No, I’m afraid not. There’s a difference between “joking about rape,” and “joking about something related to a rape.” The humor in this situation is found in Antoine Dobson’s mannerisms and habits of speech. That he happens to be talking about a rape is largely secondary to the source of humor, here. He could be talking about a mugging, or a car theft, and the humor would largely be unchanged. The rape is, as far as the joke goes, mostly immaterial, except insofar as the assault was the genitive event that led to him appearing on television.
George Carlin was joking about Porky Pig raping Elmer Fudd as far back as 1991, if not earlier, so I hardly think this is some new trend in society.
How so, precisely? Do you think joking about rape is going to lead to more rapes being committed? Or, perhaps, to fewer rapes being prosecuted, because people will think rape is just so hilarious now?
I don’t think either of those situations are very likely, myself. To the contrary, I can see this sort of thing being beneficial. It’s certainly a step up over the days when nobody talked about rape at all, ever, and being a rape victim was a source of shame. I would even go so far as to suggest that being able to laugh about something horrible demonstrates a healthy attitude towards that subject. Yes, of course, rape is terrible, but by treating it as this Very Serious topic that no one dare discuss but in hushed and somber terms, I think you’re attaching a huge psychic weight to the subject that makes it much more difficult for rape victims to come to terms with their assault.
Certainly, one needs to distinguish between rape jokes that are clearly harmful - ones that center around making fun of the victim, for example, or presenting the assault itself as wacky or mischevious hijinx, should be called out. But not making a distinction between the two is, I think, a serious mistake, regardless of which side you err on.
No, it does not. But we can examine the tenor of the jokes. The Kevin Costner Robin Hood movie that came out in 1991 (same year as Carlin’s joke) featured an attempted rape scene that was played for laughs. I don’t think that would fly in a movie made today. Comparing that scene, with Carlin’s joke from the same year, and with this recent internet meme, and you can see that there’s a pretty wide array of approaches to the topic, not all of them equally (or necessarily) offensive. How we as a society view sexual assault has evolved considerably over the last century, and our popular media reflects that. It wasn’t so long ago that the imagery of a boss chasing his secretary around the office was a standard comic device. This device is almost entirely gone, now, and while the concept of sexual assault is still fair game for humorists, the target of the humor has generally shifted away from the nudge-and-a-wink portrayals into bits that make the aggressive boss both a clear villain, and a deserving butt for the humor.
If we find a real rape victim who thinks this is funny, what does that do to your argument?