Ann Coulter on Herman Cain: "Our Blacks Are So Much Better Than Their Blacks"

That was my reaction: “Ann Coulter? Is that still a thing?”

Maybe Kimmy_Gibbler does, but I don’t. I just think she should get a Lifetime Pass from anybody paying the slightest bit of attention to her.

Well, he was, in the movie Alfie, but he was pretty sharp in The Cider House Rules.

Ooh! Ooh! I’m stealin’ that. Just letting you know.

/thread
But seriously, Anne Coulter is about as honest, relevant, and sane as Michael Moore, if he was on some sort of psychotic drug cocktail. The woman is a nut, and should not be conflated with most republicans in any case.

Or our basketball team for that matter

[QUOTE=BellRungBookShut-CandleSnuffed]
Or the basketball team, leading to headlines like this one:

Tall Black slapped with one-year ban for Kronic use
[/QUOTE]

…and of course we can’t forget the New Zealand Badminton team, who for a very short time were known as the Black Cocks. :smack:

C’mon you guys … we have so few. Can’t you let us be proud of the few that we have?

The Idiot With No Response speaketh.

As usual, you’ll just keep asserting that conservatives are racists while arguing for increased government programs to help those poor blacks (because they’ll never make anything of themselves without constant liberal hand-holding, dotcha know). Excuse me while I :rolleyes:.

Your :rolleyes: doesn’t mean jack shit unless you can come up with a cite that I have ever made any such assertion. Right now it looks like you’re standing ass-deep in donkey dung and lying about the scuff on someone else’s shoe.

But that isn’t what she said. She implied ownership of the blacks. That she’s too stupid to understand that’s what she did doesn’t change that.

Language matters, and if people are too niggardly with their words to avoid those tar babies in conversation, they’re going to find a lot of people uppity in every conversation they have.

I meant “you” in the general sense as “liberals,” not as “Czarcasm.” Apologies for not making that clear.

I see what Jew did there.

So either you were responding to someone else in this thread, and I’d still like a cite, or you were responding to no one at all in this thread and just doing an automatic “Must Defend Mistress Coulter!” lip flap.

Hey. He was just generalizing about how much liberals generalize. Give him a break.

Those are the only two options, huh? Geez, let me think about it.

A little late to be starting something like that so late in the game, don’tcha think?

Better late than Czarcasm (ie, never).

In addition to being a complete attention whore, our adorable little Ms. Coulter is also, let me remind everyone, a lawyer. As a rule, lawyers are trained to use words very precisely and very carefully.

An attention whore lawyer almost certainly chose those words with the explicit intent of generating this type of “outrage”. And it worked, at least to the extent that this thread is a reflection of the outrage.

Uh…wow. Really?
I’m feeling generous today, and will just assume that that last response was typed by a five year old who happened by your keyboard when you were in the bathroom.