Can psychosis be diagnosed from BB posts?

Phaedrus posted on 01-14-2000 at 04:04 AM

(bolding added)

Just so everyone doesn’t have to go through the whole thread.

So where’s my 10 Grand?


Livin’ on Tums, Vitamin E and Rogaine

KGB:

Bite my crank, you cum-burping gutter slut.

Well, that certainly was fun. I can’t remember the last time I had that much fun.


“It’s my considered opinion you’re all a bunch of sissies!”–Paul’s Grandfather

I haven’t checked this thread in a while. Now I look and all hell is breaking loose: obscenities, accusations, conspiracies, ultimatums, tirades. And somehow my good name is being tossed around amidst all this unpleasantness.

I don’t know what to say about such a shocking development except … COOL!

A relative piker like myself is being accused of skullduggery with the likes of Andros and Gaudere. That should help my rep considerably. Plus I noted in another thread that someone had suggested Phaedrus be banned partly for suggesting I have ahem an unusually intimate relationship with my mother. Once again, Phaedrus is bringing my obscure name to the fore.

Thanks, Phaedy!

Oh, by the way, you’re insane. Truly. I mean that. Go get help.


Up, up and away!

Some interesting stats:

Andros: Registered 09-08-1999.Looks like email address is his work account. Posts extensively in Pit, GD, GQ, and on rare occaisions in MPSIMS, on various topics.

Gaudere: Registered 07-28-1999. A different, but also work-related email address. Posts extensively throughout the board on various topics.

Clark K: Registered 09-03-1999. An AOL, and there for paid for, email address. Not exact proof, but supporting evidence that it’s too much work for them to be the same person. Never heard of him before; I don’t read everything and he has only a few posts.

Phaedrus: 9-25-1999. No available email. (Interesting, since you emailed others with obnoxious remarks. Turn about is fair play)Posts almost exclusively in GD, arguing the same points repeatedly. Often defends himself in the Pit.

KGB: 12-09-1999. An anonymous hotmail account. (Hotmail, of course, is notorious as the source of the multiple addies multitrolls require.) Posts only to defend Phaedrus; they never post in the same timeframe. (Phaedrus vanishes for a while & KGB bitches. Then Phaedrus returns and KGB is gone.)

So apparently your enemy registered Andros, Clark, and Gaudy ** before you came here.** Ye GODS, Phaedrus- Her psychic powers doth exceed thy own. Somehow she registered three names PRE-EMPTIVELY to plot against you.

Or you’re a sociopath.

Either of you demented sock puppets (by which I mean Phaedrus or KGB) are welcome to refute my fairly solid evidence that Andros, Gaudere, and Clark K are not the same person.

–John

PS, you owe Manny the money.

Phaedrus told me in another thread (I forget which one) that some of you regulars thought Phaedrus was ME. Please, in the name of all that is good, and holy… don’t tell me any of you thought this fruitloop was good ol’ ARG. And if ya did think he was me, please tell me why. I’m dying to know.

BTW, do I get to see any of those 10 G’s?

Adam

OKay, then Phraedus/KGB, I’ll turn this around: if you can show a simulpost between you two, before now, I’ll forgive you of my share of the $10,000 if Manny really decides to share it.

here’s a thought…i doubt that it would be possible, but wouldn’t it be neat if that the first three months of your membership would be like a trial membership? and if you posted anything considered ‘crap’ your trial name would be deleted?

i’ve noticed that most (not all, mind you) of the ‘questionable’ members are less than three months old…so maybe if the trial member’s names were in red or something, we could either believe it, if it seemed kosher, or take it worth a grain of salt if it were rambling, insulting, whatnot…

that way, any member’s name not in red could be considered a member in good standing and their opinion duly noted.

From Phaedrus’ email to Guadere:

You mean you made up quite a few friends.

Yeah, sweets. You’re about as sensitive as steel wool.

[quote]
People like us are touchy, no denying it.

