Poe’s Law is in force. This is played so straight:
Cuckservative isn’t racist. It’s simply the correct observation that only White people can preserve traditional American values. The GOP can’t convert Mexicans and Guatemalans to free market capitalism because those people lack a cultural tradition of individuality or free markets. If conservatives want to preserve American values, they have to preserve a White America. Liberals implicitly realize this, which is why they push for third-world immigration - they correctly understand there’s no risk of these people being converted to tea partiers. But the GOP doesn’t get this and is unconcerned about the demographic decline of the only group that has ever supported American conservatism in large numbers.
I’d like to see that happen as much as the next guy, but I can recognize that it won’t. Leftist governments may be responsible for economic and social failure, but leftism is itself a consequence of cultural and environmental factors. And even though Zimbabwe probably should abandon Marxism, fly in Chicago school economists, and establish a government based on Lockean principles, they almost certainly won’t. It’s not impossible for non-White societies to create Western style governments, as Pinochet’s Chile and Singapore can attest, but it is very uncommon. And as such, if the US wants to maintain a traditional American government and way of life, we need to maintain traditional American people: Whites.
Um, dude, that’s textbook racism.
bobot
August 11, 2015, 12:16am
2
Can I get a list, please, of what American Values are? Because, goddammit, it sure seems to depend on who it is that’s talking about them.
I vote “not for real.”
I realize it comes across as terribly smug for liberals to claim that a conservative poster must be a troll. But honestly it would be more bias-confirming for me to think **Construct **was sincere. His posts are easily the most over-the-top of any poster here, save maybe one or two well-known cases.
He used the word intersectionality in a thread. The Venn Diagram of overt racists who know that word is pretty much just two separate circles.
He does seem to be good at matching whole rows of racism bingo in his posts.
His posts are generally memorable for their complete lack of substance in my opinion.
Richard_Parker:
I vote “not for real.”
I realize it comes across as terribly smug for liberals to claim that a conservative poster must be a troll. But honestly it would be more bias-confirming for me to think **Construct **was sincere. His posts are easily the most over-the-top of any poster here, save maybe one or two well-known cases.
He used the word intersectionality in a thread. The Venn Diagram of overt racists who know that word is pretty much just two separate circles.
He also used “beg the question” correctly. I was amazed.
But yeah. He’s either a troll, or David Dukes.
You’re incompetent and this is a bad pitting. I deserve better, so here are some of my more memorable posts (bolding added):
Theology doesn’t matter. The past doesn’t matter. What matters is reality, right now, and in the real world Islam is a dangerous and barbarous religion that has spent thousands of years trying desperately to subjugate every corner of the earth (thankfully, they were stopped by the low intelligence and incompetence of non-Jewish non-European peoples) . If you deny that the Islamic world is an incomparably worse place to live than the West, you’re just as close-minded and ignorant as any of the groups (creationists, GMO advocates, anti-vaccinaters) you consider yourself superior to.
Your transparently biased sources seem to be desperately trying to deny that cultural practices associated with Islam exist only in that culture.
In the end, though, it doesn’t matter: it is the things you value, like feminism, equality, LGBT rights, and sexual liberation, that will be the first to go.
The trouble is that you beg the question by defining any site that posts facts on Islam as anti-islamic, because Islam is the religion of a pedophile and false prophet. But see the BBC survey posted above indicating that 27% (>600,000) British Muslims sympathize with the Charlie Hebdo terrorists. That’s 600,000 perfect candidates for deportation.
…Agree completely. Marxists are an existential threat to our well being and way of life. Every single one of them should be lined up against the wall and shot, because that’s exactly what they’d do to us if they got into power. Might makes right, and we should crush our enemies before they do the same.
This is an anti-science viewpoint promoted by delusional ideologues who are not in correspondence with reality. It compares to climate change denial and creationism in its blind ignorance of evidence in favor of an unsubstantiated belief.
FACT : 1 in 4 British Muslims sympathize with the Charlie Hebdo terrorists.
FACT : 1 in 2 American Muslims want to be governed by Shariah law.
FACT : 4 in 5 Egyptian Muslims support the death penalty for leaving Islam.
