Somedays it doesn’t pay to leave your house.
You never know when a crazed 250 lb nekked woman will stomp the crap out of your car hood and windshield.
this link is NSFW: http://sfist.com/2012/02/24/large_naked_woman_stomps_on_car_in.php
That link needs a NSFW tag on it.
the boards wonderful edit time out makes that impossible.
They had her face blurred and I thought her tits were too. I wasn’t looking that close. Its a SF news article and should be censored.
This one is safe. All nicely digitized over the woman.
sigh I feel for this guy. Just *once *I’d like for a naked chick to stomp on my windshield who *isn’t *mentally unhinged.
The extent of the windshield smashing is pretty shocking. That guy in the car must have bailed out of the car pretty quick. She came close to getting her foot through it.
It’s probably a good thing that someone got a picture of it. I wouldn’t like to explain that to my insurance company.
Okay, it’s funny, but I feel sorry for that poor lady. She is obviously not well.
She wasn’t completely naked. She had on sneakers.
Might have been naked Bowling, They make you wear those shoes.
See what happens when you try to sneak out in the morning without waking her up
NSFW warning: Gawker’s user comments are full of win on this one.
On the plus side, she was naked, so at least the diver got something out of it
I call BS on the photo. I suspect it’s a “recreation” of the events. The woman in the photo appears to weigh less than 250 lbs. There are other things that don’t add up, but I’m too lazy to list them.
Plus-sized.
Words I live by, though I would say **most **days.
Folks, we’re calling the picture, staged or not, NSFW, so please use the two click rule for links that feature it.
Thanks,
twickster, MPSIMS mod
A trauma?
The bends?
[Bolding is mine.]
While I agree that there’s no way that the woman in the picture weighs 250lbs, do you really think that some other woman would agree to get undressed and have her picture taken to recreate the event?
And it’s nice they could find a car that was the same color, too…
If the photo is a recreation, it’s a really shitty one: it’s a cameraphone picture taken through a window, and you can see the reflection of the photographer. I am surprised they couldn’t edit that out whether it is real or fake. Does the Daily Mail make up stuff like this?