[quote]

People like “us”?!? You are one presumptuous SOB. Gaudere’s way outta your league, pal.

Perhaps you should not post at all. In any state.

Then quit being an asshole.

Even if the people you have “contact” with vehemently despise you?

You do a really shitty job of displaying that.

Too bad your’s haven’t been.

Don’t be so sure.

Mmmmmmmmm-hmmm. :rolleyes:


“…being normal is not necessarily a virtue. It rather denotes a lack of courage.”

Hmmmm. The night has ended. Still no word from Phaedrus. All who are surprised, raise your hands.

ARG said:

I don’t recall anybody saying they thought you were he, but it might have happened when he first declared his opposition to evolution in the Flat Earth thread, before it became obvious that he was even more obtuse than you. :wink:

Considering his history in the “honesty” department, nobody will see any of that…

Phaedrus - the stuff you emailed to Gaudere is obsessive. (Not to mention your posts here and elsewhere on the SDMB.) For some reason, she’s assumed enormous importance to you, despite the fact that you’re not at all important to her.

Having been in some psychologically wierd places in my past, I can tell you from experience that that sort of distortion of reality means you need help. Please get it.

If you keep this up, I think we may need to ask one of our legal eagles what constitutes stalking online. Because you’re workin’ on it real hard.

It’s one thing to be unbalanced; it happens to most of us on occasion. But it’s another thing to act evilly. Even someone who’s unbalanced is capable of making moral choices, to act out of love or to act out of hate, anger, and malice. Let go of your anger, let go of your obsession. Get help, and find your way back to health.

Oh, I doubt that the $10,000 actually exists. I just want to say two things, even if I’m repeating someone else’s sentiments.

  1. Phaedrus/KGB…etc…is really mentally ill. In this case what you are all doing seems pretty obnoxious. It’s just taunting, eh? I understand he’s said hurtful things, but is it not better to leave him alone?

  2. Phaedrus is really sane, and taking you all on one big ride. If this is the case, and you have ample evidence…then torch him.


“Life is hard…but God is good”

I’m sorry all. I had just barely skimmed this thread, and had no idea that Phaedrus was stalking anyone. Well, then that does present a different problem altogether…

Adam

Jee-hoolie!

What is going on here? I ducked out of this thread after a half-dozen posts on the basis of its basic pointlessness.

I opened it up again when the post count shot out of sight. Wheeee-oooo!

Just one question: aside from all the cloak-and-dagger silliness, of just what terrible thing has Phaedrus accused Gaudere for which he thinks she should be banned? Having more than one Sig? (That’s a bannishable crime?) Disagreeing with him? (Are the rest of us on his list?)

I don’t get it.


Tom~

I think it’s just a knee-jerk reaction against a poster who has the skill and intelligence to take his posts apart, point by point.

Or maybe it’s something else that only makes sense to Phaedrus.

I simply don’t understand the man. Not his ideas, not his motives, not his personality.

He’s an enigma.
Others must think so, too. He’s certainly been given a great deal of attention.

I for one, have given up on the whole fiasco.

Think I’ll mosey over to MPSIMS.


A seminar on time travel will be held two weeks ago.

Way back on page 13 of the flat earth thread I presented this:

It is apparent now that I was in error and owe ARG220 an apology. I offer you my sincere apologies and I’m sorry, Adam. I hope you come back and read this.


Back to the shit at hand. Phaedrus, you fucking miserable whoreson, it appears you have no ‘evidence’ to post or it would be here by now. You have had more than a reasonable amount of time to produce it. If this were a court of law, and you claimed earlier you were an attorney, or some other such drivel, this case would be dismissed with prejudice.

But two other possibilities come to mind. The first, supposes your claim was just another lie in a very long string of them. The second, supposes you were a really shitty lawyer and are unaware of the rules of legal proceedings. How do you suppose the bar association would feel about that?

