I don’t know where else to post this thread–it isn’t really a Great Debate, nor is it a General Question. MPSIMS is crashing with depressing regularity. So here it is, in the Pit.
Okay, folks, I want to try an experiment. I have a theory that Bjorn could converse normally if everybody wasn’t raggin’ on him about spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc., and shouting at him about his weird postscripts. Yes, I’ve read some of the threads in the Archives, but sometimes you just have to find a thing out for yourself, you know?
So, I’m posting this “Conversation with Bjorn” thread to test this theory. If it turns out to be totally awful, I will ask Lynn to close it (although I admit there’s a distinct possibility that she’ll leave it open “to teach me a lesson”. If so, I will wear my battle scars with dignity and pride.
Besides, the “sarcasm and irony” thread is taking too long to load and is getting confusing and weird, and I think Green Bean’s “letter” has made its point. IMHO, of course.
Here are the ground rules for “A Conversation with Bjorn”:
[ul][li]Spelling doesn’t count.[/li][li]Neither does punctuation.[/li][li]Neither does capitalization.[/li][li]Neither does grammar.[/ul][/li]I have said it before, and I’ll say it again–I don’t care how a person says something, as long as it’s interesting. If your typewritten copy looks like something from the Special Ed class, I don’t care, as long as you’ve got something to say.
And for those inevitable few among you who will find it amusing to kick sand in the face of this ground rule by intentionally posting with idiotically scrambled punctuation and capitalization (“tee-hee!”), I will only say that I shall recline at my ease up here on my mountaintop, watching with interest and amusement the antics of the tiny creatures below.
[ul][li]No pointless Bjorn-bashing. However, I do realize that this is the Pit, so of course you may bash if it seems truly necessary, say for purposes of mental health.[/li][li]Bjorn shall have the freedom, as shall everyone else participating in this conversation, to put as many strange and gnomic utterances into his postscripts as he pleases, and the rest of us shall try to grin and bear it.[/li][li]However, WE shall have the freedom to use as much sarcasm and irony as we feel necessary to the flow of conversation. If Bjorn declines to participate in this conversation for that reason, then I guess this thread will simply sink to the bottom of the list and eventually disappear.[/ul][/li]I asked Bjorn yesterday in another thread, “What do you want?” This was his reply:
**
This sounds reasonable to me. He wants the acknowledgement that “Everyone is entitled to his opinion, unless the person with an opinion doesn’t acknowledge that another person with an opinion has a right to that opinion.” Gee, I can’t hardly disagree with that. Isn’t that what the SDMB is all about?
Okay? Let’s begin.
Bjorn, here’s your assignment. Go to the front door of wherever you live, look around outside for a few minutes, and try to think of either something you see out there that you’d like to change, or something that you see out there that you hope NEVER changes. OK? And please try to think of a topic more substantial than, say, “My neighbor’s mailbox is really ugly, I wish he’d paint it,” or, “I hope Joe’s Pizza never goes out of business.”
Be prepared to discuss why you feel this way, about whatever it is.
We eagerly await your reply.
And no, I am not making fun of you.
“Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast!” - the White Queen