I was hoping it was leporiphobia. Fear of bunnies. What else is coming in March besides the Easter Bunny?
Mooch’s prediction concerning March would only make sense if there were a significant primary challenge to Trump. Super Tuesday in 2020 is March 3. Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia will all hold their presidential primaries on that date.
But that is unlikely to happen. I am not sure that Trump’s vaunted base is big enough to win him a second term, but it is damned sure big enough to win Republican primaries.
(April 12th, 2020).
See, I’ll let you in on a little secret, okay?
Just because the big day may or may not be in April, the Easter Bunny gets started early.
He is creeping around, doing his thing.
The “need for chaos” drives thump supporters.
My bold.
This is a really long article, which I have not done justice to with my edits.
It supports what we’ve said all along: there is no strategy behind the president’s so-called “policies.” “Drain the swamp” in essence means “bring down the whole shootin’ match!” (excuse the expression). It’s the message of destruction that appeals to his base, not the promise that he is going to make life good for them. So when he doesn’t deliver on The Good Life, that’s okay, as long as the libruls are in tears at the end of it. He says he’s never heard of a Category 5 storm?? HE IS a Category 5 storm. Destruction for all in his path as he blows back to where he came from, untouched and unchanged.
*Michael Bang Peterson-- is that the BEST researcher’s name you’ve ever heard? He should just start writing it *“Michael ! Peterson.” *
**“a low evidential basis” :rolleyes: That’s Scholar Talk for LIES.
Mooch is a dick but maybe he’s on to something. It is possible that the recession arrives in late 2019 or early 2020. Farmers and factory workers might be sick of taking a bullet for the madman’s stupidity. Polls may show Biden on his way to a landslide. With that in his face, Donald may prefer resignation to a humiliating defeat. He may come up with butt spurs that prevent him from sitting in the Oval Office or say he needs to devote full time to supervising Tiffany’s diet. We can always hope.
What is the technical term for someone who has a fear of people who have a fear of bunnies? They scare me, and I want to stay away from them! 
Oh, and no, I don’t think he will. 
I will say, the signs of his growing decline can be seen in this comparison between 2015 and 2019 Dotard:
:eek: WHOA!! That is scary. The difference in his delivery, tone, and just ease in talking is shocking.
By picking Hillary Clinton, the Democrats (National Committee or primary voters - you decide) chose one of only two people who could possibly lose to Trump. If Biden gets the nomination then you’ll see who the second is.
You mean the guy who is polling better than any other Democrat?
No, there’s at least two others - Warren and Sanders.
Which is exactly what the Kremlin and the GOP wants us to believe.
We now know why Clinton lost and those mistakes wont and cant be repeated.
Many people are now aware of kremlin dis-information and Fake news, and Facebook, etc have been taking steps to stop it also.
Also, there wont be any Comey Memo for Biden.
I love how you wave away the top three candidates. :rolleyes:
Oh and of course Beto and Booker and Pete and Julian and Ryan and Bullock can’t win either. And there’s no way Obama is gonna beat war hero John McCain.
Bottom line: no one’s electable until they are. Often, there’s just an unpredictable something on the campaign trail that puts someone over the top, regardless of what the “common sense” or their resume says.
I don’t think most of these current candidates are unelectable against Trump*, and I say this as someone who, up until about a month ago, was convinced only a moderate white male who would appeal to blue collar white males and their families in the Industrial Midwest could win. Now I’m open to almost anything. I think almost any one of these candidates has potential to win, as long as they don’t ignore the people Hillary ignored in 2016 (blue collar white males and their families in the Industrial Midwest).
*Except Marianne Williamson. She’s a joke candidate. Andrew Yang’s not much better.
I would imagine most of those can. They don’t have the decades of baggage that the others have and, related to that, aren’t far too old for the job.
Since Kennedy, all Democratic Presidents (except Johnson, who wasn’t elected for his first term) were relatively young, charismatic and from outside the party machine - or at least appeared that way. With the arguable exception of Carter in 1980, that can’t be said of any Democratic losers. There’s a pattern here.
Random internet person says certain candidates can’t win! Film at 11!
That was a constructive comment. Care to say what I’ve missed in the pattern I’ve seen over the past several decades?
But you see, in order not to get Swiftboated- baggage is necessary.
But please keep this up, you are making trump very happy indeed.
Not in the least. It was purely 100% negative.
How about who you support and why?