You be the judge

Monty-

Meet me in the pit. Hell meet me in person.
I’d like to talk to you about eradicating ignorance. Maybe Real late term abortions?
You make me sick. You are always attempting to correct someone. Get some corrective VISION. David did receive evidence, just not enough to suit his purpose. Yes my account was banned (so I am correct) but in error (so um that nullifies your statement). And SDMB posters did in fact call his home. So his privacy was invaded. So now that we all see you just dont know SHIT, see ya.

“You and I” can go out and see how much you like corrective actions for your attitude my “little” friend.

I’m ending all comments here otherwise Monty will chase himself into knots trying to figure out which ones his ass and which ones the hole in the ground.

-G

It’s now 8:53 EST. This means, at best, you have seven minutes to make your 6:00 PM time commitment, if you’re in the continental United States – and at worst, that you’ve missed it by two hours and fifty-three minutes.

This is just a friendly reminder.

  • Rick

[Moderator Hat: ON]

Gigoloman said:

And:

Ok, COOL IT – NOW! We will not stand for insults. We will certainly not stand for threats. That should be abundantly clear by now.


David B, SDMB Great Debates Moderator

[Moderator Hat: OFF]

Wish I knew what the hell was going on. Gigoloman, I received only two emails from Mickey. I responded to him that he should not take any of this lightly and that he should speak to the moderator, David. He did that. He asked David to cancel his account and David forwarded that request on. I don’t see what David did wrong in this situation.

I do think that someone called this guys work and house. I think that is a shitty thing to do, and very damn unnecessary. I wish Mickey would come back.


Things are not what they seem to be; nor are they otherwise.
[lankavatara Sutra]

David-

I see no threat here, and lets stop making “threats” out of every day comments. If yesterdays events with Mike were allowed to so easily pass by, then todays comments by me, should find no ill will from anyone.
I cant even see a veiled threat, what is seen is a topic for debate at most an innuendo that Monty isnt nearly all the man he acts to be here, and that in a public setting he would never be so eager to “battle” everyone.

-G

John John-

I think he may consider it, but after quite a long break. I got an email from him today, said he is still being called, and that the SPD was getting involved. Oh Well huh?

-G

Sorry, I’m a latecomer here from the Are men the cause of wars and violence thread. Is Gigoloman the boy scout formerly known as MikeylikesIT?

[Genuine question, not an allegation]

[Moderator Hat: ON]

Gigoloman said:

Don’t bullshit me. The threats were there and were obvious: “Meet me in the pit. Hell meet me in person.
I’d like to talk to you about eradicating ignorance. Maybe Real late term abortions?” And: “‘You and I’ can go out and see how much you like corrective actions for your attitude my ‘little’ friend.”

Either cut it out now, or you will find yourself removed from this message board. That is my threat. We’ve had too much of this bullshit going on recently and none of the administrators are in the mood for any more. Neither am I.

So, like I said. Cool it. Now. If you have anything more to say on this topic, take it to e-mail.


David B, SDMB Great Debates Moderator

[Moderator Hat: OFF]

In response to Gigoloman, Monty posted:

Your grammar is slipping. Obviously “liars” should read a liar.


Sue from El Paso

Experience is what you get when you didn’t get what you wanted.

Hey, Mikey, anything you post on the message board cannot reasonably, by any definition, be said to be “between you and David.” If it was, you’d have kept it to private e-mail. Get a clue.


“It’s my considered opinion you’re all a bunch of sissies!”–Paul’s Grandfather

Sue:

You’re right. Now that I’ve retired from teh Navy, I tend to forget grammar on occasions.

Oh, well.

“You be the judge” sure sounds like fun. Let’s try this (Melin, please let me know what errors of courtroom procedure I’ve made):

{Note: all bolding in this posting is mine.}

In the thread at http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum7/HTML/001018.html , Mikey (I’m assuming here that Mikey & Gig are one and the same poster, MPD aside) posted:

(I’m assuming also that “OA” in this quote refers to the Order of the Arrow.)

Mikey also posted in this thread,

From the Order of the Arrow’s Blue Heron Lodge #349 web page at http://va-oa.org :

And from the Scouts’ own web page at http://www.scouting.org/factsheets/02-503a.html we find:

As the Order of the Arrow’s stated purpose is to recognize those who exemplify the Scout Oath and Law, I ask of you all to “be the judge:”

With all the lies, threats, and insults Mikey/Gig has posted here in recent days,

(a) Is he:
(1) An Eagle Scout?
(2) Arrowman (Member of the Order of the Arrow)?
(3) Scout leader?
(4) None of the above?

(b) or should he be
(1) An Eagle Scout?
(2) Arrowman (Member of the Order of the Arrow)?
(3) Scout leader?
(4) None of the above?

With the continued assertion by Gig that something that did not happen did happen (and to someone else), I’m going with answers (a)(4) AND (b)(4).

As an actual member of the Order of the Arrow myself and formerly Fist Class Scout (I left scouting to join DeMolay http://www.demolay.org because I really didn’t have time for both; wish I did though), I consider this posting my good deed for today. How’d I do, Melin?

I just noticed that “GigoloMan” (with a capital M) and “Gigoloman” (with a lower-case m) are different accounts. The one with the capital M shows up on page 2 of this thread as “unregistered”, while the one with the lower-case m shows up on page 3 of this thread as a “member”.

Perhaps that was what Gigoloman was ranting about when he spoke of someone “banning” his account.


The truth, as always, is more complicated than that.

Tracer, see my post from yesterday at 1:40 PM in this thread.

Folks, I think it’s reasonably evident that Gigoloman = GigoloMan = MikeylikesIT = FORMERAGENT, etc. I’ve banned this account but the guy, who is obviously a prankster with a lot of time on his hands, will likely show up again in some new persona soon. Short of banning hotmail and similar free e-mail registrations altogether, I can only suggest that you ignore contentious posts from a new user who wants to reopen this whole issue - it’s probably him. Pls notify David, TUBADIVA, or me if he shows up.

Boo :slight_smile: