I presume it’s to foster the notion that you didn’t see anything at all - not even enough to identify the person’s sex.
I always interpreted it to mean “I did not see your feminine charms - I thought you were a man”. Which is why you back out too - to indicate that you are not overtly embarrassed by seeing a naked lady.
Which begs the question: which is more insulting; having a man see your naughty bits or being mistaken for a man whilst naked?
For Victorians? Having a man see your naughty bits; definitely. This was a society where the ankle was considered a risqué erogenous zone.
Got milk?
Nice suit. Did you get it for your birthday?
My goodness, am I overdressed?
Am I early for the Tupperware party?
Groucho Marx, A Night At the Opera
Honey, did you send in the car payment?
My wife. The only woman I’ve seen naked for a loooong time.
You know, I have this Really great way to keep your feet warm…wanna see?
In modern times it is appropriate to shout out “CANNONBALL!” as a warning.
Like this?
Note: no naughty bits in view, but if you work with prudes, you might want to wait till you get home to view this.
I just got this spam, and it’s a lot more boring than this thread. It just says:
So don’t feel bad, NurseCarmen, you didn’t miss much.
Are they real?
And they’re spectacular!
Sorry, I have the hiccups of doom and they’ve kind of crippled my brain.
OK, Ms. Smith, you’re cleared for boarding. (God, I love this job…)
Mrs. Robinson, are you trying to seduce me?
What can I do to ensure your continued nakedness?
Did you remember to pay the electricity bill?
Can I borrow your towel, my car just hit uuhhhhh … water buffalo.
So, how much do I owe you?