Batman v Superman Seen it. Open spoilers

So I just came back. For context, I was not a fan of Man of Steel and I noted that while the critical reviews were almost uniformly bad, the “Average Jane or Joe” reviews seemed more positive so I had no idea what to think going in…and I liked it. A lot even, maybe?

I enjoyed that this movie tried to deal with the aspects of MoS that myself (and may others) didn’t like. This isn’t the Superman I would have made had I complete control but it is an improvement on the first movie. I liked Eisenburg’s Millennial Tech Billionaire take on Lex Luthor. It was interesting and different. He grated but it was obvious he was supposed to.

I enjoyed every aspect of the wider DC Universe (almost). Affleck makes for a great Bruce Wayne/Batman. I loved Alfred and having Alfred take the Lucius Fox role as his tech guy was inspired as there are so many characters to service already.

Wonder Woman was amazing and I liked her fist pump save the day moment. I am looking forward to her solo movie next year now.

The glimpses of Cyborg and Aquaman were neat (especially Cyborg). Flash, who shows up twice, once in what seems to kind of be a dream or a glimpse from the future and once on a video hasn’t quite sold me. He doesn’t look right but that is only after a minute of screen time so I will reserve Judgement.

I enjoyed the story and I liked Superman’s arc. I would have liked him to specifically say he felt bad about the events of the first movie but at least they seemed to some what understand the problem. I also would have liked more Superman Saves people moments. There were some but not enough.

I suspect I’ll be in the minority but I thought this was good and has me excited for future installments. What do you guys think?

Overall I liked it, but I was annoyed that I sat through the entire closing credits for there to be no stinger. :smack: Especially after the dirt started to fall up off Clark Kent’s coffin.

Wait, that was Flash who was in the dream thingy? I thought it was the Ghost of Robin (who I’m assuming is dead based off his Joker’d costume).

Saw it today as well and give it a solid B+.

Things I loved: Bruce Wayne’s motivation, Henry Cavill, Wonder freakin’ Woman, The great way they did Supes’s death, The slow-burn beginning, an older Batman and a younger Lex Luthor

Things I didn’t like: Seeing the Waynes killed AGAIN, Batman going from “I keel you!” to “Hey we’re ok now!” in a manner of two seconds, Super-armor Batman looked pretty dumb to me, Batman’s weird and stupid dreams.

Yeah there were some plot holes, and you can tell that the movie was supposed to be one thing, but they decided to throw in the rest of the JLA and had to move the movie accordingly…but oh well.

Side note: We saw Allegient the other day and, by god it was it an awful movie. Bats vs Supes is Oscar worthy in comparison to that

Good to hear from my POV. I was in ‘need to pee’ mode at the halfway point and decided to tough it out. Big mistake. When the first credit appeared I was out of there as fast as I could stagger without losing bladder control. :frowning:

Surely everyone has a glance at this before going to a movie nowadays?

The middle is an absolute trainwreck, but thankfully it rebounds and the ending (both the last fight and ending) are good.

  • Affleck is a good Bruce Wayne. But I thought he made a poor Batman. There’s at least 3-4 times during the movie where he has the “I’ve made a huge mistake” look on his face. I started not being able to take him seriously… though admittedly that may have just been the way he looked in the metal suit with half the face ripped off.

  • Wonder Woman was easily the best thing about the movie, all-around.

  • That said, I really didn’t like the scene where she looked at the email containing the info of each other super-powered individual. One or two quick scenes, a bit more mysterious, would’ve been a lot better. Instead every one gets quite a bit of screen time and basically completely introduces the character: HERE IS FLASH. HERE IS AQUAMAN. HERE IS CYBORG. The Flash scene was good, but the other two are pretty cheesy.

  • Really disappointed that the reason Batman and Superman fight is the old trope of “can’t be bothered to take five minutes to talk to each other.” Superman tries talking but Batman just immediately starts fighting him. After a couple more attempts at talking Superman just punches him and they go at it. SIGH. Morons. Especially Batman. The thing is, I think there’s a very good philosophical debate that can be made around Superman - is letting someone super-powerful do what he wants unopposed good for humanity? - and the movie gives some time to that but then obfuscates it with Lex and everything else.

