No way she’d talk about that, or she’d be implicating herself.
Nevrtheless, if law enforcement took it seriously, they’d find enough to charge him. Whether it would go to trial is another question.
No way she’d talk about that, or she’d be implicating herself.
Nevrtheless, if law enforcement took it seriously, they’d find enough to charge him. Whether it would go to trial is another question.
I have to wonder if a proper forensic examination of the documents wouldn’t reveal that they are copies, and that the “originals” that they were copied from had numbers pasted on them. Surely no human could align those numbers as perfectly as a computer printer would. There might be other clues, things like the kind of ink, etc.
Check out this page:
She wouldn’t have any choice. It’s known that her and Jimmy are sleeping together. The police will ask her about Jimmy’s movements on the night in question. She either tells the truth or she lies. Not long after that, she’ll be in court facing the same questions. She won’t lie in court so she can’t lie to the police.
So she tells them his movements and doesn’t say that she prompted them. It’s not like she hasn’t lied before, and this is about professional survival.
She will survive if she tells the truth. She hasn’t done anything wrong yet. Professional survival when you’re a lawyer means not committing perjury.
Accomplice to a felony is in itself a felony, even after the fact. Bye-bye license.
She’s not an accomplice. She just wondered aloud about how anyone going up against Chuck would need to dot their I’s and cross their t’s because he’s such a good lawyer. And then Jimmy got out of bed and left the house.
In Breaking Bad they say that Hector had a stroke in prison. So that’s how he ends up in the wheel chair.
Prequels have a shit load of spoilers.
Any good prosecutor could make the argument. Proving motive would be simplicity itself.
I think that there may be another thing that is also motivating him. Hector shot and killed an innocent person, a good Samaritan who stopped to help the driver that Mike had tied up. Mike no doubt feels guilty about this and perhaps feels that he needs to mete out justice on his own since he can’t report the murder to authorities.
Except the fakes no longer exist. Jimmy went back into Chucks house and put the original documents back in the file. (Presumably destroying the doctored fakes thereafter)
Isn’t that in itself damning? The ones with the bad address that everyone was looking at magically corrected themselves?
No they didn’t. It was implied through the flashbacks that he probably had ALS. Hank and Gomez mentioned something about a stroke, but they were just guessing.
Hector threatened Mike’s family—his granddaughter. Doesn’t seem the least bit forced, especially given Mike’s character and personal history.
Personally didn’t care for the ep. Primarily b/c I am starting to dislike Chuck so much, that I’m losing respect for Jimmy for not just leaving him on the floor of the copy shop. And if not that - once he survived, let him bake in his foil room. I don’t buy the whole “blood is thicker than water” schtick. By this time, Chuck has done enough crap to absolve Jimmy of any responsibility.
And I didn’t buy the Mike scene in the desert. Was just too cute for Nacho to stand in front of the guy, and for them to move in tandem.
My DVR missed most of the opening as well. Did the show start a couple minutes early or what?
And for folk who don’t care about BB, should we care who this Gus/Fring guy is? What other signs were there that someone has been following Mike?
Final thing - I don’t know if I’m being fair or not, but I felt that on several occasions I saw Odenkirk acting, rather than Jimmy. Subtle, and i think mainly in the hospital scenes. But there are times that he kinda sets his jaw or tilts his head that don’t really impress me as real.
Really stinks that the season is over. Will it be another year and a half before we get another dribble? :smack:
Those weren’t the copies that everyone looked at. Only Chuck looked at those when writing up the documents submitted to the court. Unless the doctored fakes leak out, there’s no evidence of it being anything but a transcription error introduced by Chuck.
Was it necessary to put a slash between his first and last names? lol
@ Pantastic:
As a writer myself, I’m becoming quite a fan of your writing. You’re talented!
Did anyone else notice that as Jimmy’s commercial finished, the commercial immediately following began with the word WEASEL displayed prominently? Garden Weasel or some such product I assumed; but I had a good laugh.
What fakes? Jimmy put the originals back.