Yes!--Lie to the kids so they leave your alone!
And get sticky without the stamps…
I think this has been discussed already, in a teen pregnancy thread, if I recall.
IIRC, some nitwit came in the thread going on and on about how people should just not have intercourse if they don’t want to get pregnant. Who gives a fuck how responsible the partners are about birth control. If they don’t want to have baby after baby after baby, they should just never have intercourse. They don’t get to excersise a part of human instinct or experience that kind of intimacy with their life partners. Nope! If you don’t want to get preggers, no sex for you!
:rolleyes:
I believe said nitwit had their ass handed to 'em.
[sub]by the way, some people don’t want to be forced into a life of endless bj’s and cun. if they want to have intercourse as well. I believe the attitude of intercourse for procreation purposes only is confined to certain fundamentalist religious groups.[/sub]
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by lezlers *
**I think this has been discussed already, in a teen pregnancy thread, if I recall.
They don’t get to excersise a part of human instinct or experience that kind of intimacy with their life partners. Nope! If you don’t want to get preggers, no sex for you!
…kinda like “no soup for you!” shades of Seinfield.
[sub]by the way, some people don’t want to be forced into a life of endless bj’s and cun. i
O.k. all kidding aside. 
I’m a newbie so I’m not familiar with some thread on teen sex. I sincerely believe pleasuring your partner in other ways than intercourse is not such a bad thing-except for the squemish. Neither is intercourse:) Although it seems the thought of “endless bj’s etc.” is unappealing to you,
the thought of being forced into a life of endless diapers and nightlt colic is what would push me over the edge…
In addition to intercourse, sure. Instead of intercourse? As a life-long thing? You have to be fucking kidding me.
Of course, there’s nothing to force you into a life of endless diapers and colic. That’s what abortion and adoption are for.
Please pardon the unintentional pun in my previous post.
Gansagrl
I’m sorry, but your horrific coding made your post a bit difficult to understand.
What I got from it was that a life of no intercourse except for the purposes of having a child is better than a life with an unplanned for child.
Which basically boils down to an adult, married couple being expected to go 5, 10, 20+ years without engaging in sexual intercourse if they do not want children with possibly a brief reprise for as long as it takes to get pregnant if they do want children.
You can’t seriously be advocating this.
And before you go off on your whole “I’m not a prude, look, I’m advocating oral sex!” roll again, I’d like to reiterate that oral sex and sexual intercourse are two seperate things. Together they’re great, one without the other, EVER? Not so much.
Deadly Nightlight"s unfortunate sister’s story aside, birth control is very effective. If the thought of accidental pregnancy scares you that much, though, you can subsist on BJ’s and cunnilingus if you wish. Just don’t expect too many people to agree with this higly paranoid solution. And good luck finding a husband who thinks this is a good idea. I hear David Gest is now available.
O.K NOW Everybody take a deep breath and repeat after me:
:o Gansagrl is not telling you that you should never have intercourse again. Say it again-feel better? Go ahead:o
Gansagrl is not telling you that you should never have intercourse again. again This is not about you. We are talking about a woman who has been hijacked by her own fallopian tubes! A husband with sperm tails like the legs of a Lance Armstrong!:eek:
Let’s be proactive here. My vote is for a vasectomy with a hold
(take that breath again) on intercourse until the sperm count is back-usually a few months post-op.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by lezlers *
**Gansagrl
I’m sorry, but your horrific coding made your post a bit difficult to understand.
What I got from it was that a life of no intercourse except for the purposes of having a child is better than a life with an unplanned for child.
Which basically boils down to an adult, married couple being expected to go 5, 10, 20+ years without engaging in sexual intercourse if they do not want children with possibly a brief reprise for as long as it takes to get pregnant if they do want children.
You can’t seriously be advocating this.
You are right-I am not. I have just been made acutely aware of the limitations in clear communication when posting on message boards. Please also refer to my other post. 
Wow, quite a case of shooting the messenger here. Yes, sex is an important part of the human experience, but is it such a radical idea that sometimes there are things more important than it? Should Mrs. Christopher Reeves find a new guy?
And I still would it explained to me how it is that a life without intercourse is a terrible thing, if homosexuals routinely choose such a life.
Hey, if that’s what they choose, willingly and of their own free will, I say go for it. It’s not, however, what I would choose. Frankly, given the choice between gettting to have sex with my husband or never having sex with him because our birth control might fail, the sex thing wins hands down every time.
At our final Lamaze class the instructor was going over post-delivery issues and asked everyone to guess how long we have to wait before resuming intercourse. I said, after the vasectomy heals!
wow, lots of replies since I was here last
Someone on the first page (can’t remember who and too lazy/in a hurry to look it up) said it right
First Husband did not want a vasectomy- she got her tubes tied
They divorced
Second Husband didn’t think he needed one as her tubes were tied
She got pregnant again
Second Husband has Doctors appt to get a vasectomy
The Ryan, us homos hardly go without intercourse!
Highlight the box for a detailed analysis of Penetration for Queers:
Dildos, buttplugs, strap-ons, Greek, woooo!
Good point. Rather arrogant of us heteros to believe otherwise.
:rolleyes:
Thank you, Mister Nitpick. Since you people seem to refuse to take context into account when addressing my question, apparently I have to spell everything out. So I suppose I should have written “People in this thread are implying that anything short of a penis entering a vagina does not constitute a satisfying sex life. And yet most homosexuals do not perform that act. So is this act truly crucial to a satisfying life, or have you simply become convinced that this is so?” Is that explicit enough for you?
WOW I have never ever heard about this before! This is absolutely fascinating. Broomstick, do you have any cites or anything, I would love to learn more about this, it is so strange and unbelievable!
The Ryan, you’re hardly one to talk about context. What, with your comparing a hetero couple never having intercourse for fear of conceiving an unwanted child with a homosexual couple.
:rolleyes:
We’re talking about a couple refraining from doing something they are capable of and enjoy doing. With eachother.
Try and keep up.
Thank you, lezlers.
And The Ryan, it’s Missus Nitpick to you.
They do? Seriously? I’ve been looking like hell for a male contraceptive that doesn’t involve putting a rubber shield between myself and my beloved. Why have I never heard of these? Where can I read about them? What’s in them?