does that include posts like:
“check your spelling” and “shut up”?
i guess rule number 3 doesnt mean people have to read what i have to say…but one can always hope
anyway…there is something i want to say, if no one is prepared to read it, so be it…but this has got to come out.
here in iceland couple of people are producing a movie about teasing. this group of people (the producers of the film) sought support from various companies, among them were coca-cola iceland and búnaðarbankinn(the acriculture bank, but were denied of support. the búnaðarbankinn even replied with a message. “supporting a campaign versus teasing does not match our policy (something like that)”.
recently a “famous” icelandic actor began a solo fight against teasing…his mission was to build a house where the victims of teasing could get help. his campaign was welcomed and various parties offered their support, including coca-cola iceland and búnaðarbankinn.
Has anyone noticed that no one ever sees Bj0rn and Henry B in the same room at the same time?
Coincidence?
Or not.
< cue dramatic, sinister organ music >
Anyway, isn’t this like your third thread like this? You suddenly reappear after being gone awhile, much like a case of athlete’s foot, complain that you’re being ignored (Your last one was, IIRC titled something like “Look at me, I’m invisible”) then vanish again, leaving us in merciful, blessed silence.
Hmm. The first bit is an irrelevant digression about Pit rules, but after that, it seems to make some kind of sense… at least, I can vaguely see the point.
So… either bj0rn’s improving, or I shouldn’t have had that second bottle of whisky for breakfast.
i do expect people to read the messege they are replying to…
yes, the topic suggest that this is a “pit rule” discussion…but it isnt…sorry for being vague on the subject.
which is why i said a few words about “people reading what i have to say” at the top of the OP…just in case you didnt want to read what i had to say and wouldnt reply…
but i guess that didnt work, now did it?
all i can say is: i am sorry you didnt read what i had to say.
**
Ok. Apparently the mystery of your bizarre reappearance threads and the mysterious ‘I’m being ignored’ first part is contained in a hidden clue in the second part of the cryptic message. Leave us examine it.
Right. There’s a movie about teasing and some companies didn’t want to support the movie. Sadly you neglect to tell us if the movie was for or against teasing. If it was in favor of schoolchildren being taunted 'till they cried, I see why Coca-Cola wouldn’t support it. But even if it WAS against teasing, why should a corporation support some guys who say “Dððd! Let’s make a mðvie!” They’re certainly not obligated to do so. And for all the information you provided, the “people” who are making the teasing movie are just a bunch of drunken frat-boys.
**
**
Ok, so some “famous” Icelandic actor (insert obvious “Contradiction in terms” joke here ) wanted to build a halfway house so that vicitims of teasing could recover. He apparently had a specific goal in mind and he wasn’t (since he’s “famous”) some nobody who said “Let’s put ðn a shðw, dððd!” Thus, he got support from those selfsame groups who ignored the nobodies.
Makes sense. But you seem to be upset about it. And then you digress into gibberish.
**
…no…I’ve never wished my name was mr.john. And even if I did, what would that have to do with any of the above? Unless mr.john is the name of the “famous” actor. In which case this next sentence:
**
**
…is just bizarre. You’re against a halfway house for victims of teasing? Are you also against battered women’s shelters? Burn recovery units? What kind of a depraved monster ARE you?
In any event, what I find totally lacking is any clue in all this teasing discussion to anything connected to the first part of your thread. What does teasing have to do with you being ignored? They seem to be rather the opposite, really.
uhmm…yes. i apologize…i made an assumption when i shouldnt have.
the movie was against teasing.
other details i neglected to mention…thank you for asking.
this “famous” icelandic actor and other “famous” icelandic figures as well as regular joes, all victims of teasing, were interviewed in this documentary (yes, i should have said that in the beginning).
so, even though the produces of the documentary were “nobodies” their work was VERY good.
there are more details and wierd circumstances in this case, but i tried to explain the general picture in the OP.
being a famous spokesman does not guarantee the validity of your speech.
anyway, thanks for you questions and comments fenris…much valued.
