With a verb and a noun, I think.
Fucking Guiliani? If you want someone to masturbate about 9/11, he’s your guy. Anything else in all creation, he’s useless. Not to mention, he was a recipient of leaks of the DNC emails. Nothing like having a co-conspirator on your defense team.
Bwahahahahaha!
Well, he was at 9/11, you know.
I think we can start putting quotes around “legal team”.
Wait, 9/11? What was that? I mean, given that there were no terrorist attacks when Bush was President, and all.
"Mr. Cohen told The Wall Street Journal he hadn’t been to Prague since 2001, but on Twitter Tuesday night he said he had never been there.
He declined to answer further questions on Wednesday."
He also said during one of his appearances on the Sean Hannity (television) show that he had never been to Prague.
I’ve never been to Heaven, but I’ve been to Oklahoma. I can only hope Heaven’s nicer.
More like the Monty Python skit where a new detective walks in every 5 seconds, only to die…
Remember when Rudy was almost president but then he got ass cancer? I 'member.
So Rudy’s the Ted McGinley* of this sitcom? (The one titled… “That’s Our Trumpy!” or maybe “Orange Is The New Whacko”…)
*See, there’s this Ted McGinley Effect…
My goodness. They brought in Jules?
Just shows how desperate Trump is for legal representation right now. When is the last time Rudy’s been anywhere near a case this big as an attorney? This is just another example of Trump hiring a friend/celebrity to fill a role on his reality show. The only thing this orange clown respects more than unyielding loyalty is celebrity. Rudy brings both.
And from Rudy’s introductory ass-kissing of both Mueller and Trump, I suspect he’s not being brought on board for his robust legal mind. It’s to hopefully broker a deal that ends this investigation.
Trump, Bolton, Giuliani…the fourth one is Famine?
“NOTE: Rudy died on the way back to his home planet.”
Any cancer Giuliani gets is “ass cancer”.
But seriously: cancer is bad.
Loss of appetite, at least…
I doubt that the case has legs, but it’s interesting that the IG would do this, considering that McCabe had the authority to provide information to the press anyway at the time of the so-called “leaks”. The IG determined that McCabe released this information strictly for his own personal benefit and rejected McCabe’s assertion that this was done to give the FBI’s version of events unfolding at the time, which would seem like a very subjective conclusion to reach. Whether or not you truly believe McCabe did it to take some of the heat off himself in his role within the FBI at that time, it seems like there’s at least enough wiggle room to give him the benefit of the doubt. Instead, the IG seems determined to reject that out of hand, and equally determined to use his denials against him as a “lack of candor” or outright “perjury.” One has to seriously question the objectivity of the IG here.
But every last employee of the US Marshal Service can be terminated by the President of the United States. Don’t think this president wouldn’t make that absolutely clear if he wanted to. Don’t think any Republican member of Congress would stick their neck out to protest. Who they take their orders from doesn’t matter; it’s who signs their paycheck and processes their employment paperwork that determines whom they take their final orders from.
Many right wingers “seriously question the objectivity” of Bob Mueller (though that doesn’t seem popular on this MB).
It’s all the same game.
Seriously?
I think Earth is a planet; you think it’s a giant marshmallow. We have a rich diversity of ideas on the subject.
Ah, right. “Both sides do it,” eh?
FTR, I myself have seen no reason to question the objectivity of either Bob Mueller or Michael Horowitz (the DOJ IG). But I look comparably at people who question either.