I have observed a few members that give a rating system when it comes to rants. I have been properly instructed to give my rants with these characteristics in order to be “understood”:
-
a smidgen of mordant humour;
-
½ soupçon of brotherhood semblance with others about a particular topic that turns me (and hopefully, them) green;
-
a pinch of my rating on the jackasses that exist and my open/shut conclusions!
-
and don’t forget consistency!
We must stir this recipe to prevent burning–or in this case, let’s ask questions when we don’t understand the topic…
Okay… dinner’s ready!
-
I think the BBQ Pit is a wonderful place for me to vent my frustrations! Everyone seems so eager to inform me of my errors while not really paying attention to the topic that I view as ignorant;
-
I think the people behind those names use them as masks when they are more than likely ignored in the real world. I know I am;
-
I do not have an accurate view on the matter. My personality constantly tries to see the good in all people and situations, so I welcome some true elaboration;
-
There are truly good people here, so to you that feel it is necessary to clobber people with your creative witticisms and sarcasm could really put that juice to work in other areas. Little do you know that you are the stereotype you define in your rants.
Does it taste good? I hope it does. Have some sarcasm pie, jackass!
Questions are welcomed of me if you are unfamiliar with the jerks that don’t bother to take apart a position or aspect of a rant only to get upset when put in their respective places.