I thought this thread would be helpful.
I could use a bunch of dead squirrels myself.
My reason is to practice new taxidermy techniques. It’s very hard to be a taxidermist when you live in Boston.
Please, somebody has to do better than what we have here because he’s not the only one who desperately needs more dead animals.
** Carnivorousplant **-
Can you really hook people up with some nice dead rats?
Preferably lab rats that are less likely to be diseased like city rats.
Only those that post on the board. 
Nadia did take one out, but she tends to mangle them a bit.
Sprinkle some pepper on the above vehicles and they will stop. The felines, not the vehicles. Of course the vehicles will stop when you stomp on the brakes, unless…but I digress.
Brunswick stew is your idea of a prank? You have heard of toilet paper, right?
And, to highjack a moment, why isn’t squirrel available in the supermarket? They breed quickly, cost little to feed, and are supposed to be delicious. I’ve seen everything from rabbit to quail to ostrich to buffalo, but never squirrel.
Fine…
The 20 gauge and 8 shot would be near imperceptible but…
In the interest of science and morbid curiousity…
Hav-a-hart live trap and rat poison…
Hey they really are just tree rats.
Are you in a suburb or downtown? Suburb would make this easy. Downtown might require a trip to the suburbs.
Does this mean there is a market for dead squirrels on e-bay??
Live trap and peanut butter.
Find someone that lives near a park that has squirrels. I’ll bet they hate the little buggers.
You can drown them while they are in the trap.
It is getting near trapping time. Go to the country after season opens and ask about. Someone out there knows a trapper.
Opal and Peta, my post was not at all intended to disparage your beliefs, just as a comment on what I saw as inappropriate wording. While we certainly don’t agree on the matter of animal rights, I respect your position and sensibilities.
On the other hand, I get annoyed at the use of anthropomorphizing as an argumentative tactic, as it depends on having accepted the premise that animals are in some way equivalent to humans. Therefore, I see such arguments as appealing primarily to people who support your cause already, and thus they hit my ears as merely propaganda. I think both the cause of animal rights and the spirit of rational debate on the matter are better served by avoiding this line of reasoning.
Oh, the definitions Peta mentions were in neither of my dictionaries.