  • The Batman/Superman fight is only resolved amicably because their mothers happen to share the same first name. What a silly thing for the fate of the world to turn on.

  • Eisenberg’s Lex Luthor didn’t do it for me. In every scene he was in I kept imagining Clancy Brown’s version instead and how the scene would be so much better.

  • On top of that, his motivations make no sense. He starts outdisliking Superman because he’s too powerful and an alien - okay, that’s standard Lex. Get Batman to kill him, okay. But after that his idea is to create a super-powerful uncontrollable creature to kill him? What was his plan to stop Doomsday after killing Superman? (He doesn’t have the kryptonite anymore, remember.)

  • What the fuck was up with that Inception-style dream-within-a-dream Batman had? Where he’s blasting away Superman-garbed soldiers left and right, then gets captured by Superman… then wakes up and dreams about some sort of weird time traveller (Flash?) talking about Lois or something. It made absolutely zero sense, completely took me out of the movie, and had nothing to do with the rest of the film. I guess it’s setting up something later (waaaaay later) but that scene definitely should’ve been left on the cutting room floor.

  • After the Batman/Superman fight, why does Batman go to rescue his mom? Why doesn’t Superman do it? (Aside from the fact the movie needs a reason to let Batman beat up on some human-level thugs and Superman gets to Doomsday).

  • Overall the movie took far too long to get going and into the good stuff. The first half of the movie needed a complete rewrite, not only because of weird scenes like the one above, but also to tighten it up. Do we need to have Lex frame Superman twice (first with the Africa attack, then with the Senate bombing), for example? Did we need to see Costner again? What’s the point of Lex’s scene with the Senator telling him she won’t approve importing the kryptonite (besides introducing that stupid painting)? Ugh.

Overall I’d rate it at around 4/10. There’s some decent bits there but a lot of stuff brings it down or doesn’t work.

Yeah those black soldiers with the red superman symbol on them were weird. Then there were those humanoid creatures with wings that were flying in and fighting or something.

I can’t help thinking how Batman v. Superman might have been decided very differently had Scalia lived or if Garland had been confirmed in a timely manner.

I liked it but it was a great example of the benefits of lowered expectations.
I went in entirely prepared for it to completely suck. I hated Man of Steel but I saw a cheap used copy recently and thought I’d rewatch it so it would be fresh in my mind when I watched the new movie- ugh, I could barely get through it. I remembered disliking it but it was worse than I remembered. So, there was really no way Batman v Superman could have disappointed me.

Affleck was great. There were things I didn’t like about this version of the character, but my objections all concerned how the character was scripted- none of which could be blamed on Affleck (in fact, his performance can be credited with elevating and smoothing out some of the problems with the scripting of the character).

I really liked an older experienced Bruce Wayne/Batman. Not just that he was older than other versions we’d seen but that, specifically, he was older than Clark Kent. Although a bit psychopathic in his vigilante life, he was presented as a mature responsible businessman, wise and dedicated to those who work for him.

They did a good job of showing that his dedication to good people is a flip side of his psychopathic drive to root out and punish criminals. Still, although a few lines of dialogue suggest that he’s been heading toward a breaking point in recent times, from dead Robin issues and the death and destruction of the battle of Metropolis, the bat-branding of criminals was way too beyond the line for me. Not to mention that he just kills too easily. Fans of the comics keep telling us over and over “Batman doesn’t kill!” but Keaton’s Batman killed nameless mooks without giving it a second thought, Bale’s Batman gave lipservice to not killing but he did so many things that showed such completely regard to human safety that realistically he’d have been leaving dead bystanders in his path, and now Affleck’s Batman who turns a few captured criminals into the cops but he kills as well- using guns, no less (although I honestly don’t remember if his killing of nameless mooks only happened in the dream sequences).

Also, Detective Batman, who’s brain is supposedly his most powerful weapon, doesn’t figure out that he’s being set up by Luthor. Lame.