FACT : 1 in 4 American Muslims believe it is legitimate to use violence against depictions of the prophet Muhammad .
FACT : 1 in 5 American Muslims believe that the use of violence is justified in order to enact Shariah law in this country.
They are your friends. Your coworkers. Your neighbors. And one in four would be perfectly happy stoning you to death for exercising your free speech rights. Islam is a cancer upon this Earth and an existential threat to the West. Thankfully, it will be bourgeois degenerates like yourself who are the first to go, giving all real Americans carte blanche to defend our culture and way of life.
God bless the USA.
You can pry my dozens of firearms and thousands of rounds of ammo from my cold, dead hands, except liberals are too cowardly and weak to do so. So keep whining and moping around on the internet, because you will never succeed.
Gun grabbers have lost legislatively, you’ve lost in the courts, you’ve lost in the court of public opinion, and you’ve obviously lost in any physical confrontation. Your efforts are absolutely futile, and you will never live in an America with fewer firearms than we have today. You have utterly failed at your objectives in every possible way.
Molon Labe.
Just to clarify: so you’re saying that **diversity is harmful, segregation is preferable, and homogenous ethnostates are the ideal polities?
I agree completely.**
If putting different ethnic groups in proximity caused the Middle East’s crisis, how is embedding extremely alien Middle Easterners in European society possible a good idea?
Get a haircut, wash your face more often (to get rid of acne), shave off your hobo beard, turn your baseball cap around, throw away your Magic the Gathering cards, and stop fetishizing degenerate American black youth culture. If you get a facial piercing, I hope you understand that you will not be able to find respectable employment.
So let’s see what happened here:
A criminal who was incapable of driving properly was duly pulled over by law enforcement. She immediately assumed a combative and uncooperative attitude towards the officer, refusing direct lawful orders and resisting arrest. In a testament to the professionalism and competence of American law enforcement, she was arrested without harm to herself or others.
Like many leftists, she suffered from mental illness. She consequently committed suicide in her cell, possibly correctly predicting that her death would continue the progressive narrative of a surge in law enforcement violence (when actual facts indicate that police brutality is at an all time low). The video of her cell, the autopsy report, and the scarcity of lynchings in the last five decades all support the obvious conclusion of suicide.
(this one got a mod note)
We’ve been compromising on our gun rights for centuries. Every time, we ‘split the difference’ and institute more gun control, and then progressives return a few years later to repeat the process. **No, you hoplophobic gun grabbing liberal, you cannot take any more of our rights.
The author of this article can enjoy getting forced by comrade Stalin into the gulags after he disarms the populace and some other lefty figures out that rent-seeking journalists at failed media publications like The Daily Beast are the real bourgeoisie.** I, like the rest of right-wing America, will continue to stockpile ammunition and firearms. Don’t like it? Molon Labe.
**I wouldn’t worry about that. Gay people already cost straight people about 100K (per gay person) in lifetime HIV costs. And thanks to Obamacare, those costs are born by the population at large—that is, straight people…
Sure it is. But the fight isn’t over. In fact, it’s hardly even begun.**
The problem is one of progressive’s own creation; bleeding heart liberals who are desperate to save criminal scum make mountains out of every molehill in the execution process. The reason the government can’t use the safe and effective drugs veterinarians use to put down animals is because public pressure campaigns instituted against manufacturers of those drugs (of course, by death penalty opponents) have prevented those drugs from being sold to governments that use the death penalty. This then forces the government to use marginally less effective drugs, and of course progressives are happy to complain about a problem that they themselves created.
The real issue is that the debate is on false pretenses. Criminals didn’t give their victims painless deaths, and so the state has no obligation to do so either. But the debate has been co-opted by one side who argue about whether the drugs are perfectly painless, when we really should be discussing whether murderers and traitors deserve comfortable deaths at all.
(this thread was even in GQ at the time)
Yeah, giving tens of millions of people whose only relation to Europe is a tiny toehold conquered via warfare and who aren’t part of the European cultural tradition free and permanent access to Europe is surely a good idea. Diversity is our strength and everyone knows the concepts that comprise the Western way of life, such as freedom of religion, non-violence and constitutional republics, are very important to Muslims.
