Apple Honors Steve Jobs: Dear God Why?

I doubt this is a dig at Jobs, but it might be a dig at the selection committee.

I’m going to go out on a limb here, and say that the selection committee was not composed of the best and brightest of Apple’s graphic designers. They’re too busy working on the next iWidget to waste time on picking out statues for the Apple campus. The committee was probably made up of HR people. And, (and this is just a guess) probably the HR people who didn’t have something more important to do. Note that the article says that the committee’s final selection is being sent to Cupertino “for approval.” So the art selection committee doesn’t actually have the authority to select any art.

I half suspect that what we’re looking at is the final result of an artist exasperated with dealing with a bunch of corporate idiots. The one and the zero, in particular, I suspect were placed there specifically in reference to the Greek tradition of putting genitalia on these sorts of statues, as described in Slithy Trove’s link. It looks like a pretty good case of getting something past the censors. I’m not sure what the Cyrillic lettering is meant to be, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re the Serbian equivalent of “FU.”

Looks like the perfect place to tie my horse when I visit Apple.

Forty-one posts, and I’m the first one who thought “coat rack”???

According to the link, “The interesting design was selected from more than 10,000 entries in an international art competition.”

If this is the one that was selected, I’d hate to see all the other entries.

No kidding. I use Apple products at work and at home and they’ve come a long way since the System 7, 8, and 9 days. But I have always been convinced that what success Apple has had was in spite of, not because of Jobs, and quite frankly I was embarrassed at the deification in the press by people who should know better. Especially in contrast to the attention paid to the passings of Dennis Ritchie and Jack Tramiel.

no, I actually thought that too.

I never wrote that the statue was ugly. Nor did I write that it was the most gorgeous thing on the goddamned planet.

Stop putting words in my mouth or my posts.:mad:

Yes, considering the eloquent RIP logo that a fan came up with. I bet I could randomly choose one of the other 10,000 entries without seeing it and get a better response.

My, my…having a bad day, are we?

Here’s what you DID say:

So perhaps the question could be revised to “What does this have to do with the subject of this thread?”

Come on, how bad could it bMERCIFUL MOTHER OF CHRIST

It not art. It just LOOKS like art.

I like it, but I like ugly art, brutal art in general.

“Interesting”. Heh. What an interesting word to use.

It’s a variation of the “Chinese Curse”: May you live with interesting art.

It’s like Jobs is a T-1000 trying to reassemble itself out of binary code.

I knew enough about Jack Tramiel to know that despite his flaws, he was an amazing man, prior to the Commodore 64 and later Atari. His home consumer hooked to the TV idea of computers was giant.

So, there are 9,999 other designs that somebody thought were worse than that?

Think Ugly.

Its shadow makes me giggle.

But wow, that thing is hideous.