Yeah, they’re really trying to take shortcuts to get to the kind of shared universe that Marvel earned by taking their time step by step. The quick introductions through Luthor’s files, really lazy.

Not just that he creates Doomsday with no planned kill switch, but that his entire motivation for killing off Superman is to remove Earth’s only defense against an alien threat that he knows is coming! This is anarchic Joker kind of motivation. Mysterious alien comes and takes over the world and destroys humanity, what’s in it for Luthor? Lex Luthor should be a villain who preserves and advances his own power as priority #1.

Way too many dream sequences with cheap fake-outs. One of my all-time pet peeves is when I character wakes from a dream but that waking from a dream is still part of the dream!!! It’s not clever, it’s lazy and it’s not how dreams work.

After so many dream sequences, I found myself unsure as the movie progressed as to whether I was watching a dream sequence or reality.

Gal Gadot was great and there was just the right amount of screen time for the character. I give major credit to Zack Snyder in that, in each of her earliest “Mysterious Woman” scenes I really did just see her as a “Mysterious Woman” character, waiting for her identity and motivation to be revealed later (I am not familiar enough with the actress to have known that it was her when she first showed up). I did figure her out before the actual reveal, but if I did not know going in that Wonder Woman was meant to be in this movie I probably would not have figured it out until the scripted reveal.

And, again, Affleck. I thought Affleck was great.
So, super low expectations + a few things done quite well = I came out of the theater having enjoyed the experience.

P.S. Did anyone else love the few lines of deliberately placed dialogue done with the purpose of excusing the rampant destruction this time around?

News Reporter when Lex has got lightning bouncing around the outside of Zod’s crash site: “Thankfully, it is late enough in the day that there are very few people here in the business district.”

First Presidential Advisor: “The first projectile has crashed down on whatever Island.”
Second Presidential Advisor: “No people live on the Island.”

After Batman has lead Doomsday from whatever Island to Gotham.
Superman: “Why did you bring him back to the city?”
Batman: “It’s the Harbor. No one is here after hours.”

Ummm, o.k. gotcha. Thanks screenwriters. No innocent civilians were placed in harm’s way during the destructive battle sequences. If only Man of Steel’s screenwriters cared as much about human life as the responsible Batman v. Superman screenwriters!

I went in with low expectations. Didn’t like Man of Steel, knew the reviews were bad.

But we decided it might make for a decent drive-in movie (we don’t go to good movies at the drive-in but try for a certain type of badness, for example, we’ve seen several of the Fast and Furious movies there).

It still failed to meet even those lowered expectations. Just awful from beginning to end. Wonder Woman was the best part but also completely out of the blue. Most of it I blame on Zack Snyder’s useless sense of visual style and apparent disinterest in narrative in service of it.

I’ve never read any of the comics, only consumed the various TV shows and movies over the years, have Metropolis and Gotham City always been across a harbor from each other, kind of like Tokyo and Yokohama?

I’m pretty sure that was The Flash in full costume traveling through time. I assume it will pay off in the Justice League movie.

And the flying animals in the other dream looked like Parademons (Darkseid’s Stormtroopers) which makes me wonder if all the dreams were maybe not dreams but something more.

Another thought: Zack Snyder doesn’t believe in post credit scenes but I think that scene of Wonder Woman going through the files would have made a perfect post credit tag.

I generally enjoyed the movie, but this part was so annoying pointless. Most of the dream sequences could and should have been cut. Totally useless.

If you want to intrusively set up the Justice League movie, have that dream as the after-credits teaser. Superman’s alive and gone bad if you don’t yada yada… stay tuned.

Good point; Lex Luther wouldn’t do something like that unless he had reason to believe he’d be able to collaborate with the mysterious alien (like in Superman II when Zod made him King of Australia).

