Which if you drink it in Great Neck is a total Jewy drink, but if you drink it in many parts of Suffolk County it’s a Wopy drink.
Believe me, when I drink it, it’s a faggy drink.
Can’t stand whiskey. Tastes like I’m drinking an oak tree.
A burned oak tree flavored with old brandy…
(but it has a high proof value, so thought I’d suggest it)
-XT
So does Bacardi 151.
Just sayin’.
I believe that was actually brazil84.
See . . . this is why I can’t hold grudges on the sdmb.
Unbridled ageism. you should be ashamed.
Which part was I wrong about? That neuroplasticity declines with age, or that you repeated the same thing over and over for weeks without any ability or desire to analyze what other people were saying and attempt to evaluate it?
I usually (try) and take things on a thread by thread basis. Sometimes I’ll agree with a poster in one thread and disagree with them in several others. Even someone like Der Trihs I agree with from time to time and will find something useful or interesting in what he says. There have been a couple posters (Redfury, Hentor) who I probably disagree with more often or have a ‘grudge’ against (though I DO sometimes find Red’s posts interesting and have actually learned a lot from him…Hentor not so much).
Gonzo though I’ve found to be pretty universally useless as a poster, without any shred of redemption in any of his posts. Even if on the rare occasions I agree with his stance on something I find his posts to be pretty much devoid of anything even remotely interesting…not even anything vaguely humorous, witty or even anything but mechanical.
-XT
I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that this was a Gonz type attempt at humor or a whoosh. I’m probably wrong of course, but that’s how I took it.
-XT
Wait a minute, you mean Brazilians aren’t Hispanic?
On the other hand, I immediately thought of a more striking example.
Brazil was colonized by Portugal, not Spain.
My apologies. That was a poor attempt at humor. Thank you though for the courteous response. 
Shit, you guys would be lost without Gonzo to beat up on, he makes you feel smart. You could ignore him, but you won’t, because you can handle him, you can sneer at him and get away with it. If three guys make roughly the same argument, you’ll pretend to only have read Gonzo’s, which you will rebut in the clumsy fashion of someone trying to type while simultaneously patting themselves on the back and giving each other high fives.
If you think his arguments are so unworthy of your attention, why lavish it upon him? Because you want to. Without him, you’d have to swim in the deep water with the big fish.
Don’t the bottom feeders also swim in the deep waters?
My, what big fins you have 'luci…
-XT
Remember that next time you think someone ELSES argument is stupid and are tempted to tell them so.
You got the shit kicked out of you in that thread too. We weren’t deliberately taking the easy pickings. Not that you’re much better - but who was in that thread making cogent arguments that weren’t effectively refuted?
Well, Gonzo does have one purpose. His arguments are usually blatantly non-sensical. Others on his side are often as well, but they hide it in fancy terms and flowery language. So, when you refute Gonzo, the absurdity of the argument is easier to see at least.