yeah but it will be funny as hell, you’ll walk out of the theater laughing your ass off even as you think to yourself, “my brain is broken, why am I laughing, that movie, objectively speaking, was nowhere close to funny”
hand to hand combat scenes WILL utilize the music from the original series (cheesy as ever)
TBH, I wanted one of QTs remaining movies to be Sci-Fi. However, I am not sure an in canon Star Trek movie is the way to do it.
I would pay one hundred dollars to see this movie.
“Machete don’t transport.”
What do they call gagh?
I dunno, I didn’t go to Q’onoS.
“Set phasers to bloody splatter.”
Nope.
“Space Pussy Wagon.”
I shudder at the thought of George Takei being directed by Tarantino…
Perfect username/post combo. A Tarentino Star Trek needs a psycho Scotty. 
Harvey Keitel would make a good Bones.
hmmm, Machete as Bones, I didn’t think about that, I was thinking more of a Machete version of Sulu as sword fighter
“This phaser… this phaser was on your daddy’s belt when he was shot down over Kronos. He was captured, put in a prison camp. He knew that if the Klingons saw the phaser it would be confiscated, taken away. The way your dad looked at it, this phaser was your birthright. He’d be damned if some big greasy knob-head would put their hands on his son’s birthright, so he hid it. So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide something, his ass. For five long years, he hid this phaser up his ass…”
Omigod yes. What would Christopher Walken be made up to look like?
He has to the Captain; imagine him making log entries.
Not Marvin, Wesley.
Samuel L. Jackson has to be in it if only to say,
"I have had it with these motherfuckin’ tribbles on this motherfuckin’ starship!"
Yeah, I know, not a Tarantino flick, but still, it would be pretty badass.
Transphasic torpedo, the best there is, when you absolutely, positively, got to kill every motherfucker in the cube, accept no substitutes.
I think it could be interesting to do it kind of the opposite of Pulp Fiction. PF told multiple overlapping/interlocking stories, but because it told each story at a time it didn’t always show events in chronological order. He could do the reverse with Star Trek; have the characters moving backwards and forwards in time, but present the movie in chronological order. At the beginning of the movie, Spock interrupts Kirk as he’s walking through the corridors of the ship and engages in some idle chit chat. By the end of the movie we find that Spock had traveled back in time specifically to delay the Captain from getting where he was going, ordered by future Kirk to do so, in order to set some event in motion. As we see each character, they may be a future version of themselves acting on information that hasn’t been revealed to the audience yet.
I don’t know if something like that would interest Tarantino, or if he could pull it off, but I like the idea.
I want Picard to make a crack about how long it took him to shake off Riker and make the man take his own ship.
Or how Riker was assigned to a run a salvage ship when Picard retired.
I was gonna make a joke regarding having Michael parks play ranger mcgraw, but then i looked him up and found he just died a few months ago. Now im bummed.