You 're right. Also speaking of Wonder Woman, did anyone else notice Chris Pine was in the photo from 1918? Since he’s playing Steve Trevor does this mean the Wonder Woman movie will take place during WWI instead of WWII? :confused:

The movie is a 7.5 for me, but more than that, it was a huge disappointment because it could have been so much more. I read some reviews before I saw the movie, I knew about the low ratings that critics have been giving it, and I had low expectations. Afterwards, I read and saw a ton more reviews that helped me crystallize my feelings on this movie. A lot of my complaints are nitpicking, I get that, that’s why the doesn’t have a lower score. But because there is just so much nit that could be picked, I cannot ignore simply ignore them like some others have been, so this rant will be a bit long, sorry

The Good

Good action
Zack Snyder is known for being more flash than substance and the flash (not THE Flash) is on full display here. Just the look of the action, the bone-crunching sounds, the screen shaking with each hit, the back-and-forth action is worth the price of admission. The titular Batman v Superman fight didn’t disappoint and when they fought Doomsday, it was pretty much as brutal as you can imagine it. The rescue of Martha Kent was also a much better fight sequence than pretty much any of the Chris Nolan Batman movies. For those of you who played it, it felt a lot like the Arkham games

Wonder Woman
Wonder Woman, what little we saw of her, was mesmerizing. She was everything you expect Wonder Woman to be: elegant, mysterious, strong, commanding, smart, fearless, and beautiful. This movie got me more excited for the standalone WW movie more than any other property coming up in the DC cinematic universe. When she appeared to save Batman’s ass in the end, that was probably the best moment in the whole movie. I love that smirk she had when she got knocked back too. It was like “Oh, you think that hurt me? Guess again fucker!” Its how I imagine having angry sex with WW would be like

Overall conflict
I like the overall concept of why Batman fought Superman. Similar to Marvel’s Civil War coming up, this was ultimately about security vs. liberty. The Senate hearings felt like it could have come from the real world. We have this godlike superbeing that just trashed a whole city, killing thousands. Sure, it was in defense of the world, but its his people he was defending us from. Lots of people were affected and right or wrong, they won’t simply be placated with a “Its not my fault”. Batman is right to wonder about the danger of someone like that running around answering to no one. I think it grounds his motivations to something the audience can relate to

The Bad

Lex Luthor
I don’t like this Lex. As others have said, it looks like he’s trying to do Heath Ledger’s Joker mixed with Mark Zuckerberg. At no time did I get “evil genius supervillain” from him. It was more like “coked up trust fund fratboy”. The little tics and turns of phrases sound just so forced and artificial. The line “That’s a 3 syllable word for any idea too big for little minds poke” is destined to be remembered in the same way as “You know what happens when a toad gets hit by lightning?” and “I thought Christmas comes only once a year”. Where’s Ledger’s Joker seem to have an obsessive need to do his physical tics, Eisenberg’s Luthor seems like he wants to do them because he thinks that’s how evil people behave.

Sound
It was so. fucking. LOUD! While the main themes were decent, especially Wonder Woman’s theme, there were moments in the movie that you were distracted by the loud ass music. I can’t remember exactly when, but I think there was a moment with Lois, probably when she was looking over that bullet, where the music is just replete with drums getting louder and louder building to some kind of climax and then they immediately cut to the next scene. What could have, should have been a moment of mystery with her pondering over the object was turned into one where you expect an explosion or something big to happen any second now. More than once, the movie’s sound just get cranked up to 11 with little on screen to justify it

Too long and slow
When I first saw that this movie was going to be longer than any Marvel movie at 2h 31m, I thought that they were spending the time trying to cram every detail for future Justice League setups as possible. But instead, too much of it was spent with people slowly walking, people looking downcast and moody, and pointless shots that could have been streamlined. It reminds me of the first Hulk movie with Ang Lee where the director tried to turn what was supposed to be a fun comic book movie into some journey of self-discovery. Once scene in particular was near the beginning when Bruce Wayne is going to that party at Lex’s house. The scene starts with him in garage taking the tarp off of some expensive looking car. But for some reason the camera lingers on that scene and zooms into the front of the car to show us the logo. I mean, why the hell should we give a damn about that? What does tarp removing and the car logo have anything to do with anything? In another overly long sequence, Lois tosses the kryptonite spear into some water, then when Batman needs it, she inexplicably realizes that its the key to killing Doomsday and then goes back. Literally from her character’s point of view, she throws the spear away, runs outside, sees some fighting, and then runs back in. Also of course they have to put her in danger, she can’t simply be Lois Lane, tough female reporter doing something helpful, but she has to be Lois Lane: damsel in distress.

