NFL Predictions – Week 3 (Clarity)

OK, folks. I’m trying out a new format here. I was wasting too much time re-typing and formatting the stuff I’d try and C/P from websites. We’re going to go with straight up twitchy gambler style. If you’re unfamiliar, here’s the deal. HOME TEAM is in caps. Favorite is on the left. Point spread is in between the teams, and the over-under is to the far right.

We’ve got our first set of teams with a bye week. They are: Baltimore, Detroit, Houston, Washington. Think any of these teams are enjoying their time off? I’m sure Gibbs slept well for a little bit, but they haven’t exactly been dominant. The others? Bet TUMS sales are through the roof.

Now, here’s to hoping that my percentages improve. We’ve got 2 games under our belts, and as a result we know a little bit more about the quality of most of these teams. Hope everyone is enjoying themselves, and feel free to chime in tell me I’m a jackass every once in a while.

Here’s the past threads if anyone wants to follow along.

NFL Predictions - Week 1

NFL Predictions - Week 2

Onward and upward.

Sunday, Sept. 25
**ST LOUIS (-6½) Tennessee O/U: 45½ **
The Rams have played for shit this season, and the Titans are coming of a pretty solid win. Statistically the Rams are pretty far out front of the Titans on offense, and they are 14 and 15 respectively on defense. Looking at the opponents, I think it’s safe to say that the Titans have played a tougher schedule. The Rams schedule so far might have the weakest 2 games any team has ever played….and they are only 1-1. It all comes down to whether Martz is smart enough to realize that a persistent running game will beat the Titans. The most telling thing I see is that the Titan’s have yet to sustain a scoring drive since the first possession of the season. Of course they’ve played two top notch defenses, but it has to make you nervous when a team hasn’t mustered anything consistent against a team that will probably put up at least 24 points this week. Past performances favor the Titans, but we’ve all seen the Rams run up 40 in the dome. Call this one a crap shoot. In the end, I’m taking the good coach over the crappy one.

The pick: Titans, Under

**PHILADELPHIA (-7½) Oakland O/U: 47 **
All everyone is going to talk about is Moss and TO. When it comes down to it, neither guy will decide things. The difference is going to be the Louie Anderson soft middle of the Oakland line versus Philly’s ground game. I’d feel better if they had a good between the tackles guy, but Westbrook will get it done. Another factor is going to be the number of mistakes Collins makes. Philly’s D will capitalize. Statistically, both teams are at opposite ends of the spectrum in just about every category. Frankly, with the game in Philly I see little reason for the spread to be as low as it is.

The pick: Eagles, Over

**Cincinnati (-3) CHICAGO O/U: 40 **
Tough game for me to judge. I sorta went into things here in this post. The Bears have played really well, much better than people realize. The Bengals have looked unstoppable, but upon closer examination they haven’t exactly been firmly tested. Certainly not by a team with a top flight defense. The Bears D could force Palmer and company fits and create several turnovers. Of course, that would put the pressure on the Bears offense to hold up its end which could be a long shot. Love Chaz’s game, but the Bears secondary is really really good. The Cincy D hasn’t played very well against a pair of teams with average offenses, that could allow Thomas Jones room to operate. I’m going to be a homer and pick the Bears to defense the house.

The pick: Bears, Under

**N.Y. JETS (NL) Jacksonville O/U: NL **
Well, I’ve said it once, and I’ll say it again. At least until Ellis Dee goes postal. The Jets suck. No line on the game due to Leftwich’s status. I won’t spend too much time discussing this one now and will reassess if the spread comes up. Briefly, I think the Jags need to be very concerned about the loss of Darius. CuMar is expected to play, though I think the Jags will contain him. I’m guessing the Jets will be a 3 point fave if Byron plays, and if so, I like the Jags to get it done on the road behind a big day from Fragile Freddy.

