Bizarro~!

Bizarro world, of course.

I got into this discussion the other day with a few of my “drink coffee, discuss inanity” buddies on campus the other day. None of us have READ the comics, so please forgive us if this is dealt with.

It came up when I casually mentioned that, in the Bizarro episode of Seinfeld, Kramer could also be considered the Bizarro Feldman. It then occurred to us, and by “us” I mean “the guy who argues with me all the time,” that Bizarroness may be innate, or it may be relative.

So, what’s your opinion? Is the theoretical quality of “Bizarro” innate or relative? If I came face to face with Bizarro Ace309, would he think I was Bizarro Ace309, or would he understand himself to have the quality of “Bizarro” as a simple, everyday fact?

Discuss. Solve. Buy many beers.

Erm.

Well, if the Bizarro World you’re talking about is, indeed, the one from the Superman comics, and the occasional 80’s SNL sketch, they all refer to themselves as Bizarro this and Bizarro that, so…

What am the answer, again?

[sub]What the hell was that bit about? All I can remember now is Joe Piscapo speaking bizarro, while they did bad camera effects…[/sub]

Cliffy–

In comics, Bizarro not know he Bizarro.

Hello.

On Bizarro SDMB, me read thread before posting.