Because sometimes scapegoating the Kulaks for your problems get tiring.
So I find myself in a rut, where I feel there are a dozen or so aspects of my life that are not to my liking. I am sure tons of other people have gone through the same thing, and am curious as to their feedback on a variety of areas.
-
How do you identify what is actually causing the feeling of a rut, and how do you act on it so you do not spend all your time on less important things?
-
What about self acceptance vs changing your situation
-
What about the negatives of the new situation after you change it
So to expand: -
For this I was just considering making a list of everything which I think bothers me, look for common threads, then make a list of everything I can do to change it. Then research more ideas, and try to keep an updated list of everything I did each week to bring about those changes.
But how do you determine what ‘really’ is bothering you? It isn’t always apparent. A woman who is obsessed with her weight may really just be lonely and on some level assume losing weight will make her desirable (and by proxy less lonely). But losing weight won’t fix the real problem.
I guess introspective questioning and therapy are necessary to get to what a person really wants and needs so they do not end up pursuing less important or abstract goals.
How do you determine what you ‘really’ need to change vs. what you ‘think’ you need to change? After you do that, what methods do you use to enact that change?
- The hedonistic treadmill basically states people are constantly discontent on some level, and always thing fixing or buying XYZ will solve their problems and make them happy. But certain ideologies like Buddhism state the real solution is self acceptance. To be able to be aware of all your flaws, failings, humiliations, setbacks and still feel like a whole and complete individual anyway.
So part of me wonders how do you distinguish the two? When is it best to work on changing your situation vs when is it best to work on self acceptance? A problem like being in an abusive relationship, or being stuck in chronic poverty, or being addicted to something sounds like an issue that needs to be changed if you can change it. But what about changing careers or jobs?
My point is I am not sure if/when it is best to pursue change vs self acceptance to deal with feelings of discontentment. I wouldn’t recommend a person in an abusive relationship practice Buddhist self acceptance to make peace with the situation. But I wouldn’t recommend a person who is extremely neurotic about money or looks try to improve their financial situation and appearance and instead probably work on their underlying insecurities which drive that behavior.
- Even if you do change what you feel is bothering you, it usually just opens up a whole new set of responsibilities, discontentments and problems. Sometimes better than the previous situation, sometimes worse.
Anyone have experience with this?
So all in all, who has not quite hit ‘rock bottom’ but still reached a point where they feel the endless discrepancies between who they are vs. who they want to be are hard to ignore, and made concrete efforts to change?
How did you determine what was important to change vs. what was not? How did you get to the core issues and not dance around with surface issues (ie if you feel insecurity but that insecurity is expressed via money or dating or appearance, address the insecurity instead of the surface issue)?