Huh, it’s not often you see an admission of trolling done with smilies.
gobear, I think j_kat_251 was referring to Dorothy Parker as the “whiny slut.” I could be wrong, though. It’s kinda hard to tell. And your offer of defending Aries28 is noble. Suffice it to say, though, that of the two of us, I’m the one more likely to need help with defensive measures. She makes a tactical nuclear strike look tame when she’s riled.
And on preview, this has already been ascertained. Crap.
j_kat_251, seriously, what’s going on here? Are you just mad at the world today? Are you attempting to provide the board with another “I was there when Poster X melted down” story?
Calm down, man. Whatever’s going on ain’t worth this level of venom.
Actually, I would be much more entertained if you decided to express yourself through something other than the written word.
Interpretive dance perhaps. The wild flailing about would be much better.
Well, color me confused, but i don’t see anything that would remotely suggest that j_kat needs to be banned.
That thread you linked to was a train-wreck from go to whoa.
Just because you don’t like someone’s posts (and i’m still trying to work out the OP in this thread!) doesn’t necessitate a banning.
Hey I am entertained.
I think the OP has a point that some people may get addicted to love-ins and that love-ins have a negative effect on the subject because they connect moaning about stuff that is a part of normal life with hugs and stuff. As I say they get addicted to this and the next time they meet someone they start moaning to them about previous people treating them like shit, and the new guy-girl gets extremely bored and fed-up with the whining quickly and decides to give the whiner another love-in opportunity by dumping them (actually is the OP’s point or mine?) .
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED? ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
Er, no. I mean, yes, I am not entertained.
Aldebaran, Zanthor, now this. What, is it National Putz Week or something?
If this were a bar you’d have been cut off an hour ago. Go home and sleep it off, j_kat_251.
Hey, does anyone have a good potato soup recipe? I’m having a dinner party in a couple weeks and thought it might be a nice starter.
Not liking someone’s post does not = banning.
Being a complete and total jerk to other posters for no apparent reason however… hmmmm…
Barks, as in -ing mad, i.e. at the moon. Implication: its creator is bonkers in the nut.
Ooh…ooh…I do. I do.
Do you want me to email it to you on Monday when I get back in the office?
** mhendo** See here for admission of trolling…
Interpretation:
“And here’s me smiling envisioning everyone else angry AND/OR confused.”
He’s happy he’s pissing people off.
I thought it was homophobe propaganda that you were all out to convert us God-fearin’ women-fuckers. But no matter what I say you seem to try and bring up the fact that I **might **be gay. “Hey, see an ad mentioning gays? YOU PROBABLY SECRETLY LOVE COCK.” Actually, no, I don’t. Now, sure you’d enjoy it, but you can take me off your potential recruit list.
I live in Australia, where you don’t get beaten and killed for being gay, just Aboriginal, which is why there’s a gaymatchmaker service. That’s what I get for watching “Big Brother Up Late” though.
And yeah: Parker != Roosevelt. My mistake there, a grevious error I am likely to commit again in future.
Here I bold this part for the SUPER HAPPY LUCKY FUN BOX approval of Particlewill
**
By the way: My intent was not to get a reaction from people. Really. I just pictured some guy becoming infuriated by something I said, a short while after I had said it. Like expressing your opinion on nachos and then realising the rabid pro-KFC nut down the street is likely to be foaming at the mouth. You didn’t set out to piss him off by dissing KFC, but you wanted to make knowledge of your nacho love known to all and sundry. You might want to watch those accusations. I might want to watch my big fucking mouth. We should both wait for any offical recommendation before taking advice though.
**
Interpretive dance: in a word, yes. I could then apply for a government grant for my avant garde art which challenges society’s view of the dissenter. A thorough examination of the role of the pariah in a post-modern disillusioned world. Or: fuck that.
Previous threads in which I have made an appearance: She said she saw auras, for God’s sake. If there’s one mark of a psycho girl, it’s the adoption of the attention-grabbing practices that the mystickal underworld provides.
Also: extremity. I wasn’t aware this kind of vitriol was like a spike in the reading of the bile-o-meter in this fine pit. If it is, I may have to resort to toning it down. That’d suck. And yeah, I write like an angry drunk.
Penultimately: barking. I should have figured that you wuz a Brit. Yes, I am quite mad, been mad for fucking years. But there’s no dark side of the moon really, matter of fact it’s all dark.
Finally: I’m going to bed. And I’m still exactly as fuckin’ cool as that emoticon describes. Orange face, Lennon shades, I’ve got it made, baby. I sleep with them on, in the dark. That’s how you know you’re famous, sunglasses at night. For real.
Perhaps when he awakes, the acid will have worn off…
No, you fucking can’t, brainiac. One more insult like that, and you’re out of here.
If you’re mad at the world for no apparent reason, buy a boxing ball. If you’re mad at a fellow Doper, be specific.
The BBQ Pit is not a replacement for psychiatric help, or your daily intake of valium.
And this thread was too stupid to live anyway, so it’s closed now.
In re banning, I don’t know if the little nimrod should be banned, but the “shut up, fag” ought to draw some censure.
Indeed, although he could accompany that flailing by singing “Aheme! Sorge il Tremendo” (the mad scene from Lucia Di Lammermoor).
Merely seeing an ad? No gay quotient there. Getting all hot and bothered by said ad, not to mention the previous fantasy of being whipped by another guy?
Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt, sugar.
Not everyone shows up to offer hugs and encouragement in a thread. Some do, but those who don’t…well…they don’t! The masses still sit to the side, not offering blind support…not caring to risk be ignorant because they don’t know the whole story (or the other side of the story).
It’s the nature of threads that they tend to draw in people who sympathize and believe the person…they believe the OP posting is being honest. Some offer support because they’ve seen posters who act a bit suicidal.
In any event, don’t judge the group (the SDMBers) by the actions of a few over -ympathetic & very trusting few.
I’d recommend you call out that type of poster and invite them to the pit. Obviously, you must know some examples, so find them and get it going.
Otherwise, you are perpetuating ignorance, and that is the opposite of what we are trying to accomplish here.
Thanks.
And gobear, what’s the point in reporting a post when you’re just going to feed the flames some more?