Cisco has indicated a desire to pit me. However, he has requested that I start the thread for him.
So here’s the thread.
Over to you, Cisco 
-FrL-
:rolleyes: Idiot.
You call that a pitting? Pffft. C’mon, man, put some back into it!
He thinks he can bait me, put words in my mouth, make assumptions about my intent, call me names in another forum, AND I’m going to do all his work for him in his pit thread. He didn’t deserve any more of a response.
Link for the clueless?
Start here and scroll down to post #128 by PerditaX
Keep reading to the end of the next page if you’re interested.
Cisco’s sources won. nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah
Sweet Karana. Nerds that can’t even put on an entertaining internet fight? Giving the thread thus far a -3/10.
For 5$ bucks, I’ll write a scything rant for you 
As it stands now, this pitting is laaaaame.
Wow, I can’t believe I actually read all that. You really are an ass.
“Why the fuck do I have to configure NAT to get my PIX to work? Huh? Huh?”
That’s it? Come the fuck on. Lame argument by pissy internet nerds, lame pit thread.
Next time, let him/her start their own thread.
Notice the “him/her” you nitpicking bastards/bitches? Stop hijacking fucking threads for that bullshit.
what was it? Slide rules at pi paces?
What the hell ? No fuckwits ? for shame sir , for shame
I believe you mean “scathing,” unless your rant is going to go out and harvest wheat.
Nit-picking at no charge.
What kind of lawyer are you?
The good kind.
You are posting from beyond the grave?
You’re both asses.