http://reactshare.com/gregorylamb/photos-of-kim-kardashian-courtesy-of-kanye-west/363029
Why would you tweet noodz of your gf to people?
weird af
I’m not going to look at that but I will say, Us Weekly posted a pic of Kim on her way to an “LA art discussion”, wearing a see-through-ish black pantsuit. Yeah, sounds like a real intellectual discussion, when I can see someone’s belly button.
They’re fairly tasteful and not really nudes. One shows a lot of skin, but no naughty bits.
Why not?
Covered up nudes are not nudes.
To riff off of South Park, maybe he’s trying to prove that she isn’t a hobbit?
She’s not his girlfriend; they’re married. He’s showing off photos of her because he knew who she was when he married her.
Some people like to show off
And there we have it for the record, the first time the word “tasteful” was used in a sentence referring to Kin and Kanye.
Well, he’s not married to Taylor Swift and if it’s not Taylor Swift I don’t give a rats ass.
Kim K may not be some people’s cup of tea, but to me she’s extremely attractive.
And she’s Kanye’s dream girl so I don’t have an issue with it. I wouldn’t do it myself, though.
She looks more modest in those, than she does fully clothed sometimes.
As for why, Kanye West is an idiot.
Because KK is famous for being famous. She has no other notable skills or talents.
In order to make a career out of being famous, you must keep your name in the news and, now days, the social media. And to keep the public from getting bored, you need to do something more outrageous every time.
They sat down with their publicity team and said, “What do we need to do next?” They brainstormed a bit and finally somebody said, “Why doesn’t Kanye tweet some almost nude pictures?” This appealed to Kanye’s ego as he thought of himself as a great photographer. And so, the pictures were published.
And just to be clear, they are married. Since the OP seems to think Kim’s just his GF.
A lot of skin? I hope this is a woosh.
Maybe the pictures changed between when you and I looked at the article, but she is wearing absolutely no clothes in any of the pictures, not even earrings. Unless you count hands as clothes…
Nah, I agree with the above, not nude…just skin.
Unless I’m seeing actual naughty bits I’m not considering it a nude
Why else would anyone pay any attention to him?
Shakes fist damn you for beating me to my first thought 
If you aren’t showing naughty bits it’s not really a nude, she’d look exactly the same covered with a bikini as with her hands.
The photos are tasteful. They’re both still horror shows on legs.