Casual Sex: Yea, or Nay?

Is casual sex, defined as sexual encounters between people not in a romantic relationship, acceptable in your opinion?

Do you think less of someone if you learn that they occasionally, or even frequently, hook up with people for sex only? This could be someone they meet at a bar, or just around town, find online, or even a more organized “fuck buddy” type of relationship.

Does the old stereotype of casually sexual people being “dirty” or “nasty” still get any play? Conversely, are people who dissaprove of casual sex automatically considered prudish by most?

Do you think casual sexual encounters are inherently worse than those between romantic partners?

If you believe casual sex to be wrong or immoral (not counting for religious reasons, that’s kind of a given) why?

I think it’s none of my damned business.

Well of course it’s not, that why it’s so interesting to talk about.

I have no problems with casual sex, or with people who have casual sex, but I do think of it as just something to tide me over until I’m in a relationship again. I think of casual sex as “less than” relationship sex because the emotional bond of a relationship adds so much to the sexual experience for me. Ugh, that’s an awful phrase, “sexual experience.” Sorry.

As for other people who disapprove of casual sex, I wouldn’t necessarily consider them prudish unless they insisted on trying to convince me to stop having casual sex.

Gotta echo the sentiment that it’s okay for a bit of fun and diversion. It might even be an opportunity to learn a thing or two for the ol’ “catalogue o’ trix” to mix things up.

But relationship sex rocks (with the right partner) while the casual sex just kind of keeps the wolves from the door.

Now, casual sex including the relationship partner - well that’s a zebra of a whole different set of stripes. :wink:

MMV

For the most part, no, I don’t agree with casual sex. Personally, I am just not wired for sex without love. Plus, there is the risk of diseases and unplanned pregnancies. I am not going to be hostile to people who choose to engage in such behaviors but I certainly would not encourage it or want to participate in it myself.

Wrong or immoral? No, I don’t see any reason to brand it as either of those. That makes no sense to me. Personally, however, I find it unrewarding. I’d rather go without than have sex without the intimacy. (And believe me, I know a thing or two about going without. Heh.)

YEA! Definitly YEA! I vote YEA! :stuck_out_tongue:

An emphatic yea.

Before I was married, I was all about casual sex. If I ever get divorced, I plan–quite hastily, too–to return to my roots. I can’t stand all the fuss and rules and burdens and crap of being in a relationship, but I really like sex. I love and am in love with my hubby, so neither one of us is going anywhere anytime soon. A gal can dream, though. A gal can dream.

No, not acceptable. Seems kinda cold to me.

Do you think less of someone if you learn that they occasionally, or even frequently, hook up with people for sex only? This could be someone they meet at a bar, or just around town, find online, or even a more organized “fuck buddy” type of relationship.

No, I wouldn’t think less of them as long as they weren’t in a committed relationship and thus cheating. I would definitely worry about their health.

As far as “acceptable” goes, I think I’d have more “respect” (if you could call it that) for a friend-with-benefits relationship than I would a go-out-and-screw-total-strangers-from-a-bar kind of gig. With the former, I think there’s a greater chance that both parties have given some thought to what they’re doing and have planned accordingly (STD testing, protection, what-are-we-gonna-do-if-there’s-a-pregnancy, etc.). Plus with that kind of relationship, both parties are physically safe. Going home with a stranger is really, really stupid. Once the door shuts, you are at their mercy.

**Do you think casual sexual encounters are inherently worse than those between romantic partners? **

Yeah.

If you believe casual sex to be wrong or immoral (not counting for religious reasons, that’s kind of a given) why?

Casual sex is a good way to spread STD’s. Those I know who were really into casual sex (as in picking up one or more people every weekend) almost never used protection, nor were they really into protecting others from whatever bug they might be/were carrying. They were in it solely for themselves, regardless of what damage might be done. You could very well end up with someone like that when you go out cruising for strangers, and even being the poster child for condoms may not be enough to protect you.

It’s also a good way to get/get someone pregnant, which creates an even more difficult situation.

Another way I saw casual sex backfire: one woman I knew, years ago, went nuts, left her husband and started hoing around with guys half her age, and quite openly at that. The whole county knew about it and her kids were humiliated (and this was without anyone teasing them about it, too). If you’re a parent and are going to have casual sex, I think you owe it to your kids to be as discreet as possible. What you do in the bedroom may be your business, but it affects others too. Expecting everyone in the world to just “get over it” isn’t practical – it’s not going to happen, and it’s unfair to drag your family into your drama.

Lastly, since this is IMHO, I think sex should be about more than just getting off, so I’m not wired for the casual thing.

I don’t believe in casual sex and wouldn’t want a relationship with someone who did. Not only the threat of STDs, but just the fact that they don’t equate love with sex would mean we probably wouldn’t be compatible.

StG

I have no problem with it. I mean, I wouldn’t sleep with someone I’d just met, but I don’t really have to be in a romantic relationship.

Please keep me posted on any further developments. :smiley:

For myself, a definite nay. I look at it the same way I look at playing with snakes or spending hours climbing a staircase to nowhere–I just don’t understand the appeal. For others, I don’t think it’s inherently wrong. I do think that exposing yourself to the risk of disease and pregnancy over something that’s meaningless isn’t exactly the smartest thing you could do, but as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult assuming those risks freely and willingly, I don’t see the harm in it.

Well all I can say is that I don’t feel sorry for the people that go on talk shows and test like 50 men and never find out who the dad is. If they have to test more than 3 or 4 guys then they don’t deserve to know who the Dad is. :wink:

I know you said not from a religous perspective but I was always taught that when you have sex with someone you share part of their spirit…spooky.

I harbor no down-the-nose-looking attitudes towards people male or female for engaging in casual sex, whether as an occasional thing or as a primary modality.

I’ve never been able to make it work for me, but if anything I’m envious rather than judgmental towards those who can.

I’ll say yeah, I’m all for it in theory but I do tend to be cautious. All too often in my experiences I’ve been with a woman and we clearly discussed: “This is just a friends with benifits thing right?” Then later on down the road these same women get all upset at me because I start seeing other women or I don’t call them enough.

In other words, what I’m trying too say is: The women I’ve been involved with can’t seem to help but get their emotions involved when they’re having sex with someone (me) for an extended amount of time. (Or even once or twice in some cases)

And in the end I wind up feeling like an A-hole for hurting these ladies even though I did nothing wrong.

If other people want to do it, cool, but for me, nah. I can get along just fine without sex with another person for awhile, and would rather wait till I’m in a relationship to do anything. Just personal preference. If it’s a monogamous “fuck buddy” relationship that’s a little different; I was still sleeping with my ex after our romance fizzled out but neither one of us was seeing anyone else and we were still living together so it’s not quite casual sex.

Casual sex would mean less for me, but I don’t think it inherently means less for everybody. Truth be told I wish I enjoyed the act of sex enough that I would be compelled to do it without the added romantic (or at least some kind of mental/emotional) connection.

You don’t enjoy sex?

I’m all for it. I’m in a similar “relationship” right now - the guy and I get together every few weeks for sex. We both understand that it’s 100% casual. We’ve discussed it before and made sure things were clear. Neither of us has feelings for the other. We are also friends outside of the bedroom. We share the same circle of friends and hang out quite often. Most of our friends know about what goes on between us and no one really cares. No one thinks less of him or I for it.

And also he’s the only guy I’m fooling around with so it’s not like I’m slutting it up all over town which is (IMHO) rather more wrong.

And I will agree that sex with romance/a relationship is FAR better. I’m just not in a place right now where I want to be in a relationship and until I am, this is fine for me.