WTF? (Obama's speech on violence in the Mideast)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/no-video-justifies-an-attack-on-an-embassy-obama-tells-un/article4566506/

How come nobody told Obama that video has nothing to do with planned attack on embassy?

And he gets to repeat and confirm stupid lie at the UN podium.

WTF!?

I forgot to mention it to him. Sorry.

sigh We’ve been over this before.

Is he just referencing Libya? There were attacks on U.S. embassies in Yemen, Egypt, Sudan, Tunesia, etc.

Well, his speech is understandably mostly about attack in Libya that ended in deaths of Americans peppered with reference to the video. I haven’t noticed a distinction that Libyan attack was pre-planned so one will go away from that speech that it’s all bout video.

I heard Obama used an i before an e, but not after a c. Should we impeach him?

“The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam”. This is far from the first time that I’ve felt ashamed of Obama. He sounded like a mullah.

Not surprising that you’d cherry pick a single quote out of context. Here’s the entire paragraph:

So he’s saying “Hey, these people that slander Muhammed are jerks, but if you’re gonna get pissed off about people slamming him, why aren’t you also getting upset when people shit on the Christians and Jews.”

He’s calling out hypocritical Muslim leaders. What about that makes you ashamed?

He is due for that re: drones but I guess if you base your POTUS preference on idolatry then this is probably useless dicussion to you.

Because slandering Mohammad or Jesus is a perfectly legitimate and proper thing to do. The followers of these old frauds have tortured, persecuted, burned and murdered their way round the globe for centuries and the sooner these ‘prophets’ become historical curiosities the better. If the future really does belong to the Prophet of Islam rather than his ‘slanderers’ then we’re all in fucking trouble.

You must have done really poorly on the “Reading for Comprehension” portion of the SAT.

Obama’s statement was about being against hypocrisy and hate in any form, which - believe it or not - is a good thing for someone to be against.

You sound like a Mullah.

Clearly you operate from the theocratic stand, not I. You belong to the Republican Religion which must find something wrong in any word or deed by it’s opponents and their leader the Anti-Christ Obama. I thought the idea of Romney painting himself brown to appeal to Latinos was as stoopit as your line of reasoning here. If you or your ilk had any new ideas they wouldn’t be getting trounced by an incumbent with a lousy record on the economy. Go back to your church and pray some more, because your efforts to evangelize are reducing your flock.

Obama went on to say this:

I’m glad he’s our president.

Full transcript w/ video:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/09/25/full-text-of-obamas-remarks-to-united-nations/

I’m sure a search of the board would show that you were among those denouncing Bush for regularly invoking Jesus and declaring a national day of mourning for Jerry Falwell, right?

Well, he is technically correct.

He just doesn’t say what “slander” would consist of. Maybe Obama would be fine with calling Mohammed a pedophile warmonger, but is absolutely opposed to calling him a Nazi.

To be fair to aldiboronti, this sentence is about the only thing Rush Limbaugh talked about regarding Obama’s UN speech today, so aldiboronti probably didn’t know there was a whole speech made. :stuck_out_tongue:

[Moderating]
I’ve edited the title of this thread to reflect its subject matter. newcomer, in the future, please try to use more descriptive titles for your threads, so people can have some idea what they’re about before they click on them.
[/Moderating]

By this standard, you must be ashamed of every single American president, ever.

Is that the case?

Spend the day at the beach Aldi and Newcomer? Sure is a lot of sand in your vaginas. Try not to scoot while sitting directly on the sand. <3