The pick: Jags, tentatively

**MINNESOTA (-3½) New Orleans O/U: 44½ **
I have a hard time picturing Minny favored over anyone, but after the mess the Saints left (understandably of course) last week I suppose it’s reasonable. I think it’s pointless to look at the numbers going into this one. New Orleans could do anything, and the Vikings can’t be as inept on offense as they’ve looked. Both could be called walking anomalies. No way that the Saints make that many unforced errors, and the Vikes won’t stop Deuce. Then again, Culpepper could return to form back inside the comfort of the dome. I’m going to take a chance and believe the Saints when they say they were effected by the MNF spectacle and assume they are more like that week one team here.

The pick: Saints, Over

**Carolina (-3) MIAMI O/U: 36½ **
Well, I think that 3 point spread is pretty damn insulting for the Panthers. They come off a big win against the champs. They are visiting a team that just got beaten badly last week, not by a powerhouse either. Statistically these teams are very even, similar offense and defense. The difference between them, as I see it, is the running game. So far Brown hasn’t shown much and while Saban keeps pounding it they aren’t getting much per attempt, only 2.7 yards. In contrast the Panthers backs are up to 4.2 and 4.9 yards respectively. Those are the kinds of numbers I love.

The pick: Panthers, Over

**INDIANAPOLIS (-13½) Cleveland O/U: 47 **
Wow, big number. Indy has sputtered offensively so far, and here’s they’re expecting them to drop a bomb on the Browns? That’s what I call forgiving. Granted, I see very little room to rationalize a Browns win here, but the question is how productive will the Indy O be? Eh, who am I kidding. They will blow the doors off, Cleveland hasn’t stopped anyone giving up 55% on 3rd downs and over 430 yards a game.

The pick: Colts, Under

**BUFFALO (NL) Atlanta O/U: NL **
Another off game. Vick’s status is uncertain. I like the Bills at home, all things being equal. Buffalo shuts down the pass, and while they’ve been run on, I don’t know that you can be totally one dimensional and go win on the road. We’ll check in later when the line comes up.

The pick: Bills, tentatively

**Tampa Bay (-3½) GREEN BAY O/U: 37½ **
Ok, I need to try and contain myself. Be objective. Don’t gloat. Deep breaths……

The Packers and Favre are 3 and a half point dogs at home, against the Bucs, you don’t see that very often do ya? The Pack D has been so awful that they made Joey Harrington look good. Can you believe that miss a bum like Al Harris? How happy are the guys who drafted Cadillac in their FF leagues? Me? Um, I drafted JJ Arrington. What are you looking at! You should probably expect another huge day from him when he lines up against these guys. Fact of the matter is that the only way the Packers are winning games this year is if they can outscore the opponent. Considering how Favre has played, a 76.1 rating so far, that’s not likely. Just for fun, Brian Griese has a rating of 82.9. [sub]Just for kicks, Peyton is at 74.7 and Orton is at 74.4. :eek:[/sub] If the Bucs are for real, this game will be a walk.

The pick: Bucs, Over

**SEATTLE (-6) Arizona O/U: 41½ **
I hate trying to figure out what the Seahawks are gonna do. I always expect them to play well, being prepared for them to just pound the ball on some poor sap. Then they suck, week after week. Finally I quit on them and then they go on a 4 game win streak. Hasselbeck has been as expected. Alexander is putting up big yards. The defense is 11th overall. Why exactly are they so damn iffy? Arizona on the other hand has just screwed the pooch after being everyone’s sleeper darling. The complete lack of a running game has been a major issue. Their defense has played unexpectedly well, and are solidly in the top ten in every category except rushing. Of course they are playing Alexander this week, I don’t expect that ranking to improve. Honestly, I think Seattle will win this game, but 6 points feels like a little too much. I reserve the right to change my mind on this game….

The pick: Arizona, Over

**PITTSBURGH (-3) New England O/U: 42 **
The game of the week. You’re not going to believe it, but I’m going to pick against the champs not once, but twice in a row. This time I’m upping the stakes and betting against them at home! I said it after week one, and I’ll say it again now. They are soft against the run in the middle. Not what you want to be against Pittsburgh. I do however expect this to be a rather low scoring game. Neither teams passing game will be dynamic. Each team will come out cautious and measured. In the end I think both teams play relatively mistake free. Frankly I don’t think Dillon can carry the load against this front. I know that Belichick will certainly have something cute up his sleeve for Big Ben, but with the pressure of the playoffs gone and a little more experience I think he’ll continue to play steady enough for Parker to rush them to the win.