Lois Lane damsel in distress
Speaking of which, how many times was Lois in danger in this movie? There was the desert sequence, being tossed off a building by Lex, and trapped underwater. I mean, we get it, she’s Superman’s vulnerability, meant to humanize him and make him sympathetic. But did she really need to be in danger 3 times? Add to that, other than being the bait in the desert, she really didn’t do much did she? She spends her time either being in trouble, or trying to find info on that bullet which ultimately didn’t matter because Lex blew up the Capitol Building. And Batman was going back to retrieve the spear anyway, so if she hadn’t tossed it, they still would have gotten the spear

Dream sequences
Holy crap these were bad, even when I found out what they all were. Apparently Batman’s desert dream was of a totalitarian world ruled by Superman, but inter-spliced with a future ruled by Darkseid (see the Omega symbol in the desert and the flying Parademons). So, Batman is psychic now? What the fuck? He can dream of the future? If there was a clunkier way of foreshadowing, then I’m sure Zach Snyder is saving it for Justice League because those were stupid sequences meant to look and feel heavy but it just ended up wasting time. We didn’t need to see a world ruled by Superman, that doesn’t even make sense. Superman is a powerful being who accidentally causes damage and chaos, he’s never been someone who’s even shown that he wants to take over the government. And the warning about Darkseid just came out of nowhere. First, why combine it with a Super Totalitarian Government dream and why the fuck does Batman have that dream anyway?? As for the other sequence, apparently when Batman fell asleep decoding the stolen drive, he was visited by the Flash from the future who gave him some kind of warning. I could barely make out the dialogue, more sound issues again, and I really thought that was Robin instead. In fact, it would have made more sense if it was Robin because I thought it was a dream about when Robin died and Batman feeling guilt over it and that’s why he’s resorting to stealing from Lex and trying to kill Superman

Superman is boring
I’ve read enough review to see 2 schools of thought on this matter. First, Superman is inherently a boring character. He’s too powerful and the good old Truth, Justice, and the American Way from the 1930’s just won’t play well to modern audiences. Second is that he was boring in this movie. I’m in the latter camp. Henry Cavill barely got to do anything else in this movie other than punch and scowl. He goes through the whole movie smiling probably twice. He didn’t seem to learn anything from Man of Steel and other than dying, he really didn’t go through the type of change that Batman and Wonder Woman went through. Some of his characterization also didn’t make sense. Whereas his character was tormented by killing Zod in the last movie, here he runs a human through 4 walls and smirks about it. Instead of talking to Batman, even hanging back and letting him get bored with trying to kill him, he decides he can only tell Batman about his mom after a few punches

Pacing disjointed
This movie never feels like its going anywhere other than the next big set piece. It jumps quickly from one scene to another without giving much time for characters to reflect on what’s happened. Its too fast in some areas and too slow in others. They could have made the movie zippier by cutting out the dream sequences, shortening the parts about Lois pondering about the bullet, and that whole Senate hearings part with the wheelchair guy was just unnecessary

Missed potential
You might wonder what I mean about the Senate part being unnecessary. You might think that a huge part of the movie was about Lex trying to get the Kryptonite to the US and the whole bombing at the Capitol Building. But think back to the consequences of that. After the building was bombed, what resulted? Was there elevated terror levels in the US after that, follow up dialogue about how the president was freaking out and arming nukes, a plot about how the whole desert sequence thing was covered up by Superman by killing everyone? Hell, even by the end of the movie, did any characters mention that Superman was probably not responsible for the Capitol Building attack? None of that happened! They blew up the Capitol, Superman got out safe, and the rest of the characters simply talked about how they distrust Superman even more now. No consequences for his actions, no mobilization of the US army, no moving forward of any plot whatsoever. They could have included just one line during the Doomsday fight, before they nuked them, where the president could have said “Hey this is the guy who may have destroyed the Capitol, let’s nuke them both!”. But nothing like that happened, it was forgotten as soon as the scene was over! And the setup was stupid too. I think the news reported that the bomb was in the wheelchair, and that was being ridden by a guy who hated Superman. Why would people blame Superman for a bomb in a wheelchair used by a guy who hated him? It makes no sense at all

