I said - less than 7%.
You have yet to prove to me that I shouldn’t feel uncomfortable letting those sick heterosexual men anywhere near my daughter.
Yeah, you heterosexuals really are obsessed with it.
Really? Then could you please explain the existence of sodomy laws to me, then?
Yes, I’m aware of all those “findings”. What you don’t know is that the APA caved into the liberal gay agenda on the re-definition. Psychologists can’t even suggest nowadays that Homosexuality can be treated, lest they be chastised. Even reparitive therapy, which the militant gay agenda won’t tolerate, is under attack.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, pretty strong accusations - not only are you claiming to be more knowledgable than the American Psychological Association and every other major mental health authority in the United States (let alone the rest of the world), but you’ve got some insider info on the subjugation of said organizations.
Tell me, do you hoarde guns in your basement?
Nothing, exept that any reputable psychologist will tell him he needs to work on self-acceptance rather than changing the very nature of his biology. That kind of help is good help.
But your defense of heterosexuality seems to rest entirely upon some biological sexual/procreational cornerstone - seems pretty clear-cut to me that that is all you’re concerned about (which also contradicts what you said earlier about not approving the flaunting of your heterosexual lifestyle). My, you’re just full of contradictions.
[ul][li]You seem to know an awful lot about homosexuals. Are you one yourself? Do you know any?[/li][li]I thought you were going to use this thread to defend your sexually-obsessed, morally-questionable heterosexual tendencies, not your homosexual ones?[/li][li]You have no authority to speak of the nature of homosexual relationships as you have never been in one (as far as we know). All of my relationships have been based on love, respect and friendship. Oh, and monogamy, too.[/li][li]You say commitment isn’t in our vocabulary - then why are we fighting so hard for domestic partnerships and same-sex marriages? Once again, you contradict yourself. Seriously, you should get that looked at.[/li][li]Last time I checked, I maintain the biology to have children - I could adopt, or artificially inseminate a woman, and that child would still be mine, biologically. And as far as I know, the government hasn’t yet gotten around to legislating procreation - I can do it any time I like, and raise that child any way I like. And, actually, this actually works alongside your argument for procreation among heterosexuals, so I guess we are just the same, aren’t we?[/ul][/li]
Wow, I’m learning so much about your mysteriously deviant lifestyle - it’s shocking, yet fascinating! It must be so hard to live your life this way - I hope someday you can change for the better.
Esprix