The pick: Steelers, Under

**Dallas (-6½) SAN FRANCISCO O/U: 41 **
Big D getting a TD on the road? Last time SF played at home they took down the Rams, the Cowboys haven’t exactly dominated the teams they’ve played. Seems like it might be a stretch. One thing that SF has managed to do this season is contain the run, and that’s Dallas’ strength. Two immeasurable factors that I think come into play. First, Parcells has been beating the shit out of his guys after folding last week. They’ll be foaming at the mouth. The other, San Fran got flat out humiliated last week after getting a little uppity following the good start. Their confidence has to be pretty well shaken. That’s enough for me.

The pick: Cowboys, Under

**SAN DIEGO (-5½) N.Y. Giants O/U: 42 **
Do we finally figure out if the Giants are legit or not? No more games where they get a dozen turnovers, special teams TDs and ridiculous field position? Will Schottenheimer manage to get his guys to play a clean, complete game? The oddsmakers obviously agree with the assessment that the Giants aren’t totally credited with their record so far. It’s not often that a 0-2 teams is favored by nearly a TD over a 2-0 team. The Giants are near the bottom in every offensive category, however the Chargers haven’t been much better. Defensively, the Giants are at the bottom too. Now they are going away from home for the first time, and have to find a way to step it up. I’m going to follow my instincts on this one and figure the Chargers get this must-win game.

The pick: Chargers, Over

Monday, Sept. 26
**DENVER (-3) Kansas City O/U: 48 **
I really couldn’t tell you what I think of the Broncos. I can tell you they probably shouldn’t be favored over the Chiefs after that display against the Dolphins. They were consistently passed on by Gus Frerotte. Soak that in for a second. Then of course Brees came in a laid a turd at Mile High. I’m blaming San Diego’s ineptness for that. Which frankly is making me rethink the previous pick, but back to the topic at hand. Two convincing wins by the Chiefs give me the confidence to pick them to go into the mountains and grab a win. The Chiefs rush defense was pretty stout in both games and if they put the game in Plummer’s hands you can always feel pretty confident in the outcome.

The pick: Cheifs, Over

Before I make my picks, I must take umbrage with this synopsis. Which defensive stats are you going by when you say the Giants are near the bottom? Pass defense is a given, but history (and common sense) shows that good teams play with a lead, causing the opponents to throw every play, causing an artificial increase in passing yards against. Granted, Big Blue is having trouble defending the pass, but I’d say that’s only half the issue. The other half is a combination of stopping the run – forcing a one-dimensional passing attack – and playing with a lead.

But what about in all those meaningful categories? You dismiss the turnovers as if the Giants didn’t have anything to do with them. Remember last year before 17 guys went down on IR? The games against Cleveland, Dallas, and Washington? Same deal; 5+ turnovers per game. That’s what the Giants do.

How about the ground game? Aren’t the Giants leading the league in run defense? They have yet to let up a singl rushing TD. What about sacks? Surely the G-Men aren’t “near the bottom” in sacks, right? (Strahan is a half sack away from a tie for leading the league.) And turnovers, if you don’t dismiss them, are one of the most effective means of being successful on defense. Or is defense nothing but passing yards against? I’d also point out that most of those passing yards are between the twenties…the Giants have let up exactly two offensive touchdowns…one per game. How is this “near the bottom”?

Nobody gives the Giants credit. Not one sportscaster has picked them to win yet, and they are 2-0. The gamblers seemed to know what was up, with them being favored in both games. But now even the gamblers have bought into the anti-hype.

Airman’s thread (I think) had somebody complaining about all sports fans feeling their teams weren’t respected. I tell you, the Giants are truly one of the more disrespected teams there are.

