If you had the option of having sex with a woman with a totally hot body and amazing face who basically just lay there, or a really unattractive woman who was either really overweight or way too thin or otherwise had an unattractive body (but not so overweight that it inhibited movement) who was an total amazing tiger in bed, which would you pick? Note that the hot and ugly women are not conventionally hot or ugly, they’re at the far ends of the bell curve (like, hottest possible woman vs. ugliest possible woman).
What about to date, if they were equally compatible otherwise?
Oh, and I don’t know if this is even an issue, but sex is possible with the unattractive one because you can get aroused knowing how good she is in bed.
That’s a little hard to answer; I want to say, “As ugly as possible with sex still being conceivable.” But if that answer is unsatisfactory, let’s just say totally unattractive features, no disfigurements of any kind.
Hot and lousy. Hot is still hot. That’s good enough. Skills can’t make up for ugly. If it’s Jessica Alba, she can lie there like a statue and I’ll still be just fine. Janet Reno could be a superhuman sexual athlete and Little Richard still isn’t going to be interested.
This is… um… this is a very difficult question, and I suspect some kind of Catch-22ish double bind type thingy.
I mean, the terms are incompatible: Physically disgusting but good in bed? I’m having trouble even imagining it. I would say I’d go with the good in bed one, except- I can’t see it happening.
You make the other one sound like a warm RealDoll, which is just creepy. I can’t imagine anyone like that being compatible with me.
I could use lateral thinking and say you can teach the dull one or get the ugly one in shape, but then I’d be defeating the purpose of your trick question, wouldn’t I? I’m sure I’m supposed to reveal my inner hypocrisy or something, somehow.
My mind’s eye would still be working. That and touching her body would still not be fun.
I dunno about this question in general though. What does “as ugly as you could conceive having sex with” mean? If she’s that ugly I don’t think I could get it up. So I guess get me a smoking hot woman, I’ll have sex with her, and then bring me decreasingly hot women with increasing skill, and when I’m done I’ll have an answer.
No matter how hot the chick is, you’ll lose interest after a while. Bill Maher is right: no matter how hot a woman is, somewhere, someone is tired of fucking her. Don’t be that guy! You’ll start to resent her for being shitty in the sack, too. Worse, you may start to question your own bedroom skills and feel your self esteem plummet.
Ugly tiger’s the only way to go. Awesome sex never, ever gets old. Whaddya mean, you won’t be able to get it up? She’ll get you up, don’t worry…
I didn’t think we were talking about a relationship, just a one time bounce on the bedsprings.
Having said that, I’d still rather have a relationship with a hot stiff than an ugly tiger. At least the hottie looks good on your arm and I just do not think that aggressiveness makes ugly more alluring.
Toughie here. I would enjoy making love with, say, a hyper-aroused Susan Estrich, but would turn in disgust from an Andrea Dworkin (who, thankfully, would never have put me in such a position anyway).
On the beautiful-but-just-lies-there side, I could violate Alicia Witt’s passive form like a blow-up doll and put various tasty parts of her in my mouth, so all is not lost.
I love threads like this because they’re completely outside of any experience I could possibly have right now. I have to think back more than 35 years to when I actually had a choice of sexual partners, and I realize **Gatopescado ** is absolutely right. I boffed any adult human female willing to have me. There was no such thing as bad sex.
