[QUOTE=Sleeps With Butterflies]
…Could it have happened to anyone who had sex even if they used protection? Yes.
Seriously.dumb.comment.
[/QUOTE]
:rolleyes: Yes, it is a seriously dumb comment to note that a certain segment of the population is predisposed to have their first child in their mid teens. Money does not a midset change.
[QUOTE=DiosaBellissima]
Fine, fine, fine. Unless you’re gay though, you can find yourself in the same situation as Jamie Lynn and her boyfriend. Happy?
[/QUOTE]
So…we should teach kids to be gay, instead of how to use condoms or be abstinent? Brilliant!
[QUOTE=Sitnam]
:rolleyes: Yes, it is a seriously dumb comment to note that a certain segment of the population is predisposed to have their first child in their mid teens. Money does not a midset change.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, you’re totally right. I mean, I know I hate when those ghetto trash black people pop out kids all the damned time, too! I mean, they are WAY more likely to get knocked up than those dumb rednecks in Louisiana anyway! PDF Cite.
I’m kidding about the first part, of course, but the cite still stands. Unless of course I’m either a: totally misreading that table or b: it’s a bad cite (either of which are possible, I’m an idiot).
Oh, here’s another cite that breaks it down by state. Cite.
Unless you’re talking about another subset of the population, in which case I’d be interested in what you are talking about. It clearly isn’t socio economic status, so I wonder what it is if it isn’t race.
[QUOTE=WhyNot]
So…we should teach kids to be gay, instead of how to use condoms or be abstinent? Brilliant!
[/QUOTE]
Exactly. AND our world’s fabulocity will increase exponentially. We all win, damnit!
The mother’s parenting book is now canceled. Link. It was to be published by a Christian publisher - no comment on gullibility from me. The late night comments can’t catch a break can they. First the writer’s strike, and then the cancellation of something that would give them material for a week at least.
[QUOTE=Kokopilau]
I only remembered it because of that X-Play review. It was just about the most awful thing they’d seen, too.
[/QUOTE]
Oh, my, you’re right. Those cartoony graphics don’t even look like her. (What is it with licensed video games based on live-action sitcoms and making their stars into cartoon characters? The same thing happened with Hannah Montana. Both look like good fodder for bad reviews, like the funny stuff Seanbaby does for EGM.) Watch out for the Britnatee!
[QUOTE=Tuckerfan] Zoey 101 to be renamed "Who’s Your Daddy?"I’m no lawyer, but if this turns out to be true, then doesn’t this put them in a whooooole lotta legal troubles?
[/QUOTE]
:dubious: Yourself, given how much of this family’s life has been nothing but tabloid fodder, I see no reason to think that it’s automatically garbage. After all, tabloids covering the Spears family meltdown is no different that Nature running an article on evolution: It’s right in their skillset.
[QUOTE=Tuckerfan]
:dubious: Yourself, given how much of this family’s life has been nothing but tabloid fodder, I see no reason to think that it’s automatically garbage. After all, tabloids covering the Spears family meltdown is no different that Nature running an article on evolution: It’s right in their skillset.
[/QUOTE]
Easy, killer. Don’t get me wrong. I’d love for this to be true, but unless TMZ reports it, I can’t quite buy into it.
Disclaimer: I’ve been known to read Star Magazine. :o