If Big Blue travels all the way across country after a short week and beats the desperate Chargers, will we then get respect? Hell no. The storyline will be that the Chargers are in trouble. Or that they gave the game away. Or anything you can imagine, just so long as nobody ever pays the Giants a single goddamn compliment.

Keep it up, world, and I’ll continue to laugh every week while the Giants stick it to their opponents.

1:00pm…RAMS…6½…Titans…45½Rams should be able to handle the Titans.
1:00pm…**EAGLES…7½…Raiders…47…**The Raiders should cover.
1:00pm…**Bengals…3…BEARS…40…**Good game. Too good to put any action on.
1:00pm…**JETS…2½…Jags…34…**Jets too inconsistent. Bet the under.
1:00pm…VIKINGS…3½…Saints…44½Saints rebound with the win. Bet the under.
1:00pm…Panthers…3…DOLPHINS…36½Strange spread. Panthers are a mortal lock.
1:00pm…**COLTS…13½…Browns…47…**Way too many points. Run away!
1:00pm…BILLS…3…Falcons…36½Billies and the over.
1:00pm…Bucs…3½…PACKERS…37½Bucs in a landslide.

4:05pm…SEAHAWKS…6…Cards…41½Cards and the over. Way over.
4:05pm…**Cowboys…6½…49ERS…41…**Cowboys and the under.
4:15pm…**STEELERS…3…Patriots…42…**Pats bounce back, and the over looks good.

8:30pm…**CHARGERS…5½…Giants…42…**Giants and the over, both easily.
9:00pm…**BRONCOS…3…Chiefs…48…**Have to take action on MNF, so take the under.

You might notice that I dug up the lines for the Falcons @ Bills and Jags @ Jets games. Not liking the fact that there are only three late games; that complicates things. Oh well, here goes…

Early Games
Risk 55 for 120 on the Panthers & Bucs

Late Games
Risk 30 for 60 on the Pats & the Over

Sunday Night
If down 85, risk 55 for 120 on the Giants & the Over, or else
Risk 55 for 50 on the Giants

Monday Night
If down 140, risk 55 for 120 on the Chiefs & the under, or else
Risk 30 for 25 on the Under

Standing
Last week: no action
Season: 6-11, -35

This is an ugly, ugly week. I’m not confident in these picks, especially where I picked against a home team underdog – that never goes well. Can I just say again how happy I am that I don’t bet on football anymore? I’d be all agita, all the time.

Nice coding, Ellis Dee! How’d you get the columns to stay in place without using code or positional codes?

As for the picks, the only pick I care about this week at this point is Bucs v GB. I’d still be a bit leary about taking the over in that one.

FYI: The Steelers are the home team this week, so you’re picking against the champs on the road. Not that it matters, Pittsburgh could beat them in the Razor too. :slight_smile:

Neat trick. He used . characters between the words, then made them color white so you can’t see them.

So the first line of his table with all the coding removed is really:

1:00pm…RAMS…6½…Titans…45½…Rams should be able to handle the Titans.

Yeah…they could, but if I recall, the last time they met, they didn’t. Of course, the time before that they did, but who cares about that? :stuck_out_tongue:

None of the pools I’m in utilize spreads, so I’m just going to toss in my straight-up picks:

BUF
MIA
CIN
IND
NYJ
MIN
PHI
TB
STL
SEA
SF
PIT
NYG
DEN

I’ve stated it everywhere else, so I might as well throw it in here too: I guarantee a minimum of 12 out of 14 correct picks this week. Absolutely, 100% guarantee it.

So ewe say.

I’m going to do straight picks as well, with a little commentary.

Sunday, Sept. 25
ST LOUIS (-6½) Tennessee O/U: 45½

Like Omni I don’t think the Rams have faced a good team yet. I’m taking the Titans with the Rams keeping it close.

PHILADELPHIA (-7½) Oakland O/U: 47

The Riaders will have 16 penaties and lose. But you know, it’s not just penaties that kill the Raiders. The Raiders have effectively given up on the fist 20-30 years of play from the Iine of scrimmage, having a vertical game is fine, but everybody knows that’s what the Raiders are about. You need those underneath routes and a running game. I predict that in 2006 the Raiders will be shopping for a coach and Quaterback. Philly by pair of touchdowns.

