Dirty Sexy Money 10/17 Spoilers

Cafe Society
1

In th earlier thread on the show, I said:

Looks like I nailed that one. Tish is going to Reveal All.

So which one will it be? Or more than one?

Or is it a double bluff, in which the envelope says that none are (or that it’s inconclusive or full of blank paper) and Tripp’s just trying to trap her into an admission?

I’m also finding it weird that Jeremy and Juliet are actually less irritating than their older siblings. Which I guess means that they’re Dutch’s kids. Unless one twin is and one twin isn’t. What a twist that would be.

2

If it’s anyone, it’s the priest. Of the kids, the only ones who’ve had any serious interaction with the New Family Lawyer are the tranny lover, the drunk chick and the priest. The tranny lover is already embedded in the “I love a tranny” storyline and ABC isn’t going to have an incest storyline any time soon. Thus, it’s Father. If it’s anyone.

3

Yeah, my money is on the priest too.

When he was talking about how he never really fit in, it seemed a bit like foreshadowing to me.

4

I’m seriously loving the drunken sister. “You can really be a bitch.” “I know, it’s a real problem!” Hee.

5

Do I have to appear in panties every single episode? Damn. This means I can’t eat for the entire year!

6

I think it might be a bluff. Did anyone else think it was strange that Tish’s OB/GYN apparently has DNA samples of all her children?? :dubious:

7

The priest is too obvious. But I’m loving the character “In this house, we pay the rent with honesty. Don’t make me raise the rent.” and his very interesting take on the David & Goliath story.

8

I was finally able to watch this episode last night. I enjoy this show more than almost anything on TV.

I guess I don’t see how Tish would even know which kids are Tripp’s.