A Glossary of Black on White Crime:

A Glossary of Black on White Crime:
Racially Motivated Crimes Committed by Blacks
Compiled by James P. Lubinskas

                               Home

Everyone has heard of the 1998 dragging death of James Byrd in Jasper, Texas. The following crimes,
committed by blacks, are considerably less well known.

Caffey, Fedell; Ward, Levern; and Williams, Jacqueline
–Three blacks from the Chicago suburb of Schaumburg killed a white woman, Debra Evans, who was
pregnant with a mulatto child, because Miss Williams wanted a “light-skinned” baby. They cut open
Miss Evans and took the baby, who lived. They then killed two of Miss Evans’ other children,
Samantha, 10 and Joshua, 7, who were white. (Dan Rozek, “DuPage Jury Told of Murder Plot,”
Chicago Sun-Times, March 12, 1998, p.8.)
Esau, Eli Clean – He was one of five black men charged with raping a white teenager in a Pulaski
County (Arkansas) Jail. The five blindfolded the victim and forced him to perform oral sex on them. At
least one of them raped him anally. A prosecutor noted that the blacks were “bragging that they were
pimping this white guy.” (Elizabeth Caldwell, “LR Teen Pleads Guilty to Jail Rape,” Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette, August 19, 1993.)
Evans, Edward –This black man shot and killed an aide to U.S. Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) in
1992 on the streets of Washington DC. One of Mr. Evan’s friends said he “bore a grudge” against
white people and had vowed to kill one. Despite overwhelming evidence a lone black juror refused to
vote for conviction, resulting in a hung jury. (“Race-Conscious Juries Free Killers,” Middle American
News, February 1996.)

Fareed, Maurice –On May 24, 1996, Maurice Fareed, 24, killed a white delivery man and a white
policeman in Dayton, Ohio because of his anger at whites. According to his mother, “. . . the last
couple of days he said there wasn’t no hope and that white people were going to keep black people in
slavery.” Police killed Mr. Fareed in a shoot-out. (Reuters, May 24, 1996)

Ferguson, Colin – This 35-year-old immigrant from Jamaica shot and killed six people–all white or
Asian–on a Long island commuter train in December, 1993. Mr. Ferguson left notes blaming whites
and Asians for his problems. (James Barron, “Portrait of Suspect Emerges in Shooting on L.I. Train,”
New York Times, December 9, 1993, p. A1.)

Gang of Blacks–A dozen black teenagers went looking for a fight with whites in the Tampa area in
May 1990. They found a fight and were trounced by the whites. They later returned with
reinforcements and found a few of their opponents in a parking lot. They beat the unarmed whites with
clubs. Most escaped but the blacks cornered one white and beat him to death with a two-by-four. A
witness told police the blacks were yelling with each blow: “Don’t ever fuck with us again!” (Rex
Henderson, “Beating Death of White Raises Racial Tension,” Tampa Tribune, May 20, 1990, p. B1.)

Gilmore, Danny–A 23-year-old white man got lost driving in a black neighborhood in Cleveland. He
got into a minor traffic accident and a gang of blacks attacked him while he was waiting for the police.
One beat him with a beer bottle and he collapsed in the street. A black got into Mr. Gilmore’s truck
and repeatedly ran it over his body. Mr. Gilmore was with two friends who were black, who both
escaped unharmed. According to a Cleveland homicide detective, “The mayor’s office does not want
us to have racial killings in this town, so Danny Gilmore’s death wasn’t a racial crime. And I’m the
tooth fairy.” (Ted Joy, “Danny Gilmore, RIP,” The Quill, May 1989, pp. 21-27.)

Harris, Joseph – A black postal worker in New Jersey who had been fired, shot and killed three
whites and slashed another to get revenge against the “white-dominated postal hierarchy.” He was
convicted of murder. (Thomas Zambito, “Guilty: Former Postal Worker Was Sane When He Murdered
Four, Jury Finds,” The Record (Bergen, New Jersey), December 8, 1995, p. A1.)

Herbert, Robert –In January, 1991, Robert Herbert and three other black men made a pact to kill the
first white person they saw walking down their street in Boston. Mark Belmore, a white student at
Northeastern University was the unlucky man. The three blacks stabbed him to death. (Mike
Barnacle, “A Double Standard For Race Crimes?”

Knapp, Troy – A dozen black high school students beat this 35-year-old white man into a coma in
late 1999. The blacks were on their way home from a high school dance at North Charleston (SC)
High School when one was heard saying, “Yeah, we’re going to get us a white boy.” Police arrested
seven people and charged them with second-degree lynching. (Herb Frazier, “Police Charge Seven
Suspects in North Charleston Beating,” Post and Courier (Charleston), October 19, 1999.)

McCray, Terrence, and Lawrence, Ledell – These two black men decided to attack the next white
they saw walking down their street in Jacksonville, Florida. Gregory Griffith, a retarded man, was the
hapless victim. The two beat and stomped him unconscious; he died ten days later. (“Police: Murder
of Handicapped White Man Racially Motivated,” Tampa Tribune, September 4, 1999.)
Asbury Park Press, March 7, 1991, p. A21.)