Cincinnati (-3) CHICAGO O/U: 40

I almost want to call this one for Chicago because their at home and they played so well. I just don’t trust the offense to keep them in this one. Cincy in a squeeker.

N.Y. JETS (NL) Jacksonville O/U: NL

Jets, because their at home.

MINNESOTA (-3½) New Orleans O/U: 44½

I will not pick another Vikings victory until they win, and maybe not even then. Ok, that’s harsh, but I have yet to see them look anything but horrid, the Saints by contrast look as if they finally have some leadership. Saints.

Carolina (-3) MIAMI O/U: 36½

I think Carolina has the better overall unit. Carolina.
INDIANAPOLIS (-13½) Cleveland O/U: 47

This week we will be rerunning the SF/Phily game. Due to prior commitments the Niners will be payed by the Browns. Indy.
BUFFALO (NL) Atlanta O/U: NL

The Falcons are still too one dimensional; or is that one player? Buffalo.

Tampa Bay (-3½) GREEN BAY O/U: 37½

Favre is starting to look his age, Tampa Bay.

SEATTLE (-6) Arizona O/U: 41½

My tendency when picking between NFC WEST matchups this year has been to pick the home team. I see no reason tho change that formula now. Seattle.

PITTSBURGH (-3) New England O/U: 42

I hate betting against the Pats, but if you gotta do it, do it when they’re playing the Steelers. Pittsburgh.

Dallas (-6½) SAN FRANCISCO O/U: 41

It’s 9 o’clock Monday night, Dallas is up 13-0, Dallas has the ball, Prison Break is about to start, it’s 4 and something left to play, eh, this game is over I swith to Fox. How in the hell do you let Santana Moss get behind your defense not once but twice in the final four minutes? How do you give Washington the ball twice in that time period? Meanwhile on the left coast, well we all know what happened last week to the Niners. Whose been doing more swearing this week, Nolan or Parcells? Is there any risk of overdose from Tums? The Niners are not as good as they looked against St. Louis and not as bad as they looked against Philly. Niners, because thery’re at home.

SAN DIEGO (-5½) N.Y. Giants O/U: 42

NY is running on all cylinders, San Diego isn’t. Giants.

Monday, Sept. 26
DENVER (-3) Kansas City O/U: 48
Now we see who’ll own the AFC West. I think KC is the better team. KC

Ah…week 3. The week of clarity. Well, I’ve been too busy lately for real weekly predictions. I’ll share what I picked in my pool and perhaps add a nugget of commentary as well.

Sunday, Sept. 25
**ST LOUIS (-6½) Tennessee **
I look at the Titans running game and realize something, they don’t really have one. You won’t need Sweetness to run on this Defens though. Assuming Chris Brown is feeling better than “questionable,” he should be able to establish a running game. Watch for that fact to force the Rams into extra passing situations. Watch for Bulger to get it done. Sometimes, talent just overcomes crappy coaching.

The pick: Rams
PHILADELPHIA (-7½) Oakland
Kerry Collins has looked pretty good…he hasn’t even thrown a pick yet. The Wide Outs will get the headlines, but the defenses will decide the game. Specifically, the Eagles defense will protect their house and smack around the Raiders making things a bit desparate in Oakland.

The pick: Eagles
**Cincinnati (-3) CHICAGO **
Carson Palmer is starting to look like the real deal. Aiding in his upswing is WR Chad Johnson putting his money where his mouth is. The Bears defense has stepped up, but they won’t be able to contain Johnson & Johnson (as in Rudi). Cinci begins their march to playoffs as Bear fans watch in horror.

The pick: Bengals
N.Y. JETS (-2½) Jacksonville
Omni might keep saying it untill I go postal too, but it matters not. The Jets not only do not suck, but they should be able to pull this game out. True, Pennington has thrown the ball like an 11 year old, and Curtis Martin is banged up…but the defense is getting it back together. Look for the Jets to force Leftwich to beat them, and for Leftwich to come up short.

