Do you understand the irony of that comment? He was commenting on the fact that you were being dishonest about your true beliefs and hid them until very far into the conversation and all the while you were playing cutesy games with everyone. In case you forgot, here is what you originally said your beliefs were:
[QUOTE=kozmik]
am a conspiracy theorist. I believe the Roswell UFO incident. I believe that there was a conspiracy involving the events of September 11, 2001. I believe that there was a conspiracy involving the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I believe that there is an Illuminati that is behind the 192 heads of government, and, while I do not have proof for this belief, I further believe that the G-192 summit, if it were to occur, would be evidence of that belief.
[/QUOTE]
But 18 pages and 5 months into it we know your true belief is something like “I believe the world is controlled by shapeshifting Atlantean mutants who are in turn controlled by alien Lizardmen.” This thread would have gone much different if you had been honest with your beliefs from the beginning.
Again with your obsession with order. There must be order in the world. Everyone must have a place in the flow chart. There must be someone who is in charge and no one is on top. Except for the aliens. Remove all randomness, human nature, politics, economics and history. Reduce it down to a flow chart so life does not seem so random.
Even you Loach know the importance of chain of command in the military, in the United States. And in the United States that chain of command ends with the President of the United States.
But in this case there is no chain of command among world leaders. Or at least you haven’t demonstrated any, and until you present some (any!) evidence there’s no reason to assume one exists. You’re assuming there’s an end of a chain when you haven’t yet found a single link.
Fookin’ A, skippy! I despise false-flag operations. I have never hidden my belief that you were misguided about politics, economics and history. I have merely adjusted my beliefs in the face of the evidence you have provided and now conclude that you are also uneducable about these subjects.
Thank you that’s pretty much what I would have answered. Just because I have a boss and you have a boss does not mean it has to go all the way up to lizards.
So, if I grok you properly, you disagree with the idea that evil is an irreducible part of human nature and that human nature is the cause of evil. Further, you think that evil deeds, and good deeds, and everything else occur because of the Illuminati’s actions. Is this an accurate description of your beliefs in this regard?
When you say they are above considerations of good and evil, do you mean that they cannot differentiate between the two, owing to a moral perspective that is vastly different from that of humans, or do you mean that they understand our concepts of good and evil, but don’t give them any weight in decision making?
The movie John Carter of Mars was a commerical flop and recieved lukewarm reviews, at best. Its poor perfomance seems to have precluded any possibility of additional movies in the same series.
It featured a world-controlling conspiracy directed by shapeshifting, technologically advanced beings who directly and indirectly influence politically powerful people. Among other things, they incite wars and give orders to world leaders.
Did Edgar Rice Burroughs know about the Illuminati? If not, why is his story so similar to the details of the conspiracy? Did the Illuminati supress the movie because it was too close to reality? Why did the allow it to be made in the first place? Is it all part of some deeper game they are playing with the populace?
They can differentiate between the two and they do give them weight in decision making. It’s just that they are so powerful - so much in control - that they control all sides, the side of good, the side of evil, and otherwise, and they can control any outcome.
He may have known about the Illuminati. If he didn’t then may have came up with similar ideas due to the nature of his stories. The movie may have been supressed even though it was allowed to be made. It may be, as you speculate, all part of some deeper game they are playing with the populance. Notice that the Illuminati is being mentioned more and more in mainstream popular culture when before it was largely confined to the fringe or the obscure.
You forgot that Khrushchev, who succeeded Stalin, was removed from power in 1964. Do you believe that the conspirators could have done to Stalin what they did to Khrushchev?
Thank you for conceding that point. Just as the former Director General of MI5 made that argument, the former British Foreign Secretary made this argument:
Because there was no reason to trust the Taliban, and given the seriousness of the attack – which Al Qaida itself viewed as part of a war on the United States, a point you seem to ignore – there is absolutely zero reason for the United States to accept a compromise short of handing Bin Laden over to us.
There simply was no good reason why the United States, NATO, and the United Nations should settle for compromises offered by those who harbored Al Qaida after the horrific attacks on 9/11. I would say it would be unconscionable to do so.
