A thread that doesn’t get many replies should be called an Anchor because it sinks to the bottom fast and a thread that gets many replies should be called a Dead Body because it keeps coming up to the top.
If it’s not clever as I think let me know.
Now let me see will this thread be an Anchor or a Dead Body?
The ideal “anchor” would be a thread that gets bumped up a couple of times, but just keeps dropping down again, and eventually gets lost in the muck at the very bottom (ie, the second page).
anchor sounds good…like anchor-man. Something thats always there.
and dead body just doesn’t sound like something I’d like to call mine.
Whatever though…just call me threadkiller just the same.
Anchor seems to connote something good. Anchorman. He/She’s my anchor. A thread that gets no replies implies something unworthy about it (though there may in fact be nothing wrong with it). And dead body? Seems contradictory. The floating part works, but it floats because there’s activity. That’s not very “dead”-seeming to me.
Heh. I hereby nominate “Hindenburg” to describe a thread that was intended to be a serious, factual discussion, but ended up getting tossed into Great Debates or The Pit, or just locked.
Well, I don’t want to hijack, but I respectfully disagree.
Anyhoo, if there’s consensus that a thread turns into a Hindenburg when it lands in either The Pit or GD, then that’s really all that matters, as far as expanding the lexicon goes. I very much like the concept, at any rate, however widely it is applied.