The pick: Jets
MINNESOTA (-3½) New Orleans O/U: 44½
The Saints are in a bad mood. Do you believe that the Saints cheerleaders were brought to Giants stadium on Monday? Sheesh. That being said, they are not as bad as team we saw Monday night. Brooks & Co. were good enough to push through a win in Carolina, they’ll be more than good enough to do the same to the Vikes. Nasty Nate Burleson’s got a bum knee, which won’t help matters. Daunte throws another 13 or so picks and the Saints win.

The pick: Saints
**Carolina (-3) MIAMI **
Panthers smash!!!

The pick: Panthers
**INDIANAPOLIS (-13½) Cleveland **
It’s a big number, but I’ll take it. Look for the Colts to make this a laugher early.

The pick: Colts
**BUFFALO (-2½) Atlanta **
It looks like Vick is going to play. Logic says the Bills should be able to stop Atlanta’s offense at home, but there is something illogical about this one. Vick isn’t a horrible QB, he’s an inconsistent QB. He’s average until that occasional game where he’s sensational. Look for the sensational to turn into a big game this week, the likes of which the Falcons won’t see for another 3 or 4 weeks, or months.

The pick: Falcons
**Tampa Bay (-3½) GREEN BAY **
The Packers look woeful this season. I’m predicting Favre’s streak of consecutive starts ends this year. That being said, look for the football gods to show mercy on him this week. Mr. Cadilac has looked great so far, but the Green Bay defense shall step up on the not-really-cold-yet tundra and keep him out of the end zone.

The pick: The Pack
SEATTLE (-6) Arizona
The battle of the angry, but not very fearsome birds on their helmets. Remember when Kurt Warner was unstoppable? Ah…memories. I think he recaptures a little of his former magic to overcome a big game from Shaun Alexander & the Seahawks.

The pick: Arizona
PITTSBURGH (-3) New England
Is there something wrong with the champs? The Panthers took care of business last week, and the Raiders kept things interesting. I wonder if all the talk of the Pats losing their coordinators is worth listening to. The Pats just don’t look right. The Steelers look pretty good though. Willie Parker looks even better.

The pick: Steelers
Dallas (-6½) SAN FRANCISCO
Dallas was humiliated by that loss last week. Expect the niner’s to feel the Tuna’s wrath.

The pick: Cowboys
SAN DIEGO (-5½) N.Y. Giants
Although I think good things are destined for Big Blue this season, it doesn’t start here. San Deigo needs a win before the season starts to slip away. Eli cracks under the pressure, Tomlinson reminds everyone that he’s the best player in the league, and the Chargers fans get to cheer about beating the #1 pick who spurned them.

The pick: Chargers
Monday, Sept. 26
**DENVER (-3) Kansas City **
Denver should be able to keep the ball out of Trent Greens hands at home. They’ll also keep it out of Priest Holmes’ hands, and Dante Hall’s hands…Ah screw it. Now that I look at it, I want to change my pick! No matter, I took the Broncos and I’ll stand by that. They…um…are usually…um…pretty good at home? Bah! Call it a hunch and give me the Broncos.

The pick: Broncos

I’m still alive in my survivor pool, and I took The Eagles this week.

Enjoy the games, everybody.

Yep, it’s fairly straightforward. As a bonus, when I copy & paste that post (as it displays) into Word – preserving all formatting – it prints out properly on a single sheet of paper in landscape format, complete with room allowed for penciling in results as I watch the games. (The dots don’t show up; the off-white background is simulated, but it isn’t too bad.)

For creating it, I simply copy the reply with quote text (with codes) into notepad, where it is a simple matter to line up the columns, as notepad doesn’t word wrap.

I do have a minor change to my action. There is a “poor man’s lottery” strategy for doing parlays. The idea is to win 3 parlays in a row: 1 early, 1 late, 1 night. You put whatever you’ve won previously on the next. So 55 for 120, then 110 for 240, then 330 for 720. You only risk that first 55, but if you go 6 for 6 you pocket 1080. If you’ll notice, you can lose 55 nineteen times for 1080, which means you only have to hit once per season to break even. We only did this maybe 4 weeks total, at random times, when the week happened to set up such that we had parlays we already liked early, late, and at night. This is one such week, so the next post will have my updated strategy.

