:rolleyes:
Hey, I told him I’d see him in the ring!
[…shuffling feet… …throwing air punches… …showing gold tooth for camera…]
And that somehow makes the organization official…um, how? Dude, you need to sit down and think a tad.
Cripes, I called him a “decrepit old fart.”
Some fuckin’ demanding Pit denizens you all are.
.
And here we have a perfect example of what I wrote about in my first reply to Lib: thick as a brick and obviously proud of it too.
Sorry, I don’t do crayons, Monty. You’ll just have to wait for one of those “more patient” people I wrote about to draw you a clearer picture. Or you could watch the documentary. It’s not rocket science although it obviously appears that way to you.
Really.
Dude, you questioning Monty’s intellect is about like Lord Littlebrook (billed as 4’4", 110 pounds) kicking Andre the Giant (billed as 7’4", 500 pounds) in the shins. But not as funny.
Really.
What does an organization need for you to think it’s “official”?
“The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a US political neo-conservative think tank, based in Washington, DC co-founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The group was established in early 1997 as a non-profit organization. The chairman is William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and a regular guest on the Fox News Channel. The group is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project, a 501(c)(3) organization that has been funded by the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation and the Bradley Foundation.[1]”
And, yet, it’s still not an organ of the US government. Go figure.
Thanks, Oakminster.
Yes, very honorable to threaten to beat someone up in circumstances where you know he is no position to accept your challenge.
While RedFury gets help with his drinking problem (if he has one), perhaps you and your mate Oakminster can get some anger management counselling. You need it.
What makes it ‘official’ as so many of the sigs went into the heart of the Bush regime and put there principles into operation with bloody consequences. That is pretty obvious.
Unless of course there are two Dick Cheney’s, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Zalmay Khalilzad, I. Lewis Libby and on the letter to Clinton calling for the overthrow of Saddam by all means including military, John Bolton.
Either you knew this and are being disengenuous or you are too uninformed to comment on the subject.
Your point being?
BTW ever heard of the “Republican Party”?
Hell, I will throw my balls in the flames too.
What do you think you are achieving with your hysterics?
Are you composing a list of people who will be the first against the wall?
Fucking idiot.
People like you make me fucking sick.
You apparently have no respect for the laws and values your military is supposed to uphold.
Amen.
Wow, you are not only a fucking bully, but you are also a flaming hypocrite douchebag.
Go fuck yourself with a chainsaw.
Apparently, I was right in my spot diagnoses, tagos. You really are insane.
And what you need is a few lessons in reading comprehension. Please show where I threatened to beat someone up. Here is what I wrote—which you quoted:
The entire post is a commentary on how PinkFury handled his problem with Oakminster. You’ll be able to determine that for yourself after those reading comprehension lessons.
Look dude, if you want to continue proving that you are stupid please continue. But you’re just embarrassing yourself now and I’m beginning to wonder if you really do have some sort of learning impairment.
Excellent. Headway. Now we have three whacky self -professed military haters. So, Der Shit is not the lone exception as has been cliamed on these boards more then once. Anyone else want to step up and at least get credit for being honest, as they have? Anyone?
**Der Trihs
MrDibble
Scoundrel Swanswater
Scoundrel**, thanks for the info about me making you sick. I hope to return the favor and pass some good news on to you someday. And you may want to reread the thread. If you do, this time around you might notice that I’ve argued that the likes of you three should be allowed to speak your mind. I think two other posters had, in fact, commented on that.
But thanks again. The day starts off on a positive note.
Just because their ideas may have eventually been adopted does not make them an official arm of the government, or even of the Republican party. And you might want to think about why you put the “official” in quotes. Makes it rather oxymoronic and undermines the very point you are trying to make.
That is just childish hair splitting and you either know that, in which case you should not be using such a school boy debating tactic, or you need to wise up.
The reality of the situation is that an organisation has both set the US foreign policy for this decade and then provided the self-same people the the Executive to implement it. And they have tried to implement it with dreadful results.
To carp on about the precise dictionary definition of official as if this is some ‘neener, neener’ playground game instead of a discussion about something of deadly and long lasting impact on the domestic and world scene is petty, an insult to the intelligence of a whelk and a slap in the collective face of everyone these people have gotten killed or maimed.
The PNAC took over US Foreign policy and their ideas and their people remain in control and remain trying to sell us imaginary victory in Iraq and foist a new war on us in Iran.
Can’t you see just how pathetic it is for people like you and Monty to carp about the narrow meaning of a term in this ‘gotcha’ way as if it is in any sense clever or relevant compared to the actual continuing problem?
Somehow I think you’re both so poisoned and blinded by partisanship, so steeped in denial, and so pickled by fear and blind hatred that you can’t. It’s kind of sad really.
Yeah, we are allowed to speak our mind so you can make your little pathetic list of military haters. :rolleyes:
And for your information : I don’t hate the military, I just think the Iraqi people have the right to take up arms against an illegal occupying force.