McCree, Clifford –A 41-year-old black man who had just lost his job, shot and killed five whites and
himself in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. A suicide note blamed whites for “economic lynching” and said, “I
also wanted to punish some of the cowardly, racist devils . . . .” Mr. McCree had been fired because
he kept failing drug tests and threatening co-workers. (Paul Carson, “Florida Gunman Wanted to
Punish ‘Racist Devils’,” Reuters, February 10, 1996.)

McLauchlin, Melissa –A group of Charleston, South Carolina blacks abducted, gang-raped, tortured,
and shot 25-year-old Miss McLauchlin and left her to die. They said they wanted to “get a white girl” in
revenge for “four hundred years of oppression.” Miss McLauchlin was found still alive along a rural
highway but died from her wounds. (G.J. Krupey, “Black Hate Crimes,” Heterodoxy, February 1996,
p.1.)

Riddick, Gregory –Blacks in Kenosha, Wisconsin who had just seen the 1989 film Mississippi
Burning about KKK atrocities attacked and beat 14-year-old Gregory Riddick. The group’s leaders,
Todd Mitchell, told police they were “hyped up” after the film and wanted to “get some white people.”
Mr. Mitchell received a four-year jail sentence. Mr. Riddick was left with permanent brain damage.
(G.J. Krupey, “Black Hate Crimes,” Heterodoxy, February 1996, p.1.)

Rosenbaum, Yankel – About 20 blacks surrounded a Rabbinical student and stabbed him to death
as they chanted “Kill the Jew.” The murder took place during the Crown Heights, New York, Riots of
1991. Blacks attacked and beat many other whites, including journalist Jimmy Breslin. (Jimmy
Breslin, “It’s Not Simply Blacks vs. Jews,” Newsday (New York) September 3, 1991, p. 2.)

Twenty-five-year old white woman–A black man held a gun on a white New York City television
producer and raped, beat, and sodomized her. During the attack the man shouted racial curses at
her. Police did not classify the attack as a bias crime. (Murray Weiss, Don Kaplan, Paula Doneman,
and Cathy Burke, “Cops Fume Over Lousy Video Of 6th Street Ave. Rapist,” New York Post,
December 22, 1999.)

Wagner, Jerry – This 21-year-old black was charged for stabbing five whites in Chicago. He used a
steak knife and an ice pick to attack five whites at random. He said he heard a voice that told him to
kill white people and he yelled racial profanities as he stabbed his victims. (Phillip O’Connor, “Man is
Charged in 5 Stabbing; Cops Say Incidents ‘Hate-Related’,” Chicago Sun-Times, March 17, 1997, p.
16.)

Westerman, Michael –On January 14

And your point is? Is it that you are white and feel you are being trampled upon by the “black” people?

I’m white and I don’t feel like I’m gradually losing my rights because of it. In the cases you quote it doesn’t appear that anyone got off scot free. Unless you count the time a black juror refused to convict. Isn’t it possible that he wouldn’t convict because that person didn’t feel there was enough evidence? Just because someone is arrested for a crime doesn’t mean they are neccessarily guilty. There is such a thing as innocent until proven guilty.

Make a point.

You don’t mean “glossary”, either.

[Moderator Hat: ON]

Is there a debate here, or just a rant?


David B, SDMB Great Debates Moderator

[Moderator Hat: OFF]

Pardon my suspicious nature.

But I notice that you’ve just registered yesterday, Captain Ed.

So can I ask you this question: if I agreed with your sentiments, would a I deserve a BZ from you?

  • Rick

Well, we could debate which flaw from the implication made by the OP matters most.

Is it:

  1. The false dilemma, where either blacks are more criminal than whites or vice-versa?

  2. Argument from ignorance, where something not proven true is assumed to be false?

  3. Slippery slope fallacy, where increasingly unnacceptable consequences are drawn?

  4. Complex question, where two unrelated points are conjoined into a single premise?

  5. Appeal to pity, where the reader is asked to sympathize with one side or the other?

  6. Appeal to consequences, where the author points to disagreeable consequences of disregarding his view?

  7. Prejudicial language fallacy, where value or moral goodness is attached to believing the author?

  8. Popularity argment, where the author validates his opinion because it is held by a large number of people?

  9. Attacking the person, where the author misdirects the argument to an attack on individuals?

  10. Appeal to authority, where the reader is expected to take the word of some news source or authority?

  11. Hasty generalization, where the conclusion is drawn from too small a sample?

  12. Unrepresentative sample, where the sample does not faithfully represent the whole?

  13. False analogy, where the author is comparing two or more events that are essentially unrelated?

  14. Slothful induction, where the actual truth of a conclusion is denied despite evidence to the contrary?

  15. Fallacy of exclusion, where evidence that would change the outcome of the argument is excluded or ignored?

  16. Accident fallacy, where a generalization is applied when circumstances warrant an exception?

  17. Post hoc fallacy, where a thing that follows something else is held to cause what it follows?

  18. Joint effect fallacy, where one thing is held to cause another, when in fact they are co-causes of something else?

  19. Fallacy of insignificance, where one thing is held to be the cause of another, and it is, but is insignificant compared to some other cause?

