I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m just laughing. 
the flock follows the leading horse…even from over a cliff.
bj0rn - …
[Crow T. Robot voice]
What?
[/Crow T. Robot voice]
Flocks don’t follow horses.
Nor do horses come in flocks.
Fenris
Flock you, Fenris, and the horse you came in on.
But Baby Jesus did not have a flock until he was much older.
I thought a bunch of lambs and sheep were near the manger with him. Or is that another flocking rural legend*
Fenris
*Like an urban legend, only with rather more livestock.
Sounds like arctic melbas, known to run en masse over cliffs, leading to the expression “Melba? Toast.”
Oh for the days when a Chinatown reference would kill a pointless thread.
bj0rn, I hate to say it pal, but you’re becoming boring and predictable. These pointless nonsensical posts just don’t cut it, man. Back in the day, you’d toss in some majorly fucked up shit about sarcasm and communication as well. That was entertainment. This is just repetition.
i do not feel ashamed to say it, but i accually did this on purpose.
not to get any kicks out of it or general trolling or whatyoumightcallit.
horses come in herds, i know! but you are obviously to narrow minded to look past possible language differences.
in the OP of this thread i said i dont mind if people do not want to read what i have to say. but i do mind if you reply to what i have to say without bothering to read it.
icelandic infants are sometimes called: “oooh hann/hún er svo mikið rassgat”.
which translates directly to: “oooh he/she is such an asshole”
originally the saying “að gera úlfalda úr mýflugu” (make a camel out of a moskito) came to iceland from denmark. originally it was “gor en myg til en elefant” (or something like that, my danish skills are even worse than my english skills) but has been converted from an elefant to a camel. why? because originally camel and elefant meant the same in icelandic.
its a flock of birds and a herd of cows…how much does it matter if someone messes it up and says “a herd of birds and a flock of cows”?
hell, it even sounds better!
uh, hi coldie…how nice of you to comment.
i see you are still your old self, how comforting.
ill tell you what is nonsensical: steriotypical behavior.
it is true that without it the human being is pretty handicapped (without it we lose the ability to categorize). but we must also realize what a dangerous tool it can be…
we need the ability to make steriotypes, yet we would propably do better without it…
you think this is repetition? i say you are absolutelly true.
tell me something else, do you belive that my OP is repetition of what i “fought” for earlier or are the posts following my OP the repetition.
then tell me if the path chosen for this thread is MY repetition or the contributors repetition.
bj0rn - …
AH-HA!
Here he is: the bj0rn of days of old, the hostile fuck who immediately explodes into insult (“narrow minded”, “asshole”) when anyone says anything he can’t quite manage to understand. So much for second chances. :rolleyes:
Fenris
[Still trying to fathom why it’s still here, since this is obvious trolling.]
My guess? He was being given the benefit of the doubt. Which he’s now blown, IMO.
hmm…how can you call examples of language differences insults?
and i called you narrow minded for not being able to look past language differences…for me, thats an observation rather than an insult (at least in this case).
bj0rn - im not asking you to give anyone a chance, im asking you to give yourself a chance.
err…how can you say that my OP is “trolling”?
whatever the replies to my OP have come to can not be considered trolling unless you want to include everyone who have contributed in that act aswell…that includes you too.
bj0rn - …
Because it’s kind of obvious to a dullard like me that you’re only posting to get a reaction from people.
Maybe my definition of the term differs from others, though. Sure seems like one hell of a benefit of the doubt.
from the OP:
this is, has been and will always be the case.
monolog, dialog, pluralog…whatever, people have always expressed their feelings according to the standards of the culture in which they live in (with logical exceptions of course). saying that:
is hypocrisy in itself. unless you care to explain what kind of reaction you are talking about.
bj0rn - …
Bah. You know perfectly well that the main reason that many people have even entered this thread was because of your thread title. If you were ranting all this time about this particular Pit rule, that’d be one thing. But I wager you only put it in your title so you could get people to listen to your ramblings.
Besides, it’s obvious to me you’re just egging people on, trying to provoke them. Others may have gotten your “point” by now, but it just seems like you’re trying to start shit.
frankly i have no idea why you do not believe me…and to tell you the truth, i dont care.
the fact that people want to reply with posts like:
and:
[quote]
Has anyone noticed that no one ever sees Bj0rn and Henry B in the same room at the same time?
[quote]
and:
and many other posts in this thread alone.
do you ever question your own assumptions?
bj0rn - …