[QUOTE=Revenant Threshold]
They can probably be got for “damaging human remains” or whatever that crime is called.
[/QUOTE]
In Japan (back in the early 1990s), when someone got charged with murder they were also charged with abandoning the corpse. What? They expect the killer the carry the bod around?
Guys, guys. Why should we judge those whose sexual preferences are different from ours? How would you like it if you were in their situation? Huh? Huh?
(Besides, it’s not like the corpse said “No”)
[QUOTE=Smeghead]
Necrophilia! Crack open a cold one!
I so rarely get a chance to use that line.
[/QUOTE]
Only on the SDMB would you get such an opportunity.
And only this* once.* Don’t do it again or we’ll kill you, then ravish your corpse, and post about it on the board in all it’s gory and graphic detail, including the size of yer’ willie. 
[QUOTE=Little Nemo]
But sometimes you just have to accept that you’ve missed your window of opportunity and move on.
[/QUOTE]
That’s quitter talk!
*Chapter Fifteen - Beginning Necromancy.
Lesson One: Proper Shovel Usage*.
-Joe, doing Discworld from memory
[QUOTE=mhendo]
The poor family must be thinking, “What next?”
[/QUOTE]
Fucking with three more corpses, perhaps?
[QUOTE=Boyo Jim]
They allegedly bought condoms on the way to the cemetary.
[/QUOTE]
Well, this explains the skanky guys I occasionally sell condoms to at Walgreens. I’m taking their money and I’m thinkin’, “No woman would voluntarily have sex with that, they must be payin’ for it…” So, maybe not.
[QUOTE=Revtim]
The article doesn’t mention the most important fact of the story: was she hot?
[/QUOTE]
Only if they baked her first.
<Bosda SLAPS EVERYBODY IN THIS THREAD with a Wet Trout>
Now go home! And wash your hands!
[QUOTE=athelas]
Guys, guys. Why should we judge those whose sexual preferences are different from ours? How would you like it if you were in their situation? Huh? Huh?
(Besides, it’s not like the corpse said “No”)
[/QUOTE]
Oh, STFU, bigot. Your veiled agenda attempt is as inept as your mental abilitity to discern actions.
[QUOTE=stpauler]
Oh, STFU, bigot. Your veiled agenda attempt is as inept as your mental abilitity to discern actions.
[/QUOTE]
Uhh… what?
I’m missing something here…
-FrL-
stpauler, are you…medicated?
If not, perhaps you should consider it.
rumages for stickies and big red pen to scribble note to self
Do not tell weirdos at bar that I’d have to be dead before I fucked them as I might one day have to fulfil that promise.
[QUOTE=Bosda Di’Chi of Tricor]
<Bosda SLAPS EVERYBODY IN THIS THREAD with a Wet Trout>
Now go home! And wash your hands!
[/QUOTE]
And be sure to get that dirt out from underneath your fingernails!
[QUOTE=stpauler]
Oh, STFU, bigot. Your veiled agenda attempt is as inept as your mental abilitity to discern actions.
[/QUOTE]
One of us got whoosed. I suspect it was you.
[QUOTE=Bosda Di’Chi of Tricor]
<Bosda SLAPS EVERYBODY IN THIS THREAD with a Wet Trout>
Now go home! And wash your hands!
[/QUOTE]
Brains, not hands. With bleach.
[QUOTE=Boyo Jim]
The relevant charge of 3rd degree sexual assaul in WI is found here in Section 940.225. The briefest summary I can figure for it is “sexual intercourse with a person without consent.” I did find a “key definition” of “consent” that referenced unconsciousness or sleep, but not death. I will look into the definition of a “person” – so far I haven’t found the accepted legal definition in the WI statutes.
[/QUOTE]
If you look at the section you linked, subsection (7) provides:
Just reading that provison sqicks me out.
What if the victim is undead?
No, seriously.
What if a space probe cames back from exploring Venus, and suddenly the dead rise from the grave – and they’re really horny?
Where are your precious laws for that, hmm?
[QUOTE=DrDeth]
Brains, not hands. With bleach.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=tdn]
What if the victim is undead?
No, seriously.
What if a space probe cames back from exploring Venus, and suddenly the dead rise from the grave – and they’re really horny?
Where are your precious laws for that, hmm?
[/QUOTE]
This Thread is going into veeerrrry unsafe territory.
[QUOTE=Billdo]
If you look at the section you linked, subsection (7) provides:
Just reading that provison sqicks me out.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe I’ve watched too much Law & Order, but it makes sense. For example, if someone raped and killed a woman, and they couldn’t prove that the rape came first, they could argue that they can’t be charged with rape.