  20. Begging the question, where the truth of the conclusion is assumed by the premise?

  21. Irrelevant conclusion, where argument in defnese of one conclusion instead proves another conclusion?

  22. Straw man, where the arguer attacks something that is different from his opponents point?

  23. Fallacy of composition, where because the attributes of the parts of a whole have a certain property, it is argued that the whole has that property?

  24. Undistributed middle, where two separate categories are said to be connected because they share a common property?

  25. Illicite major, where the predicate of the conclusion talks about all of something, but the premises only mention some cases of the term in the predicate?

  26. Nonsupport fallacy, where evidence for the phenomenon being explained is biased, or was derived by bias?

  27. Limited depth fallacy, where the theory which explains does not appeal to underlying causes?

What’s your vote?


“It is lucky for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler

Rick - I dunno - What’s a “BZ”?


Discriminating people discriminate

We could debate the implication in the OP if it contained any clear implication at all or if the poster were prepared to say what he intended to imply.

As it stands, it’s just a catalogue of events, from which we might be able to infer certain things about the character and intellect of the poster, but nothing else.

There were thirty million violent crimes, in the US, during the last two decades. These have been twenty four of them.

<P ALIGN=“CENTER”>Tris</P>

“For every complex question, there is a simple answer-- and it’s wrong.”
–** H.L. Mencken **

Tom H. - Did you see any of these things in your local paper, or a national paper? I didn’t.

David B - Moderator - I’m not sure what this hat trick is. Could you please explain? If my posts here seem off the meaning of The Great Debate, is there another category where they would by more suitable? I personally think they are great subjects for debates.


Discriminating people discriminate

Well, he says this in the OP:

Making the point, I guess, that black on white crime goes unreported, which got me thinking about the irony in his long list of news stories that he submitted to support his theory.

Then I saw other implications with other flaws, and just started listing a few.


“It is lucky for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler

[Moderator Hat: ON]

Yes, they could be good subjects for debates, but not the way you framed them. As they stand, they are rants and belong in the Pit. So that’s where it’s going.


David B, SDMB Great Debates Moderator

[Moderator Hat: OFF]

Captain Ed, you asked:

Your profile says you were a naval officer?

Huh.

Hi, Mikey.

  • Rick

Who is James Lubinskas? Does he have a web page about this topic? Does he think OJ Simpson is guilty?

“This whole discussion leaves me mortified and stupefied! It’s lewd, lacivious, salacious, outrageous. I am shocked and chagrined.” - Jackie Chiles, “Seinfeld”

No, I didn’t see any of these in the paper, but someone clearly did since they’re all reports from papers or news agencies.

And you really don’t mean “glossary”. A glossary is like a partial dictionary: it is a list of the meanings of obscure terms. You mean “list” or something like that.

Libertarian posts a seemingly exhaustive list of logical fallacies, and then asks:

[quote]
What’s your vote?{/quote]

My vote is that if these do not appear on a web page somewhere, they be generalized to remove any references to the OP, and left as a reference resource. Excellent summary of the fallacies!

  • Rick

“Making the point, I guess, that black on white crime goes unreported, which got me thinking about the irony in his long list of news stories that he submitted to support his theory.”

I think his point is that these crimes were under-reported, not completely unreported. Most of them didn’t make the national news the way the Texas dragging death did (except maybe the Long Island subway shooting).

Rick - I am a retired Naval Officer, Aviator, and I still don’t know what BZ means. Stop playing games and answer the simple question, OK?


Discriminating people discriminate

Gotta hand it to you Ed: no room for doubt with THAT sig line.


Coldfire: second to none but Satan.


“You know how complex women are”

  • Neil Peart, Rush (1993)

No, you’re not.

I am convinced that You’re The Artist Formerly Known As Mikey.

Futher, I am convinced you registered when you decided to abandon the Mikey persona for the Captain Ed one.

It was not easy trying to think of something that a Navy officer (especially an avaitor!) would know, and would be unlikely to appear in a search engine as you tried to discover the answer.

If you had chosen Air Force, I’d still be looking.

But BZ (Bravo Zulu) is well-known in the Navy as slang for “well done,” or “good job.”

Sorry. I work in the Pentagon. I have an excellent sample set of Naval officers, retired Naval officers (double dippers and contractors) from which to draw. I’ve asked nineteen of them this morning. Not one didn’t know the answer.

Mikey, this is not a witch-hunt.

It’s – as I tried to expain from my Star Trek analogy – just an inability to leave a puzzle alone.

Cheers,
Rick