Forgive my repost of the picks; as I said above I print them out.

1:00pm…RAMS…6½…Titans…45½Rams should be able to handle the Titans.
1:00pm…**EAGLES…7½…Raiders…47…**The Raiders should cover.
1:00pm…**Bengals…3…BEARS…40…**Good game. Too good to put any action on.
1:00pm…**JETS…2½…Jags…34…**Jets too inconsistent. Bet the under.
1:00pm…VIKINGS…3½…Saints…44½Saints rebound with the win. Bet the under.
1:00pm…Panthers…3…DOLPHINS…36½Strange spread. Panthers are a mortal lock.
1:00pm…**COLTS…13½…Browns…47…**Way too many points. Run away!
1:00pm…BILLS…3…Falcons…36½Billies and the over.
1:00pm…Bucs…3½…PACKERS…37½Bucs in a landslide.

4:05pm…SEAHAWKS…6…Cards…41½Cards and the over. Way over.
4:05pm…**Cowboys…6½…49ERS…41…**Cowboys and the under.
4:15pm…**STEELERS…3…Patriots…42…**Pats bounce back, and the over looks good.

8:30pm…**CHARGERS…5½…Giants…42…**Giants and the over, both easily.
9:00pm…**BRONCOS…3…Chiefs…48…**Have to take action on MNF, so take the under.

Early Games
Risk 55 for 120 on the Panthers & Bucs

Late Games
If up 120, risk 110 for 240 on the Pats & the Over, or else
Risk 30 for 60 on the Pats & the Over

Sunday Night
If up 360, risk 330 for 720 on the Giants & the Over, or else
If down 85, risk 55 for 120 on the Giants & the Over, or else
Risk 55 for 50 on the Giants

Monday Night
If down 140, risk 55 for 120 on the Chiefs & the under, or else
Risk 30 for 25 on the Under

Standing
Last week: no action
Season: 6-11, -35

Note: The above progression only works if the previous game is already clinched with time to spare. You can’t book after about 10-15 minutes before kickoff…so if the Panthers game goes to overtime, for example, and then win by a TD to cover, it will not have been possible to have done the progression.

Also, in the above caveat, let’s say the Panthers win in overtime by 3, which is a push. That would turn the Panthers & Bucs parlay into a straight bet on the Bucs. Of note is the fact that there is no such thing as a push on an over/under. (If the Giants & Chargers combine for exactly 42, both overs and unders lose, as 42 is neither over nor under 42.)

Flame on baby

The Skins are 5-2 over thier last 7 games, losing by 3 each to Dallas and Philly.
Moss is tied (with TO) for 2nd most rec yards in the NFL
Portis is no.3 in the NFC

The D is top 3 NFL

Don’t buy the hype – all the football Intellegensia have the skins winning 4 games or are badmouthing Gibbs – while having Philly in the SB and Dallas as a wildcard-- it is group think and ultimately, Insane,

Flame off
(I’m such a homer but all the above – except the opinion stuff - is true)
I like the Bucs/Pack analysis. I think Sunday will tell if the Pack have a stake thru thier heart or not

That is a neat posting trick

Lets throw the pick 5 out there for the record.

Carolina, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay, Indy, Dallas

Told you not to take the Over in that one. And, FTR, the referees calling that game were complete morons.

Well, for the 9 early afternoon games, I’m 6-3.

Heh :slight_smile:

Dildo :wink:

I went 2-7 in the early games, 3-3 in the afternoon games, and then 1-1 in the night game, for a combined record of 7-11 so far this week. But yet I’m only down 50, which is impressive for such a crappy record. Can’t wait to see all the red when I do the final tally tomorrow night. Ugh.

Can I just say again how happy I am that I don’t bet on sports anymore? Nobody picks worse than me except the guy I used to bet with; we’d agree on the picks and then split the cost and winnings. It was a never-ending trainwreck.