Superman’s Benghazi
Can anyone tell me what the point of that desert scene was at all? It was supposed to be a setup by Lex, his men were there using experimental weapons that don’t match anything else. All to get Lois in danger and get Superman to save her. Other people there were shot, and somehow, we’re supposed to believe, this will cause a domino effect of people not trusting Superman? First, why would Superman need to shoot anyone? Second, weren’t they terrorists? Lois’s first question was “Are you a terroris?” to that tribal warlord. Are we to believe that Lex believed the American people will give a damn about terrorist being shot by Superman half a world away? We don’t even care about that in the real world!

No deaths!
I think its funny how Warner Bros. must have totally overreacted to the complaints about Man of Steel’s Metropolis destroying rampage to the point where you are explicitly told “Hey, its after 6pm, there’s no people on the streets!” or “That island is deserted!” No, WB, we’re not mad because Superman caused destruction in Man of Steel, we’re mad because he acted like he didn’t want to kill anyone but killed a lot of people and made out with Lois Lane on their corpses as if he didn’t give a shit.

The Weird

Some of this stuff is nitpicky, but I’m not considering them to be that big of a deal mostly because you could imagine that there was an explanation, but either I missed it or the filmmakers didn’t really bother to explain it. They should have, sure, but given this movie’s long enough already, I can simply accept that it was a stylistic choice

Batman killing
I get that this is an older, more jaded Batman modeled after the Frank Miller series The Dark Knight Returns. Batman definitely kills, but rarely do you see it done on this scale. Even still, they should have at least made mention that after 20 years of being Batman, some of his old rules have gone out the window. He just doesn’t give a shit anymore. But that’s not how he came off as, he came off as just another costumed vigilante. I mean, why didn’t he just kill the sex trafficker in the beginning instead of brand him? Its inconsistent

Martha
I was originally going to list this in the Bad section, but I realized that even I never realized they have the same name. So I got fooled too. That’s why I’m not going to be too mad about it. However, it does seem silly that had her name been something else, Superman would have been dead and Doomsday would have run rampant over the world. And really, the scene came off as kind of silly. I know its supposed to be Batman finally seeing Superman’s humanity, but it doesn’t come off like that

Wayne Enterprises workers
Why did those people stay in the building until Bruce Wayne told them to evacuate? If he never tells them, they were just going to stay there and die? And if the kid’s mom was in the building, why was she out in the middle of the day alone in a downtown street?

Wonder Woman picture
I don’t believe some reviewer’s attempt at fanboy retconning that WW was simply bad with computers. She said Lex had a picture that she was trying to get back. Uh, first of all, taking Batman’s device isn’t going to do anything, he’s simply copying the info. Second, unless she was going to delete all instances of the picture from his entire digital cache, then simply getting a photo back, even if it was a physical photo, was going to do nothing. And third, if it was so important to get back, why did she give back Batman’s device? Now he knows her secret too

Lex’s Logos
So Lex Luthor apparently named and made logos of all the Justice League characters?

Lex’s stupid plan
So Lex had a pretty stupid plan with Doomsday. If Batman won, what was he going to do with Doomsday? He couldn’t control him, Doomsday was a second away from punching Lex into a pink mist before being saved. But more than that, the Kryptonian ship computer called the Doomsday’s condition a Kryptonia deformity? So in this movie, Doomsday is nothing more than a Kryptonian Elephant Man?