I guess the best we can hope for now is that you have just disappeared completely. I’m sure Manhattan will make an attempt to contact you concerning the money you owe him.
KGB:

Fine, great. I’ll repeat what others, and myself, have said, post the goddamned crap already. I earlier made an offer to let Phaedrus e-mail it to me and I extend that offer to you as well. Until you addlepated losers provide what you claim to have, you’re going to be excoriated. Isn’t that obvious?


What do I believe in? Not much that can’t be proven by logic and scientific experiment, and you better believe, I want to see the logic and laboratory equipment. --P.J. O’Rourke–

Potential claimants to the proceeds of my answer to Phaedrus’ challenge should feel free to join me in my newly born thread, Who Wants To Be A Phaedrusaire?


Livin’ on Tums, Vitamin E and Rogaine

Ohhhh. Unclebeer. Well, you obviously know that we are two very different people, and I gladly accept your apology. I’d use a smiley, but this is the Pit.

Adam

C & P’d from manhattan’s post at the top of this page:

I hope I’m wrong about this, but I think Phaedrus could get off on a technicality vis a vis this particular quote. He appears to be tendering an offer, but I don’t see where any acceptance of his offer has been communicated and acknowledged. That said, I am somewhat heartened by the fact that some of his subsequent posts can be read in such a way as to imply that he considers the offer as already binding upon himself. (after all, I do stand to come into enough change to throw a pretty decent kegger :))


Of course truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.
Mark Twain

Thanks, Adam. And I’d use a smiley but I don’t want Chief Scott jumping on my balls.

Well.

Well, well, well.

Well.

I feel even more startled then Clark and Tom. I was out of town for a whole weekend. And I see this abomination of a thread. As Clark said, COOL.

BEGIN OPERATION TROLLFEED (may ghod have mercy)

Here’s the latest, I guess, for those who might have missed it: www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000554.html

Phaedrus is now claiming that Li’l Ed asked him not to post his “evidence.” Nice bail, Shining One. Not.

As to the events of the last few days . . .

After I commented that his Amazing Psychic Predictions ™ about me were incorrect, he pointed out that I had indeed posted a count of the words he had posted in the “Earth is flat” thread.
Yes, Phaedrus. I actually spent a few minutes c&p’ing your posts into MSWord. And it counted the words for me. Obsessive? Maybe. Obsessed with counting things? Not hardly. (“One!! One trolling post!! Ah-hah-hah!!”)

Next,

It was a joke, pally. Read it in context.

While it’s not any of your business, I would like to point out that neither “Andros” nor “Mikey” are at all close in spelling or pronounciation to “Shannon.” FWIW, Andros is a very old family name. Mikey is a common diminutive for Michael (also a very common name).

Yes, perhaps because you only know newbie lusers who still think email is only for passing along “Top Ten” lists, ULs, chain letters and stupid virus hoaxes.
I have several email addys–two at work, two for my at-home business, one for spam (when I’m required to give my addy to a mailing list), and one for friends and family. I don’t always check them all every day just to please obsessives.

Unlike some people I could name, the SDMB is not my life. I do things, I have RL friends, I don’t spend my days in front of my computer at home desperately concocting alternate personae, a fictional personal history, and lame conspiracy theories (no offense, Krispy), while moaning about how awful life has treated me. Further, I don’t take this board seriously. I like being here, but it’s not my first electronic hangout, and it won’t be the last. Personal insults might get my dander up, but only because I allow them to. I certainly do not take this board into my real life.

I’d say that was a word to the wise, but instead I’ll keep in mind the Pounder line about pearls and swine.

Oh, John Corrado sed:

Actually, I was the one who started calling him “Bob,” after he told us his “real” name in the lamented “Earth is flat thread.” I couldn’t keep his pseudonyms straight then, and I’ve always like Bob. Has a nice ring. Sorry about the confusion.

And finally, this was on the 14th (Friday):

Sigh. If only.

-andros-