, and, depending on the locale, “pizza ai frutti di mare” might be a thing. I have also personally met Italians who were genuinely strict about what ingredients might legitimately go into their local cuisine, so it does not beggar belief that some chef did not want to put pineapples, or chicken, or whatever on a pizza.
Tiger prawns are very big shrimp. The size of a large man’s entire thumb down to the root. ISTM putting that on pizza would require slicing each of them into 6-8 shorter hunks. At which point you sort of lose the point of their impressive size. And could just as well put more ordinary naturally bite-sized shrimp on there.
Leaving them intact would be almost like putting whole link bratwurst on pizza. Funky to look at but not readily edible out of hand.
If it is not on the menu, you can ask, but it does not mean you will get anything you conceivably name. Or was pineapple on the menu in the case in question?
It said he was the head chef, so I have to assume pineapple was not on the menu. (Therefore I am not sure wherefore some big customer put in an order for a load of ham-and-pineapple pizza; I guess that was off the menu, which is simply what I wrote in my previous post.) It sounds like the boss [claims he] told him to offer it, or else.
The guy appealed his firing to the government agency that adjudicates such things. The hearing officer found against him on what amounts to technical grounds: failure to file his claim / appeal timely. So we do not know whether as a matter of law his claim was valid or not.
The fact the restaurant subsequently closed suggests that whether he was fired lawfully or not is kinda moot; his job at that place was doomed anyway.
An interesting note is that the article provides some detail on this Australian immigrant worker visa program. Which seems to require 3 years continuous employment with a single employer to be granted permanent resident status.
Yeah, that’ll weed out shitty workers and shirkers. It also appeals to bosses who want a slave for 3 years.
The boss / owner in this particular case is not obviously evil; he might be a great guy. But the risk is sure there. And meanwhile the cook / chef comes across as quite full of himself and of overweening Italianness. And like many a worker, forgets that being partway up the food chain is not the same as being at the top of the food chain. If you’re in the middle, both giving and taking orders is part of the gig.
A whole bunch of restaurants, perhaps even the majority, do not survive 3 years. It says the chef is now employed at a different Italian restaurant, but I am not sure how that works out for him in terms of that lame visa.
Yeah, if you are catering a big event and the buyer really really wants something that’s easy for you to do, you do it. Especially if the owner tells you to.