In some of those little pocket-book anthologies of sexual encounters, it is said that, when a woman is lying on her back for sex, she can allow the man to penetrate farther into her if she raises her knees so her legs are bent all the way and the soles of her feet are down on the mattress, or whatever. Is there any truth to this or did the creative (?) writers of these anthologies make it up? 
It’s all about the woman arching her pelvis. The position described sounds like it would do just that, IMO.
In my experience the deepest penetration is achieved by the girl laying on her back and having her knees pulled back near her chest or on my shoulders. Its a combination of her having her hips tilted to allow full penetration and her legs being lifted out of the way so my hips come flush against her vulva.
That enough information from me for this discussion I hope.
Oh, Id stay put a pillow under her butt…that’ll give some more depth. Frankly, though, what’s the point of all this anyway?
The point, and it’s a good one, is deeper penetration.
Those positions effectively shorten the vagina, kinda like scrunching a sock to put it on. However a big guy can have too little room if you use those positions. With an average sized guy they feel great.
(not that depth of penetration is the be-all & end-all of intercourse; but - when it’s the objective of the moment…)
A manual I read years ago listed the following position for deepest penetration: the woman lies on her SIDE with the knee of her top leg brought toward her chest. The man straddles the straight lower leg and enters her with his body perpendicular to hers (one could imagine that this position was suggested by the woman after experiencing it in a lesbian encounter, to give credit where credit is due). An analogy would be to fit your two hands together at the spaces between each set of ring & middle fingers - the fit is naturally closer when they’re at differeing angles of approach. (also - manual stimulation where the woman is pleased to receive same is easier in this position than in the missionary position)
Another deep-penetration position is a variation of the woman-on-top where instead of her knees she squats on her feet and takes the man as deeply as possible into herself.
Both these positions are very intimate and as a result you and your partner can enjoy it as an expression of your emotional closeness - but listen guys: if she isn’t comfortable with it DO NOT force the issue. Women may have good reason to worry about their internal organs at a time when we guys can’t think about anything besides our one external organ.
(did I mention that I believe sex is an unspeakably shameful act and I can hardly contain my embarassment at having posted to this topic? Oh the things I endure in the fight against ignorance)
Slithy Tove, you have just described UncleBill’s most fav position to a T. Not only greater depth, but a … hmmm… to put it politely… a more snug fit, and great freedom of movement and thrust control for we males of the species.
Not to mention, for those in the mood, a nice transition position for the OTHER door.
[sub]Did I say that?[/sub]
i always thought the easiest way to get deeper was to have a big dick. KISS, you know.
To get deeper: you need a step-ladder! Place it behind her, climb up a step or two (until you’re lined up, so to speak), sling her tail over your shoulder to keep it out of the way, then pla… what??
[sup]Never mind![/sup]
Jesus, Handy, since when do you care if there’s a point?
Another penetrating possition is woman on her stomach and legs closed. At least I’ve been told that it gets very deep, and I haven’t heard any complaints so far!
“The point, and it’s a good one, is deeper penetration.”
Yeah, but you can only go so far & then you hit the cervix.
Well thats my experience anyway.