The party
Lastly, why was Bruce Wayne and Wonder Woman even at Lex’s party? It was a pretty conveniently overlooked plot. Why did Lex invite Bruce, what was the point? And why did he get so excited about introducing Bruce, a billionaire, to a common reporter? Did Lex already know Superman’s identity at that point? If so, how? And since the party seems to be invite only, why would he invite Wonder Woman? Just to get a closer look at her? If so, why would Wonder Woman accept that? I don’t know what secret identity Diana Prince has in the comics, so if I were her, I’d be very suspicious why I’m suddenly getting an invite to a party by a billionaire

Yes, it has been confirmed that Wonder Woman’s introduction to man’s world happens during WWI in the DC Cinematic Universe.

What’s funny is that I had zero desire to see this…but all the hullabaloo has given me more of a chance to see Affleck’s take…and i don’t really care about bastardizing Superman’s comic book persona cause all DC comics died to me when they rebooted the books the last time.

So…I kinda want to see this now.

Oh, and i had a thought…it would be funny if every dark, gritty superhero we’ve seen so far in this universe IS…the origins of the Earth-3 league. And we still haven’t seen the real Superman, WW and Batman.

We just saw it. I liked it…it wasn’t really bad. Definitely didn’t deserve a 35% on Rotten Tomatoes.

But it was about an hour too long. Way too many aimless, overly long scenes that should have been cut, scenes that should have been edited down, kind of shaky plot. And I felt like Snyder subcontracted the whole end sequence starting with the return from fade after the Doomsday battle to Peter Jackson. “Ah, this is the perfect piece of dialogue to end it on…oh, guess not. How about now? Huh. Nope. Now? Sorry.”

I haven’t been following the fan news about the DCCU, really, but is it confirmed that Darkseid is going to be the Big Bad for the Justice League movie? Because there are levels of Kirbyan kitsch involved in the whole New Gods/Apokolips thing that give me the shudders trying to figure out how they’re going to make it acceptable on film.

A great big thank you to all you bad movie lovers who paid to see this turkey and then came here to tell us how rotten it is. When I saw the RT rating I reluctantly crossed it off my list. But as an old time super hero lover, I still wondered. But not anymore. Life is too short for me to watch bad movies. But again, thanks to those of you who don’t feel that way.

I wasn’t expecting to watch it in the theaters, and not on opening weekend anyway, but I ended up seeing it. I don’t regret it.

It wasn’t terrible. I actually enjoyed it more than the Nolan Batman movies, each of which put me to sleep at some point.

Observations:

  1. The battle between Batman and Superman didn’t last as long as I had feared.

  2. I’ve been reading DC Comics for 40 years now. It never occurred to me before that Batman and Superman’s moms had the same name.

  3. I really, really liked the portrayal of Wonder Woman. I especially loved that she didn’t speak with an Anglo-American accent. Of course, that makes sense! She’s from another country! I just hope that the next movie doesn’t screw it up.

  4. At this point, Ben Affleck is probably my favorite Batman. Okay, Adam West had a quality that can never be beat … but non-campy-wise, I loved Affleck. He was believable as both Batman and Bruce Wayne and he wasn’t such a fucking downer with weird teeth like Christian Bale. George Clooney probably looked the part more than any of the others, but that movie was terrible.

  5. A lot of the men neglected to shave regularly, even if they were dressed in suits. I hope this is a harbinger of a trend that it is becoming socially acceptable for men to be scruffy even in professional situations.

  6. This movie was surprisingly religious. Besides all the explicit references to god and praying, the climactic battle ended with a freaking pietà!

  7. Doomsday looked kind of fakey. That was probably the worst effect.

  8. Some of the action scenes were hard to follow.

  9. I always like watching Jeremy Irons, but his portrayal of Alfred was way more on the “dad” side than the “servant” side.

  10. No Commissioner Gordon? I guess they couldn’t cram everything in.

  11. Eisenberg’s take on Lex Luthor seemed awfully Joker-y, but I bought it.

  12. I’m not sure I can get used to Batman outright killing people left and right.

  13. How many times do we have to see Batman’s origin story?

As it happens, it’s currently down in the 20s.