The Muslims may have been stopped at the border of France and then at the gates of Vienna, by the grace of God, the third time will be charm. They have a force more powerful than any army – they have millions of leftists desperate to signal their support for ‘human rights’ and Islam on their side.
If you don’t agree that Europe needs some cultural enrichment from people who earn 10K/year and whose polity was in near-continuous decline for three centuries, you’re obviously Islamophobic and probably also racist.
/s
This is most of it, though there’s a couple less notable posts I left out.
Knowledge of Latin America is not his strong suit. Pinochet most certainly did not create a western-style government, he overthrow one, replacing it with a military dictatorship of extraordinary brutality. Then again, Construct appears to be confusing economic arrangements with political ones.
Of course, I don’t think Construct is for real so it doesn’t much matter.
ETA: I didn’t see Construct’s post above before posting mine. Case closed.
The Pit that Pits itself … well done Construct
Not just anybody doubles down like that. I’m impressed, albeit appalled.
What the hell is wrong with this board’s moderators? Why isn’t he banned? God this board is only good for lulz now.
He seems like your bog standard white nationalist, nothing unusual. They don’t tend to be particularly liberal, though I’ve seen a few.
wonky
August 11, 2015, 2:25am
14
Dammit, this is what I get for being so amused by hi post. Everyone wants to take away my fun.
[Cousin Vinny]
You were serious about that?
[/Cousin Vinny]
j666
August 11, 2015, 3:21am
16
I’m thinking, “no”.
Where’s the line between trolling and reductio ad absurbum?
Well, his username is “Construct”. I’m guessing he’s a caprophobic bridge-dweller, who’s in it for the evulz. Thus, not worth engaging.
Leaper
August 11, 2015, 4:08am
18
Poe’s Law. It’s not like this board hasn’t seen a lot of others with similar opinions.
Though this thread might provide some more discussion fodder for them…
(I’m not sure if the sequel belongs here, or in the IMHO thread. I’ve posted it to both.)
… Zimbabwe probably should abandon Marxism, fly in Chicago school economists, and establish a government based on Lockean principles, they almost certainly won’t. It’s not impossible for non-White societies to create Western style governments, as Pinochet’s Chile and Singapore can attest, but it is very uncommon. And as such, if the US wants to maintain a traditional American government and way of life, we need to maintain traditional American people: Whites.
How about blacks, whose ancestors have been in U.S.A. longer than Irish, Italian immigrants, etc.? Or 2nd-generation immigrants from Asian and Hispanic cultures? Or 1st-generation immigrants for that matter who become U.S. citizens? Are they incapable of voting intelligently, or do you just not like how they vote?
Emiliana:
Knowledge of Latin America is not his strong suit. Pinochet most certainly did not create a western-style government, he overthrow one, replacing it with a military dictatorship of extraordinary brutality. Then again, Construct appears to be confusing economic arrangements with political ones.
Of course, I don’t think Construct is for real so it doesn’t much matter.
Yes. But Pinochet is a go-to paradigm for Hyperlibertarians to point to as a real-world paradigm. Other examples proposed include (1) U.S.A. before FedRes, SEC, EPA, SocSec etc., i.e. 1920’s-era America; (2) Somalia(!), (3) medieval Ireland(!!).
(Nevermind whether the troll would present as HyperLib if probed. This post isn’t about him.)
IOW, who else they got? The opportunities for new economo-political systems arose at the Soviet Fall, but Russia finished with a thugocracy. The Adventure in Iraq was undertaken by many as a demonstration by the NeoRepublicans – they would nurture a prosperous and vibrant new democracy , (which would then gratefully return much of its oil revenue to its liberators). With the Adventure failing, the Hyperlibs are stuck with … with what? Pinochet’s Chile is the best to be conjured up!?! Appropriate since the Hyperlibs are about nothing if it isn’t Property Rights, and such rights do dictate armed forces adequate to protect property owners .
(In fairness to HyperLibs: Although GWB hired young Republicans to administer Iraq who were demented enough to fall for the italicized clause, most toilet-trained Libs are smart enough to reject the whole Adventure against Gog and Magog in Iraq.)
